Morales-Villalobos v. Garcia-Llorens

Decision Date14 January 2003
Docket NumberNo. 02-1499.,02-1499.
Citation316 F.3d 51
PartiesAlga MORALES-VILLALOBOS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Miguel GARCIA-LLORENS; Jose Arturo Garcia-Llorens; Manuel Matos; Hospital Dr. Susoni, Inc.; Dr. Susoni Health Community Services, Inc.; Arecibo Respiratory Care, Inc., Defendants, Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit

Alvaro R. Calderon, Jr., with whom John E. Mudd was on the brief, for appellant.

Luis A. Oliver, with whom Fiddler González & Rodríguez LLP, McConnell Valdés, and Roberto C. Quiñones Rivera were on the brief, for appellees.

Before LYNCH, Circuit Judge, HOWARD, Circuit Judge, and Milton I. SHADUR,* Senior District Judge.

LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

Dr. Alga Morales-Villalobos, an anesthesiologist, brought antitrust claims under 15 U.S.C. § 1 (2000) (Section 1 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act) and pendent state law claims against her former employers, the overlapping directors of an anesthesiology group and two hospitals. She alleged that the exclusive dealing arrangement between the hospitals and the group prevented her from competing to offer her services. She also alleged that the defendants engaged in a group boycott to exclude her from the anesthesiology group, which had an exclusive contract at local hospitals, and subsequently denied her certification to practice at those hospitals.

The defendants moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim, which the court allowed, with leave to amend. Morales-Villalobos then filed an amended complaint amplifying her allegations. The district court granted the motion to dismiss the amended complaint, holding that Morales-Villalobos had failed to sufficiently allege the relevant geographic market and an antitrust injury. Morales Villalobos v. García Lloréns, 193 F.Supp.2d 401, 405-09 (D.P.R.2002)(opinion and order). We reverse, though sympathetic to the difficulties posed by this area of law.

I.

We review de novo a district court's dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Chute v. Walker, 281 F.3d 314, 318 (1st Cir.2002). "We accept as true the well-pleaded factual allegations of the complaint draw all reasonable inferences therefrom in the plaintiff's favor and determine whether the complaint, so read, [may] justify recovery on any cognizable theory." Martin v. Applied Cellular Tech., Inc., 284 F.3d 1, 6 (1st Cir.2002). "The issue is whether the complaint states a claim under the Sherman Act, assuming the factual allegations to be true and indulging to a reasonable degree a plaintiff who has not yet had an opportunity to conduct discovery." DM Research, Inc. v. Coll. of Am. Pathologists, 170 F.3d 53, 55 (1st Cir.1999).

The facts as described in plaintiff's complaint are as follows. Morales-Villalobos is an anesthesiologist living in the town of Arecibo, approximately 56 miles west of San Juan. In July 1995 she became an employee of Arecibo Respiratory Care, Inc., ("ARC") one of the co-defendants. ARC provided anesthesiology services under an exclusive contract to the two hospitals in Arecibo performing surgeries: Hospital Dr. Susoni ("HDS") and Hospital Regional de Arecibo Cayetano Coll y Toste, which was managed by a subsidiary of HDS, Dr. Susoni Health Community Services. This subsidiary later purchased that hospital outright. The complaint provides no information on the length of the exclusive contract. The co-defendantsMiguel García-Lloréns, José Arturo García-Lloréns, and Manuel Matos — are the sole shareholders of ARC and members of the Board of Directors of HDS. ARC is, in turn, the majority shareholder of HDS. José Arturo García-Lloréns and Manuel Matos are themselves certified anesthesiologists.

Morales-Villalobos alleges that José Arturo García-Lloréns, Miguel García-Lloréns, and Manuel Matos were all involved — as HDS directors — in the decision to award an exclusive contract to ARC; indeed, no other HDS board members participated in the decision. The complaint alleges that the exclusive contract between ARC and HDS was motivated by corrupt self-dealing between the directors and stockholders of the two corporations, several of whom are themselves anesthesiologists and presumably benefitted from the exclusive agreement. The inference may be drawn that the reasons for the arrangement, accordingly, were not competitive. Morales-Villalobos received medical privileges as a physician at HDS in September 1995, which appear to have extended to the Hospital Regional de Arecibo as well. In September 1997, her privileges were renewed at HDS and the Hospital Regional de Arecibo for a further two years.

On December 1, 1998, Morales-Villalobos was fired from her position at ARC by Miguel García-Lloréns, the President of ARC, despite the absence of patient complaints (as alleged in the complaint, which we must take to be true). The following year, Morales-Villalobos was not recertified for privileges at HDS. Because of ARC's exclusive arrangement with HDS, once plaintiff was fired by ARC, she could not find work as an anesthesiologist at either hospital in Arecibo. HDS also rejected a request by Dr. Ramos Escoda, Morales-Villalobos's former husband and a surgeon who practices in Arecibo, to have her administer anesthesia to his private surgery patients at HDS. Other physicians in the area have also indicated their willingness to use Morales-Villalobos's services, but are prevented from doing so at these hospitals. Moreover, HDS prevented Morales-Villalobos from entering the medical facility by placing fliers on the walls and posting security guards at the hospital doors.

Morales-Villalobos alleges that HDS and the Hospital Regional de Arecibo have "complete market power" in the Arecibo region, because they are able to offer a complete line of medical services, and because they are the only hospitals approved as Medicare providers. They are the only hospitals within the Health Region of Arecibo, as defined by the Health Reform Program of the Government of Puerto Rico, which provides medical care for indigent patients. Patients covered under the Health Reform Program are not allowed to seek services in San Juan or other cities in Puerto Rico. Morales-Villalobos alleges she provides Medicare services to patients of Dr. Escoda. Half of the total revenue received by the Arecibo hospitals comes from Medicare, which provides health coverage for individuals 65 years old or older, 42 U.S.C. § 1395c (2002). An inference may be drawn that such patients are less likely to be able to make a 56-mile trip to hospitals in San Juan.

The other health region relatively near Arecibo is the Manatí Health Region, which encompasses the city of Manatí, in which there are three hospitals at which surgery is performed. Morales-Villalobos says it would be impossible for her to practice in Manatí, because all of these hospitals have exclusive contracts with anesthesiology groups. Perhaps more importantly, her referring physicians in the Arecibo region do not have privileges in Manatí.

Morales-Villalobos also alleges that the quality of patient care has worsened as a result of ARC's exclusive contract. She cites understaffing, with one anesthesiologist routinely expected to cover two geographically-separated hospitals, and nurses administering anesthesia without the supervision of an anesthesiologist. She also alleges an increase in cost relative to other sectors of the market.

Morales-Villalobos alleges that she has been blocked from practicing anesthesiology in Arecibo, her hometown, and that she has also...

To continue reading

Request your trial
30 cases
  • Steward Health Care Sys., LLC v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Island
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Rhode Island
    • 19 February 2014
    ...to plead a relevant product market.” Todd v. Exxon Corp., 275 F.3d 191, 199–200 (2d Cir.2001); see also Morales–Villalobos v. Garcia–Llorens, 316 F.3d 51, 55 (1st Cir.2003) (“[W]hile there are arguments for a larger [geographic] market, the matter cannot be resolved on the face of the compl......
  • Sterling Merch. Inc. v. Nestle
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Puerto Rico
    • 23 June 2010
    ...standard includes “but-for causation,” leading to a direct injury resulting from anti-competitive activity. Morales-Villalobos v. Garcia-Llorens, 316 F.3d 51, 55 (1st Cir.2003); see also SAS of P.R., Inc. v. P.R. Tel. Co., 48 F.3d 39, 43 (1st Cir.1995). The Sterling damages model asks this ......
  • U.S. ex rel. Karvelas v. Melrose-Wakefield Hosp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • 23 February 2004
    ...We review de novo the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Morales-Villalobos v. Garcia-Llorens, 316 F.3d 51, 52 (1st Cir.2003). We accept the plaintiff's well-pleaded facts as true and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff.......
  • Arroyo-Melecio v. Puerto Rican American Ins. Co., 04-1045.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • 14 February 2005
    ...to apportion. We cannot say, at the Rule 12(b)(6) stage, that the plaintiffs have no antitrust standing. See Morales-Villalobos v. Garcia-Llorens, 316 F.3d 51, 55-56 (1st Cir.2003). As to several of the criteria, we note that the plaintiffs here are consumers and as such are presumptively f......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Proving Antitrust Damages. Legal and Economic Issues. Third Edition Part III
    • 8 December 2017
    ...Fed. Appx. 7 (1st Cir. 2005), 79 Montreal Trading v. AMAX, Inc., 661 F.2d 864 (10th Cir. 1981), 273 Morales-Villalobos v. Garcia-Llorens, 316 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2003), 33 Morelock Enters. v. Weyerhaeuser Co., No. CV-04-583-PA, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28270 (D. Or. 2004), 295 Morning Pioneer v.......
  • Antitrust Injury and Standing
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Proving Antitrust Damages. Legal and Economic Issues. Third Edition Part I
    • 8 December 2017
    ...to bring § 1 claim against producers and networks limiting his appearances). 44. See, e.g. , Morales-Villalobos v. Garcia-Llorens, 316 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2003) (finding that anesthesiologist alleging exclusive contract prohibited her from practicing at hospitals failed to allege sufficient a......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Antitrust Health Care Handbook, Fourth Edition
    • 1 February 2010
    ...U.S. 752 (1984), 46, 203 Moore v. Williamsburg Reg’l Hosp., 560 F.3d 166 (4th Cir. 2009), 112, 113 Morales-Villalobos v. Garcia-Llorens, 316 F.3d 51 (Ist Cir. 2003}, 213 Morgan, Strand, Wheeler & Biggs v. Radiology, Ltd., 924 F.2d 1484 (9th Cir. 1991), 86 Morgenstern v. Wilson, 29 F.3d 1291......
  • Nonprice Conduct in Health Care Industries
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Antitrust Health Care Handbook, Fourth Edition
    • 1 February 2010
    ...positions over a large geographic area. If, on the other hand, the patient 50. affected market.”); Morales-Villalobos v. Garcia-Llorens, 316 F.3d 51, 55 (ist Cir. 2003) (noting, in a hospital-physician exclusive contract challenge, that “substantial foreclosure is ordinarily a requirement f......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT