Moran v. Stewart

Decision Date18 March 1903
Citation173 Mo. 207,73 S.W. 177
PartiesMORAN v. STEWART.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Andrew County; A. D. Burnes, Judge.

Suit by Angie Moran against Samuel Stewart. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

This is a suit for dower by the plaintiff, the widow of David Moran, who died March 13, 1892, testate, seised of an estate of inheritance in the land, to wit, the S. E. quarter of section 29, the S. W. quarter of section 28, the W. half of the S. E. quarter of section 28; the S. W. quarter of the N. W. quarter, and the S. W. quarter of the N. E. quarter, and the north half of the S. E. quarter of the N. E. quarter of section 28, township 60, range 34—containing 500 acres, more or less. Four thousand dollars damages for detention of dower are also claimed. The defendant is son of the deceased, adopted by deed dated April 17, 1889, which was long prior to his marriage to the plaintiff.

The defense is: That, in addition to the lands described in the petition, David Moran owned certain other lands described, amounting to 106 acres. That on February 5, 1891, being 30 years old, and David Moran being 70 years old, and they two contemplating marriage, entered into the following antenuptial contract:

"Marriage Contract.

"Article of agreement by and between David Moran, party of the first part, and Angie Fox, party of the second part, this 5th day of February, 1891. Witnesseth, that whereas, said parties contemplate entering into the marriage relation with each other. And whereas, each of said parties own property in their own right.

"Now, therefore, in consideration of the said contemplated marriage, it is mutually agreed that the said party of the second part is to retain as her absolute property free from any claim or right of her said husband, all the property, real and personal, which she now has or may hereafter acquire by inheritance or otherwise; that her said property shall not in any way become liable for her support while she shall remain the wife of the said party of the first part; that she shall have the right to sell, assign, transfer, convey or dispose of by will or otherwise of any or all of her said property as she may deem best.

"It is further mutually agreed, in consideration of said marriage that the second party waives and relinquishes all her marital rights under the laws of this state, and waives, releases, and quitclaims all her right of dower and homestead in all the property both real and personal which the party of the first part now owns or may hereafter acquire or own, and all claims for support, maintenance or dower and homestead which she would have against the estate of the said David Moran after his death in the event of her surviving him as his widow.

"It is further mutually agreed in consideration of said marriage and of the premises aforesaid, that said second party shall have the control, use, rents and profits and possession of the real estate hereinafter described, after the death of the said David Moran (if she survive him) during her life or as long as she shall remain his widow, to-wit: [Here follows a description of the 106 acres of land before referred to.]

"It is mutually agreed that said second party shall accept said interest in said real estate as full satisfaction of and in lieu of all claim for dower and homestead in any or all of the real estate of which said David Moran is now seized in law or equity, or may at any time become seized during coverture, he may have at death.

"That said David Moran shall have absolute control of all his property of every kind and description, except said 106 acre tract aforesaid, free from any claim of his said wife and sell, assign, transfer, convey and dispose of the same without her joining in any deed therefor. That he shall sell and convey the same by his separate deed or dispose of the same by will or otherwise as he may deem best. That it shall not be necessary for said second party to join in any deed, contract, or conveyance he may take to any real estate except the tract herein described. That said Angie shall pay the taxes and insurance on said real estate herein described after the death of the said David Moran (if she shall survive him) as long as she shall remain the widow of said David Moran and use said real estate under this contract, and her right to the use of said real estate shall terminate with her death or widowhood.

"Given under our hands and seals this 5th day of February, 1891.

                      "[Signed]   David Moran.   [Seal.]
                      "[Signed]   Angie Fox.     [Seal.]"
                

Which said contract was duly acknowledged.

The defendant further pleads that the plaintiff accepted the provisions of the antenuptial contract, and after the death of her husband she entered upon the possession of the land therein described, and has ever since occupied, used, and enjoyed it, and hence she is concluded and estopped from claiming dower in the land described in the petition. The defendant further pleads that the plaintiff has received $3,000, being one-third of the personal estate, and that the rents, issues, and profits of the 106 acres are reasonably worth $500 a year. The defendant further pleads that within one year after the death of her husband she elected to take one-half of the real estate, subject to the payment...

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • Rieger v. Schaible
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Nebraska
    • March 5, 1908
    ......See Faris v. Coleman, 103 Mo. 352, 15 S. W. 767;Moran v. Stewart, 173 Mo. 207, 73 S. W. 177;King v. King, 184 Mo. 99, 82 S. W. 101;Coulter v. Lyda, 102 Mo. App. 401, 76 S. W. 720, where Mowser v. Mowser, ......
  • Cartall v. St. Louis Union Trust Co., 37102 and 37103.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • July 25, 1941
    ...estoppel, by such conduct. Fitts v. Cook, 5 Cush. 596; Hauser v. Murrey, 256 Mo. 58; Stone v. Gillian, 81 Mo. App. 9; Moran v. Stewart, 173 Mo. 207; McBride v. Bank & Trust Co., 330 Mo. 259; First State Bank v. Braden, 39 S.D. 53; Peck v. Peck, 137 Pac. 137; Natl. Match Co. v. Storage & Ice......
  • Rieger v. Schaible
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Nebraska
    • March 5, 1908
    ...... the one announced in this opinion. See Farris v. Coleman , 103 Mo. 352, 15 S.W. 767; Moran v. Stewart , 173 Mo. 207, 73 S.W. 177; King v. King , 184 Mo. 99, 82 S.W. 101; Coulter v. Lyda ,. 102 Mo.App. 401, 76 S.W. 720, where Mowser v. ......
  • Lane v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • March 10, 1947
    ......(2) This rule applies to. legal jointures. 28 C.J. 122, Sec. 54, Note 58. (3) As well. as to equitable jointures. Ibid, page 124, Note 73; Moran. v. Stewart, 173 Mo. 207, 73 S.W. 177. (4) Succession is. governed by the law of the place where the decedent was. domiciled at the time of her ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT