Moreland v. United States

Decision Date22 June 1965
Docket NumberNo. 8003.,8003.
Citation347 F.2d 376
PartiesEmeary MORELAND, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit

Emeary Moreland, Jr., pro se.

Richard T. Spriggs, Asst. U. S. Atty., Denver, Colo. (Lawrence M. Henry, U. S. Atty., Denver, Colo., with him on the brief), for appellee.

Before PICKETT, LEWIS and SETH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant Moreland was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado of the crime of armed robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2114. His conviction was affirmed. Moreland v. United States, 10 Cir., 270 F.2d 887. This proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 attacks the judgment and sentence on the ground that Moreland's arrest by state officers without a warrant was in violation of his constitutional rights. We find no error in the trial court's dismissal of the petition without a hearing.

An illegal arrest without more does not void a conviction and is not grounds for collateral attack under Section 2255. Tanner v. United States, 10 Cir., 296 F.2d 218; Roddy v. United States, 10 Cir. 296 F.2d 9; Klink v. Looney, 10 Cir., 262 F.2d 119; Whitney v. Zerbst, 10 Cir., 62 F.2d 970.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Walker v. State
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • November 7, 1968
    ...States, 273 U.S. 593, 606, 47 S.Ct. 531, 71 L.Ed. 793 (1927); Cox v. United States, 351 F.2d 280 (8th Cir. 1965); Moreland v. United States, 347 F.2d 376 (10th Cir. 1965); Jones v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 326, 258 F.2d 420 (1958) cert. den. 357 U.S. 932, 78 S.Ct. 1377, 2 L.Ed.2d 137......
  • United States ex rel. Orsini v. Reincke
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Connecticut
    • February 2, 1968
    ...is not ground for a collateral attack by habeas corpus is well established whether the conviction was by a federal, Moreland v. United States, 347 F.2d 376 (10th Cir. 1965); Roddy v. United States, 296 F.2d 9 (10th Cir. 1961), or a state court. United States ex rel. Burgett v. Wilkins, 283 ......
  • State v. Addington
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • July 17, 1970
    ...Kan. 602, 419 P.2d 865; State v. Dobney, 199 Kan. 449, 429 P.2d 928; Wheeler v. State, 202 Kan. 134, 446 P.2d 777; Moreland v. United States, 347 F.2d 376 (10 Cir.1965); Davis v. United States, 416 F.2d 960 (10 Cir.1969); United States ex rel. Ali v. Deegan, 298 F.Supp. 398 (S.D.N.Y., 1969)......
  • Jackson v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • February 26, 1971
    ...arrest, without more, does not void a conviction and is not grounds for a collateral attack under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Moreland v. United States, 347 F.2d 376 (10 Cir. 1965); Hayes v. United States, 419 F.2d 1364 (10 Cir. Petitioner's second ground, that his conviction was obtained by the use ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT