Moore v. Ventnor Gardens, Inc.
Decision Date | 18 March 1930 |
Citation | 149 A. 536 |
Parties | MOORE v. VENTNOR GARDENS, Inc., et al. |
Court | New Jersey Court of Chancery |
Syllabus by the Court.
Suit by Florence J. Moore against Ventnor Gardens, Inc., and others, for strict foreclosure of mortgage.
Decree dismissing the bill advised.
Thompson & Hanstein, of Atlantic City, for complainant.
John D. McMullin, of Moorestown, for defendants Pope, Stokes, and Slape.
Herbert R. Voorhees, of Atlantic City, for defendant Atlantic County Trust Company.
Harvey F. Carr, of Camden, for defendant General Land & Investment Company.
Joseph B. Perskie, of Atlantic City, for defendant Grossman, receiver.
INGERSOLL, Vice Chancellor.
The complainant was the owner of a mortgage upon three tracts of land described as follows:
Thbis mortgage was foreclosed, and at a sale the premises were purchased by the complainant for the sum of $500, and on or about the loth day of October, 1927, the complainant entered into possession of the premises.
Prior to the foreclosure of this mortgage, the state of New Jersey granted to Frank J. Pedrick & Son the riparian rights in the said inside thoroughfare adjoining the premises owned by them (the said Frank J. Pedrick & Son), included in which were the riparian rights adjoining the premises described in complainant's mortgage.
The complainant alleges that the lands adjoining the mortgaged premises and included in said grant are bounded and described as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Stoeco Homes, Inc.
...aff'd, 47 N.J.Eq. 598, 22 A. 1076 (1890); Simpson v. Moorhead, 65 N.J.Eq. 623, 56 A. 887 (Ch.1904); Moore v. Ventnor Gardens, Inc., 105 N.J.Eq. 730, 149 A. 536 (Ch. 1930) aff'd, 109 N.J.Eq. 132, 156 A. 419 (1931); Ross v. Mayor and Council of Borough of Edgewater, 115 N.J.L. 477, 180 A. 866......
-
Leonard v. State Highway Dept.
...&c., Railroad Co., 72 N.J.L. 137, 60 A. 44; Seacoast, &c., Co. v. American Timber Co., 92 N.J.Eq. 219, 113 A. 489; Moore v. Ventnor Gardens, Inc., 105 N.J.Eq. 730, 149 A. 536, affirmed 109 N.J.Eq. 132, 156 A. 419; Mayor, &c., of Hoboken v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 124 U.S. 656, 8 S.Ct. 64......
-
Empire Trust Co. v. Bd. of Commerce and Navigation
...&c, R. Co., 72 N. J.L. 137, 60 A. 44; Seacoast Real Estate Co. v. American Timber Co., 92 N.J.Eq. 219, 113 A. 489; Moore v. Ventnor Gardens, Inc., 105 N.J.Eq. 730, 149 A. 536, affirmed 109 N.J.Eq. 132, 156 A. 419; Mayor, &c. of Hoboken v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 124 U.S. 656, 8 S.Ct. 643......
-
De Felice v. Peace, A--170
...navigable river, as we understand it is, then title to land below the high water mark is probably in the State, Moore v. Ventnor Gardens, 105 N.J.Eq. 730, 149 A. 536 (Ch.1930); affirmed 109 N.J.Eq. 132, 156 A. 419 (E. & A. 1931), and the dock which in most part is over the water, still exte......