Moreno v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

• Decision Date: 17 November 1995
• Docket Number: Nos. 94-1231,94-1247,s. 94-1231
• Citation: 70 F.3d 433
• Parties: Charles MORENO, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

Page 433

70 F.3d 433

Charles MORENO, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 94-1231, 94-1247.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 17, 1995.

Prior report: 63 F.3d 1404.

Before MERRITT, Chief Judge; KENNEDY, MARTIN, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.