Morales v. City of San Rafael, 94-15523

Decision Date13 January 1997
Docket NumberNo. 94-15523,94-15523
PartiesJuan Manuel MORALES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN RAFAEL and Daniel Hulett, Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Before D.W. NELSON, REINHARDT, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.


The order filed January 13, 1997, is ordered PUBLISHED.


January 13, 1997

The opinion filed September 6, 1996, is amended as follows:

1) In the reported opinion, at 96 F.3d 359, 363 (9th Cir.1996), add the following sentence to the end of the first partial paragraph:

"Nominal damages" is not limited to an award in the amount of $1, but includes an award that may properly be classified as "de minimis."

With this amendment to the opinion, a majority of the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor or rehearing en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
61 cases
  • Central Office Telephone, Inc. v. American Tel. and Tel. Co., s. 94-36116
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • 26 February 1997
    ...108 F.3d 981 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1339, 97 Daily D.A.R. 2016 CENTRAL OFFICE TELEPHONE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Nos. 94-36116, 94-36156. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued......
  • Knutson v. Ag Processing, Inc., C01-3015-MWB.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 8th Circuit. Northern District of Iowa
    • 28 July 2003
    ...subsumed in the lodestar calculation." Morales v. City of San Rafael, 96 F.3d 359, 363-64 (9th Cir.1996), amended on other grounds, 108 F.3d 981 (9th Cir.1997) (emphasis It is the court's opinion that counsel's $200 hourly rate is adequate compensation for Mr. Parker's services in this matt......
  • Black v. Akins (In re Akins), Case No. 18-25001-E-7
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Ninth Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of California
    • 19 May 2022
    ...of a professional's fees is the "Lodestar Calculation." Morales v. City of San Rafael , 96 F.3d 359, 363 (9th Cir. 1996), amended, 108 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 1997). Additionally, California courts use the Lodestar method. Ketchum v. Moses , 24 Cal. 4th 1122, 1133-36, 104 Cal.Rptr.2d 377, 17 P.3......
  • Choate v. County of Orange, G020621.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 18 December 2000 fees. Farrar encompasses any de minimis damage award. (See, e.g., Morales v. City of San Rafael (9th Cir.1996) 96 F.3d 359, mod. 108 F.3d 981 ["`Nominal damages' is not limited to an award in the amount of $1, but includes an award that may properly be classified as `de minimis'" ]; Adam......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT