Moorer v. Andrews
Decision Date | 06 September 1893 |
Citation | 17 S.E. 948,39 S.C. 427 |
Parties | MOORER et al. v. ANDREWS et al. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Injunction—Damages on Bond.
Defendant, having a contract to supply a certain number of cords of wood a week at a certain price, was enjoined from cutting timber on the land. The injunction being dissolved, held, that his damages were measured by the net profits on the wood he could have delivered while the order stood, but did not include profits he could have made afterwards had not his men strayed off pending the injunction, and he been unable, when it was dissolved, to hire enough men to fill his contract.
Appeal from common pleas circuit court of Orangeburg county; J. B. Kershaw, Judge.
Action by Sarah A. Moorer and Olivia M. Keitt against J. Hesse Andrews and Henrietta H. Keitt to enjoin waste by said Andrews. December 3, 1884, plaintiffs gave bond, and next day injunction was served on said Andrews. December 15, 18841 Andrews obtained a dissolution of the injunction. May 24, 1890, the question of defendant's damages from the injunction were referred to the master of Orangeburg county, and testimony taken. The principal damages claimed were for Andrews' loss on a contract with one George H. Cornelson to cut and deliver 18 cords of wood a week. Andrews claimed a loss of the net profit on 500 cords, at 95 cents net profit, viz. $475, and the master allowed it. On exceptions to the report, the court allowed only $34.20 on said item; that is, the loss accrued during the two weeks that the injunction continued. The portion of the master's report which regards this claim is as follows: Andrews appeals. Affirmed.
Izlar, Glaze & Herbert, for appellant.
Browning S. Dibble, for respondents.
This action was heard by his honor, Judge Kershaw, upon exceptions to the report of the master, and now comes on to be heard in this court upon an appeal from the decree of the circuit judge. It seems that the plaintiffs brought an action in the court of common pleas for Orangeburg county to restrain the defendant Andrews from cutting down and disposing of by sale the timber growing upon a certain tract of land of Which Mrs. Ann C. Andrews was in possession at the time of her death,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
IN RE FARMERS'UNION MERCANTILE CO.
...the dissolution of an injunction or restraining order. Livingston v. Exum, 19 S. C. 223; Hill v. Thomas, 19 S. C. 230; Moorer v. Andrews, 39 S. C. 427, 432, 17 S. E. 948; Britt v. McCormick, 117 S. C. 8, 108 S. E. 179; Chambers v. Long, 132 S. C. 179, 128 S. E. 853. Compare First Nat. Bank ......
-
Shealy's, Inc. v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TEL. CO., Civ. A. No. 3324.
...of the Court, said: "We think the proof was entirely inadequate to sustain the action. Sitton v. Macdonald, 25 S.C. 68; Moorer v. Andrews, 39 S.C. 427, 430, 17 S.E. 948; 8 Am. & Eng. Encyc. 2 Ed., 620; Shearman & Redfield on Negligence, § 745. The telegram itself was merely an invitation to......
-
First Nat. Bank v. H.L. & L.F. McSwain
...1038; Strauss v. Dundon (Tex. Civ. App.) 27 S.W. 503. In Livingston v. Exum, 19 S.C. 223, Hill v. Thomas, 19 S.C. 230, and Moorer v. Andrews, 39 S.C. 427, 17 S.E. 948, was held that a party enjoined might recover a reasonable attorney's fee paid for procuring a dissolution of the injunction......
-
Walker v. Oswald
... ... they are entitled to recover this sum as lost profit, under ... their contract. Moorer v. Andrews, 39 S.C. 427, 17 ... S.E. 948 ... As to ... the amount of damages suffered by the respondent Whitmarsh ... Dunbar ... ...