Moore v. State
| Decision Date | 24 February 1988 |
| Citation | 311 Md. 719,537 A.2d 273 |
| Parties | Moore (Mitchell Mickey) v. State NO. 536 SEPT. TERM 1987 |
| Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Reported below: 73 Md.App. 36, 533 A.2d 1.
Denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
9 cases
-
Solomon v. State
... ... State, 49 Md.App. 605, 434 A.2d 1030 (1981); Epps v. State, 52 Md.App. 308, 450 A.2d 913 (1982); Samuels v. State, 54 Md.App. 486, 459 A.2d 213 (1983); Sye v. State, 55 Md.App. 356, 468 A.2d 641 [646 A.2d 1067] (1983); McKinney v. State, 82 Md.App. 111, 570 A.2d 360 (1990); Moore v. State, 84 Md.App. 165, 578 A.2d 304 (1990); Cook v. State, 84 Md.App. 122, 578 A.2d 283 (1990), cert. denied, 321 Md. 502, 583 A.2d 276 (1991); Marks v. State, 84 Md.App. 269, 578 A.2d 828 (1990); Manuel v. State, 85 Md.App. 1, 581 A.2d 1287 (1990); cert. denied, 322 Md. 131, 586 A.2d 13 ... ...
-
Cousar v. State
...State ], 282 Md. [468,] at 474, 386 A.2d [757,] at 761 [ (1987) ]; Moore v. State, 73 Md.App. 36, 44, 533 A.2d 1, 5 (1987), cert. denied, 311 Md. 719, 537 A.2d 273 (1988). If one or more of the exceptions applies, the next step is to decide whether the accused's involvement in the other cri......
-
Snyder v. State
... ... Any probative value evidence of failure to inquire has is slight compared to the substantial danger that it will result in unfair prejudice. See Bedford v. State, supra, 317 Md. 659, 566 A.2d 111 ... See also 10 Moore's Federal Practice § 403.02[3] (2d ed.1979) (pointing out, "[i]f the relevance of the proffered evidence is suspect or slight but would be prejudicial then any justification of its admission is slight or non-existent") ... We concluded, in Bedford, that ambiguous and ... ...
-
State v. Faulkner
... ... That is a legal determination and does not involve any exercise of discretion. See Cross, 282 Md. at 474, 386 A.2d at 761; Moore v. State, 73 Md.App. 36, 44, 533 A.2d 1, 5 (1987), cert. denied, 311 Md. 719, 537 A.2d 273 (1988) ... If one or more of the exceptions applies, the next step is to decide whether the accused's involvement in the other crimes is established by clear and convincing evidence ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results