Moran v. Stewart
Decision Date | 18 March 1903 |
Citation | 173 Mo. 207,73 S.W. 177 |
Parties | MORAN v. STEWART. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Andrew County; A. D. Burnes, Judge.
Suit by Angie Moran against Samuel Stewart. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
This is a suit for dower by the plaintiff, the widow of David Moran, who died March 13, 1892, testate, seised of an estate of inheritance in the land, to wit, the S. E. quarter of section 29, the S. W. quarter of section 28, the W. half of the S. E. quarter of section 28; the S. W. quarter of the N. W. quarter, and the S. W. quarter of the N. E. quarter, and the north half of the S. E. quarter of the N. E. quarter of section 28, township 60, range 34—containing 500 acres, more or less. Four thousand dollars damages for detention of dower are also claimed. The defendant is son of the deceased, adopted by deed dated April 17, 1889, which was long prior to his marriage to the plaintiff.
The defense is: That, in addition to the lands described in the petition, David Moran owned certain other lands described, amounting to 106 acres. That on February 5, 1891, being 30 years old, and David Moran being 70 years old, and they two contemplating marriage, entered into the following antenuptial contract:
Which said contract was duly acknowledged.
The defendant further pleads that the plaintiff accepted the provisions of the antenuptial contract, and after the death of her husband she entered upon the possession of the land therein described, and has ever since occupied, used, and enjoyed it, and hence she is concluded and estopped from claiming dower in the land described in the petition. The defendant further pleads that the plaintiff has received $3,000, being one-third of the personal estate, and that the rents, issues, and profits of the 106 acres are reasonably worth $500 a year. The defendant further pleads that within one year after the death of her husband she elected to take one-half of the real estate, subject to the payment...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rieger v. Schaible
......See Faris v. Coleman, 103 Mo. 352, 15 S. W. 767;Moran v. Stewart, 173 Mo. 207, 73 S. W. 177;King v. King, 184 Mo. 99, 82 S. W. 101;Coulter v. Lyda, 102 Mo. App. 401, 76 S. W. 720, where Mowser v. Mowser, ......
-
Cartall v. St. Louis Union Trust Co., 37102 and 37103.
...estoppel, by such conduct. Fitts v. Cook, 5 Cush. 596; Hauser v. Murrey, 256 Mo. 58; Stone v. Gillian, 81 Mo. App. 9; Moran v. Stewart, 173 Mo. 207; McBride v. Bank & Trust Co., 330 Mo. 259; First State Bank v. Braden, 39 S.D. 53; Peck v. Peck, 137 Pac. 137; Natl. Match Co. v. Storage & Ice......
-
Rieger v. Schaible
...... the one announced in this opinion. See Farris v. Coleman , 103 Mo. 352, 15 S.W. 767; Moran v. Stewart , 173 Mo. 207, 73 S.W. 177; King v. King , 184 Mo. 99, 82 S.W. 101; Coulter v. Lyda ,. 102 Mo.App. 401, 76 S.W. 720, where Mowser v. ......
-
Lane v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
......(2) This rule applies to. legal jointures. 28 C.J. 122, Sec. 54, Note 58. (3) As well. as to equitable jointures. Ibid, page 124, Note 73; Moran. v. Stewart, 173 Mo. 207, 73 S.W. 177. (4) Succession is. governed by the law of the place where the decedent was. domiciled at the time of her ......