Moore v. United States

Decision Date31 March 1908
Docket Number1,765.
Citation159 F. 701
PartiesMOORE ex ux. v. UNITED STATES et al.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Rehearing Denied April 29, 1908.

Charles P. Cocke, for appellants.

Rufus E. Foster, U.S. Atty., for appellees.

Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The case does not show, except by ex parte affidavit of Mrs. Moore attached to the petition for habeas corpus, that Auburn Moore was a minor when he enlisted in the United States military service, or that his enlistment was without the consent of his parents. The case was submitted in the lower court on the return of the military commandant, as follows:

'That the said Auburn Moore was duly enlisted as a soldier in the service of the United States at Columbus, Ohio, on February 6, 1907, for a term of three years. That the said Auburn Moore deserted said service at Ft. William Henry Harrison, Mont., on December 19, 1907, and remained absent in desertion until he surrendered himself at Jackson Barracks, New Orleans, La., January 3, 1908, and was thereupon committed to the custody of the respondent as the commanding officer of the post of Jackson Barracks. That the said Auburn Moore has been placed in confinement charged with said offense, and formal charges against him therefor are being prepared, and that he will be brought to trial thereon as soon as practicable before a court-martial to be convened by the commanding general of the Department of the Gulf.'

This return was not traversed, and we are not authorized to go outside thereof for the facts in the case. By the return the case is to be controlled by our decisions in Miller v. United States, 114 F. 838, 52 C.C.A. 472, and United States v. Reaves, 126 F. 127, 60 C.C.A. 675.

The judgment of the District Court must be affirmed.

When the charge of desertion against Auburn Moore has been disposed of, or if the military authorities do not proceed thereon within a reasonable delay, the appellants can renew their application for a writ of habeas corpus.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Gibson v. United States Dodez v. Same
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • December 23, 1946
    ...114 F. 838; United States v. Reaves, 5 Cir., 126 F. 127; In re Carver, C.C., 142 F. 623; In re Scott, 6 Cir., 144 F. 79; Moore v. United States, 5 Cir., 159 F. 701; Dillingham v. Booker, 4 Cir., 163 F. 696, 18 L.R.A.,N.S., 956, 16 Ann.Cas. 127; United States ex rel. Laikund v. Williford, 2 ......
  • Ex parte Dunakin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Kentucky
    • January 7, 1913
    ...60 C.C.A. 675; In re Lessard (C.C.) 134 F. 305; In re Carver (C.C.) 142 F. 623; In re Scott, 144 F. 79, 75 C.C.A. 237; Moore v. United States, 159 F. 701, 86 C.C.A. 569; Ex parte Lewkowitz (C.C.) 163 F. 646; Dillingham Booker, 163 F. 696, 90 C.C.A. 280, 18 L.R.A. (N.S.) 956, 16 Ann.Cas. 127......
  • Ex parte Hubbard
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • October 3, 1910
    ...the petition is filed by his parents. Miller's Case, 114 F. 838, 52 C.C.A. 472; Reaves' Case, 126 F. 127, 60 C.C.A. 675; Moore's Case, 159 F. 701, 86 C.C.A. 569; Case, 144 F. 79, 75 C.C.A. 237. See, also, Kaufman's Case (C.C.) 41 F. 876; Dowd's Case (D.C.) 90 F. 718; Lewkowitz' Case (C.C.) ......
  • Ex parte Lewkowitz
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • August 14, 1908
    ...163 F. 646 Ex parte LEWKOWITZ. United States Circuit Court, S.D. New York.August 14, 1908 ... Lewkowitz ... & Schaap (Samuel ... punish. Re Scott, 144 F. 79, 75 C.C.A. 237; Moore v. U.S ... (C.C.A.) 159 F. 701; Re Dowd (D.C.) 90 F. 718; Re Carver ... (C.C.) 142 F. 623 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT