Moreno v. United States, 48754.

Decision Date07 November 1950
Docket NumberNo. 48754.,48754.
Citation118 Ct. Cl. 30,93 F. Supp. 607
PartiesMORENO v. UNITED STATES.
CourtU.S. Claims Court

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, MADDEN and HOWELL, Judges.

La Vern R. Dilweg, Washington, D. C., Robert H. McNeill and T. Bruce Fuller, Washington, D. C., on the briefs, for plaintiff.

Paris T. Houston, Washington, D. C., H. G. Morison, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant.

MADDEN, Judge.

The plaintiff sues for pay which, he claims, accrued to him as an officer in the Phillippine Scouts, a part of the Army of the United States. He is a naturalized citizen of the United States, born in the Philippines. He served as a private or non-commissioned officer in that unit from 1924 until February 7, 1942, on which date he was made a Second Lieutenant. He was taken prisoner by the Japanese Army on April 9, 1942, and was held in prison until June 28, 1942, when he was released on parole after having signed a pledge, entitled an oath, to his captors. The text of the pledge is quoted in our finding 2. After his release on parole by the Japanese he lived with his family while recuperating from malaria and beriberi until September 1942 when he moved to another place where he lived with friends and worked at harvesting rice as soon as he was strong enough. On April 10, 1943, he went to still another place in the Philippines where he went to work as chief watchman for a corporation set up by the Japanese. There he joined a local unarmed guerrilla band which was in an inactive status. He was promoted to a position as purchaser at a buying station of the corporation and held this position until October 31, 1944. In April 1944 the guerrilla group referred to was disbanded.

About October 31, 1944, the plaintiff again joined an unarmed local guerrilla unit and was an officer in it, remaining so until he returned to American military control on January 28, 1945. The guerrilla units to which the plaintiff belonged were not authorized nor approved by the American Army. No recognized guerrilla commander requested or authorized the plaintiff to accept the employment which he had with the Japanese created corporation.

On January 28, 1945, the American Army, having recaptured the Philippines, resumed military control of its former personnel. Proof of the plaintiff's loyalty was required and furnished. This proof was satisfactory to the Army. After several conflicting determinations as to the status of the plaintiff during the period of Japanese occupation, on April 28, 1948, the Commanding General, Headquarters, Philippines Ryukyus Command, to whom had been delegated authority for final action on the status of missing persons in the Philippines, made a final determination that the plaintiff was not in a casualty status during the period from October 1, 1942 to January 1, 1945. As a consequence of that determination the plaintiff has not been paid or that period, and he sues for that pay.

The plaintiff's claim is based upon the Missing Persons Act of March 7, 1942, C. 166, 56 Stat. 143, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix Sections 1001 through 1015. We quote sections 1002 and 1006 and the pertinent parts of section 1009.

"§ 1002. Missing, interned, or captive persons; continuance of pay and allowances

"Any person who is in active service and who is officially determined to be absent in a status of missing, missing in action, interned in a neutral country, captured by an enemy, beleaguered or besieged shall, for the period he is officially carried or determined to be in any such status, be entitled to receive or to have credited to his account the same pay and allowances to which he was entitled at the beginning of such period of absence or may become entitled thereafter, and entitlement to pay and allowances shall terminate upon the date of receipt by the department concerned of evidence that the person is dead or upon the date of death prescribed or determined under provisions of section 5 of this Act (section 1005 of this Appendix): Provided, That such entitlement to pay and allowances shall not terminate upon expiration of term of service during absence and in case of death during absence shall not terminate earlier than the dates herein prescribed: Provided further, That there shall be no entitlement to pay and allowances or any period during which such person may be officially determined absent from his post of duty without authority and he shall be indebted to the Government for any payments from amounts credited to his account for such period. Mar. 7, 1942, c. 166, § 2, 56 Stat. 144, as amended July 1, 1944, c. 371, § 2, 58 Stat. 679."

"§ 1006. Same; payment of allotments in case of captured or interned persons until death or return to jurisdiction; pay and allowances and allotments of persons continued in missing status

"When it is officially reported by the head of the department concerned that a person missing under the conditions specified in section 2 of this Act (section 1002 of this Appendix) is alive and in the hands of an enemy or is interned in a neutral country, the payments authorized by section 3 of this Act (section 1003 of this Appendix) are, subject to the provisions of section 2 of this Act (section 1002 of this Appendix), authorized to be made for a period not to extend beyond the date of the receipt by the head of the department concerned of evidence that the missing person is dead or has returned to the controllable jurisdiction of the department concerned. When a person missing or missing in action is continued in a missing status under section 5 of this Act (section 1005 of this Appendix), such person shall continue to be entitled to have pay and allowances credited as provided in section 2 of this Act (section 1002 of this Appendix) and payments of allotments, as provided in section 3 of this Act (section 1003 of this Appendix), are authorized to be continued, increased, or initiated. Mar. 7, 1942, c. 166, § 6, 56 Stat. 145, as amended Dec. 24, 1942, c. 828, § 1, 56 Stat. 1092."

"§ 1009. Determinations by department heads or designees; conclusiveness relative to status of personnel, payments, or death

"The head of the department concerned, or such subordinate as he may designate, shall have authority to make all determinations necessary in the administration of this Act sections 1001-1017 of this Appendix, and for the purposes of this Act sections 1001-1017 of this Appendix determinations so made shall be conclusive as to death or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Crone v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Claims Court
    • 9 Julio 1976
    ...Emphasis added. To similar effect are Alpuerto v. United States, 152 Ct.Cl. 270, 271 (1961), and Moreno v. United States, 93 F.Supp. 607, 610, 118 Ct.Cl. 30, 43-44 (1950), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 814, 72 S.Ct. 29, 96 L.Ed. 616 No discourse is required here to perceive the difference between ......
  • McDonald v. McLucas
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 13 Febrero 1974
    ...can be cured by subsequent judicial review. Assuming, arguendo, that such review is even available under this statute (see, Moreno v. United States, 93 F.Supp. 607 (Ct.Claims 1950), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 814, 72 S.Ct. 29, 96 L.Ed. 616 (1951); cf., Ferrer v. United States, 140 F.Supp. 954 (......
  • Almour v. Pace
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 23 Noviembre 1951
    ...698; Kimberly v. United States, 97 F.Supp. 710, 119 Ct.Cl. 805; Hamrick v. United States, Ct.Cl., 96 F.Supp. 940; Moreno v. United States, 93 F.Supp. 607, 118 Ct.Cl. 30, certiorari denied 72 S.Ct. 29. We make no prediction, of course, as to the action which the Court of Claims might take if......
  • Bell v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Claims Court
    • 2 Marzo 1960
    ...pay and allowances under this Act shall be conclusive. A.R. 35-1325, dated July 15, 1953. We held in the case of Moreno v. United States, 1950, 93 F.Supp. 607, 118 Ct. Cl. 30, certiorari denied 342 U.S. 814, 72 S.Ct. 29, 96 L.Ed. 616, that under the provisions of section 1009, supra, of the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT