Morales v. BGK Trademark Holdings, LLC, Opposition 91234467

Decision Date06 July 2020
Docket NumberOpposition 91234467
CourtTrademark Trial and Appeal Board
PartiesVeronica Morales d/b/a Blue Ivy v. BGK Trademark Holdings, LLC

This Opinion is Not a Precedent of the TTAB

Ryan E. Hatch of the Law Office of Ryan E. Hatch, for Veronica Morales d/b/a Blue Ivy.

Marvin S. Putnam of Latham & Watkins LLP, for BGK Trademark Holdings, LLC.

Before Cataldo, Greenbaum, and Lebow, Administrative Trademark Judges.

OPINION
Lebow Administrative Trademark Judge

BGK Trademark Holdings, LLC ("Applicant"), is a Delaware limited liability company that is wholly owned by singer, songwriter, and actress Beyoncé Giselle Knowles-Carter, its sole member.[1] Applicant seeks registration on the Principal Register of the mark BLUE IVY CARTER, the namesake of Mrs. Carter's daughter, in standard characters, for a variety of goods and services in fourteen international classes including:

Fragrances, cosmetics, skin care products, namely non-medicated skin care preparations, non-medicated skin care creams and lotions, namely, body cream, hand cream, skin lotion, body lotions, skin moisturizers, skin emollient, skin cleansing creams, skin cleansing lotions, all for adults and infants; hair care products, namely, non-medicated hair care preparations, non-medicated hair gel, shampoo, conditioner hair mousse, hair oils, hair pomades, hair spray, in International Class 3;

Metal key chains and metal key rings, in International Class 6;

DVDs, CDs, and audio and visual sound recordings featuring musical performances; musical sound recordings; computer application software for mobile phones, portable media players, and handheld computers for use in downloading music, ring tones and video games; handheld and mobile digital electronic devices, namely, tablet PCs, cellular phones, laptops, portable media players, handheld computers; cases and covers for mobile phones and mobile digital electronic devices, namely, laptops, cell phones, radio pagers, mobile computers; downloadable web-based application software in the nature of a mobile application downloadable to handheld and mobile digital electronic devices for use in downloading music, ring tones and video games; decorative magnets, eyewear, eyeglass cases; computer bags; graduated glassware, in International Class 9;
Baby teething rings, in International Class 10;
Baby carriages, baby strollers, in International Class 12;
Books in the field of music, motion pictures, musical performers; photographs; posters; baby books; stickers; print materials, namely, art prints, color prints, concert programs, calendars, pens, post cards; gift bags; paper flags; trading cards; paper baby bibs, in International Class 16;
Bags, namely, tote bags, beach bags, handbags, diaper bags, baby carriers worn on the body, pouch baby carriers, luggage; small leather goods, namely, leather cases, leather bags and wallets, leather purses, leather billfolds, leather key chains, leather key cases, in International Class 18;
Plastic key chains and plastic key rings; small leather goods, namely, leather picture frames, leather key fobs, and leather key holders; plastic flags; vinyl banners, baby bouncers, baby changing mats, baby changing tables, high chairs for babies, playpens for babies, in International Class 20;
Mugs; beverage glassware; plastic water bottles sold empty; hair accessories, namely, hair combs; baby bathtubs; drinking cups for babies, in International Class 21;
Banners of cloth, nylon; flags, namely, cloth flags, nylon flags; towels; baby bedding, namely, bundle bags, swaddling blankets, crib bumpers, fitted crib sheets, crib skirts, crib blankets; baby blankets, in International Class 24;
Hair accessories, namely, hair ties, hair scrunchies, barrettes, hair bands, hair bows, hair clips, hair pins, hair ribbons, ponytail holders; novelty button; hair accessories, namely, electric hair-curlers, other than hand implements, in International Class 26;
Playing cards, balls, namely, basketballs, baseballs, footballs, kick balls, rubber balls, beach balls, golf balls, hand balls, tennis balls, racquet balls, soccer balls, sport balls; dolls, baby multiple activity toys, baby rattles, baby swings, in International Class 28;
Product merchandising for others; online retail store services featuring music, musical recordings, motion pictures, clothing and clothing accessories, novelty items; Entertainment marketing services, namely, marketing, promotion and advertising for recording and performing artists, in International Class 35; and
Entertainment services, namely, providing online video games, dance events by a recording artist, multimedia production services; Entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances; production of motion picture films, fan clubs, in International Class 41.[2]

Veronica Morales ("Opposer") is the owner and founder of a lifestyle event planning company doing business under the name "Blue Ivy."[3] She has opposed registration of Applicant's mark BLUE IVY CARTER on three grounds: (1) that Applicant did not have a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods and services as of the filing date; (2) that the use and registration of Applicant's proposed mark will result in a likelihood of confusion with Opposer's previously registered mark BLUE IVY, in standard characters, for

Event planning and management for marketing, branding, promoting or advertising the goods and services of others; Special event planning for business purposes; Special event planning for commercial, promotional or advertising purposes; Online retail store services and retail store services featuring paintings, wedding portraits and invitations; Personal management services for promotional, corporate and party entertainers, in International Class 35; and
Consultation in the field of special event planning for social entertainment purposes; Special event planning for social entertainment purposes; Party and wedding planning and coordination services; Party and wedding planning consultation services; Providing information in the field of wedding party planning; Rental of party decorations and wedding decorations, in International Class 41;[4]

and (3) that Applicant committed fraud by knowingly submitting a false declaration in support of its claimed bona fide intent to use the mark in commerce with an intent to deceive the USPTO.[5] Applicant denied the salient allegations of the Notice of Opposition.[6] The case is fully briefed.

Opposer bears the burden of establishing her claims by a preponderance of the evidence. See Jansen Enters., Inc. v. Rind, 85 U.S.P.Q.2d 1104, 1107 (TTAB 2007). Having carefully considered the evidentiary record, the parties' arguments and applicable authorities, as explained below, we dismiss the Opposition.

I. The Record

The record includes the pleadings, the file of the opposed application pursuant to Trademark Rule 2.122(b)(1), 37 C.F.R. § 2.122(b)(1), and the following submissions by the parties:

A. Opposer's Notices of Reliance on

• Opposer's first set of interrogatories to Applicant, and original and supplemental responses and objections thereto;[7]
• Opposer's first requests for production of documents and things to Applicant, and original and supplemental responses and objections thereto;[8]
• Internet materials consisting of an October 14, 2013 article, titled "Jay Z Has the Room," from the November 2013 online issue of Vanity Fair magazine;[9]
• Official records consisting of a copy of the application and status of abandoned Application Serial No. 85526099 for the mark BLUE IVY CARTER in the name of Applicant;[10] and
• Official records consisting of a copy of the registration certificate and status of Registration No. 4224833 for the mark BLUE IVY in the name of Opposer.[11]

B. Applicant's Notice of Reliance on

• Screenshots of Opposer's website, Facebook and Twitter pages;[12]
• Opposer's advertising material, and a picture of her mark;[13]
• Audio recording of a portion of a radio show interview of Opposer;[14]
• Applicant's first set of requests for admission to Opposer, and Opposer's responses and objections thereto;[15]
• Applicant's first set of interrogatories to Opposer, and Opposer's responses and objections thereto;[16]
• Applicant's first set of requests for production of documents to Opposer, and Opposer's responses and objections thereto;[17]
April 15, 2017 article from the website Essense.com titled "Blue Ivy's Most Precious Mini Style Moments";[18]
• Emails and letters from third parties to Opposer;[19]
• Screenshots of Google searches of the terms "blue ivy" and "blue ivy events";[20]and
• Registration certificate and file history for Opposer's Registration No. 4224833 for the mark BLUE IVY.[21]
C. Public and confidential declaration and report of Applicant's expert witness, Bruce G. Silverman.[22]
II. Preliminary Issues
A. Opposer's Brief Exhibits and Citations to the Evidence

Opposer attached 191 pages of documents (Exhibits A - K) to her main brief comprising duplicate copies of her discovery requests to Applicant, Applicant's responses thereto, and her registration certificate, which had already been made of record through notices of reliance filed during her testimony period. This was unnecessary and a waste of time. See Trademark Trial And Appeal Board Manual of Procedure (TBMP) § 704.05(b) (timely filed evidence "need not and should not be resubmitted with a party's brief."); ITC Entertainment Group Ltd v. Nintendo of America Inc., 45 U.S.P.Q.2d 2021, 2022-23 (TTAB 1998) (filing duplicative submissions is a waste of time and resources, and is a burden on the Board); Life Zone, Inc. v. Middleman Group, Inc., 87 U.S.P.Q.2d 1953, 1955...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT