Morgan v. Baunach
Decision Date | 06 June 1984 |
Docket Number | No. A8201-00582,A8201-00582 |
Citation | 684 P.2d 589,68 Or.App. 496 |
Parties | Margaret Ann MORGAN and Rebecca Kay Schorzman, Respondents, v. John R. BAUNACH, Cleo A. Baunach, Exchange Partner, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Miriam Wood, John S. Wood, Olympia Danae Wood, Charles Howard and Lucy Howard, Defendants, Donald E. Johnston, Marjorie J. Johnston, Werner Talmon-L'Armee and Karen B. Talmon-L'Armee, Appellants. ; CA A26744. |
Court | Oregon Court of Appeals |
Ronald Allen Johnston, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were John F. Reynolds and McCormick & Reynolds, Portland.
J. Bradford Shiley, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.
Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.
This appeal involes two parcels of commercial real estate and the respective parties' rights to them under Agreements to Purchase and leases executed the same day. Plaintiffs brought an action in ejectment seeking to recover possession of the properties and damages for wrongful withholding and failure to make lease payments. Defendants Johnston counterclaimed for specific performance of the Agreements to Purchase. After a trial without a jury, the court ruled that plaintiffs were entitled to immediate possession of the properties and denied defendants' counterclaim. The court also awarded damages against defendants Johnston and defendants Talmon-L'Armee for wrongful withholding, and against defendants Baunach for failure to make lease payments. Only the Johnstons and the Talmon-L'Armees appeal. Because we conclude that the trial court improperly characterized the transaction and the legal obligations flowing therefrom, we reverse.
On November 17, 1976, plaintiffs, as vendors, and defendants Baunach, as vendees, executed the following "Agreement to Purchase" the Lori-Dell Apartment complex:
The parties also executed a substantially identical "Agreement to Purchase" the Cross Roads apartment complex. Almost simultaneously, plaintiffs and defendants Baunach executed lease agreements, whereby the Baunachs agreed to lease each complex for a five-year period, from November 17, 1976, to November 17, 1981. Under the terms of the leases, the Baunachs agreed to assume and pay all sums due under the terms of the mortgage on each property, to pay an additional monthly rental charge and to undertake various other standard lease obligations.
In March, 1981, defendants Baunach attempted to tender full payment under the Agreements to Purchase, but plaintiffs refused the tender, stating that they were not obligated to accept payment until November 17, 1981. On April 15, 1981, defendants Baunach sold their interest under the Agreement to Purchase relating to Lori-Dell to Exchange Partners, Inc. (EPI), which immediately assigned its rights to defendants Johnston. On April 27, 1981, the Baunachs conveyed their interest in Cross Roads to a syndicate of investors, who forthwith assigned their rights to defendants Talmon-L'Armee.
As of November 17, 1981, the amounts due plaintiffs under the Agreements to Purchase were approximately $96,000 on the Lori-Dell complex and $71,000 on Cross Roads. Although all mortgage payments had been made through that date, lease payments were not made after October, 1981. On November 1, 1981, the Baunachs' attorney, Tarlow, offered plaintiffs either $50,000 or $80,000 in cash (it is not clear from the record), plus certain contract equities claimed to be worth about $180,000, to conclude both transactions. On November 30, 1981, Smith, plaintiffs' attorney, wrote Tarlow, stating that the offer was being considered and that it was his understanding that the Baunachs were unable to pay the balance owing. During the month of December, 1981, plaintiffs rejected the Baunachs' offer and a subsequent offer. At trial, Smith testified that both before and after November 17, 1981, Tarlow had informed him that the Baunachs could not, and would not, perform. Tarlow denied having made those statements, and John Baunach denied having authorized Tarlow to make any such remarks. On January 7, 1982, Smith advised Tarlow that, because the Baunachs had failed to make timely payment, their interests had automatically ceased and that plaintiffs desired to take immediate possession of the properties. This action followed.
On March 1, 1982, the Baunachs renewed their November 1, 1981, offer by letter, stating, "We would appreciate your consideration of this offer as we simply have no other way to pay you the cash at this time." Plaintiffs rejected that offer.
On April 7, 1982, the Baunachs assigned all their interests in the Lori-Dell Agreement to Purchase to defendants Johnston, who thereafter offered plaintiffs $96,101 and then $96,359 for Lori-Dell. After also acquiring the various interests in Cross Roads, on November 10, 1982, defendants Johnston offered plaintiffs $71,000 for that complex. Plaintiffs...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wandler v. Lewis
...v. Cheney, 16 Neb. 202, 20 N.W. 222, 223 (1884); Nielsen v. Baldridge, 173 Or. 555, 146 P.2d 754, 758-59 (1944); Morgan v. Baunach, 68 Or.App. 496, 684 P.2d 589, 595 (1984). Not only was Wandler able to pay the remaining amount due, but Lewis, as the trial court found, was also not harmed f......
-
Estate of Brewer by First Nat. Bank of Oregon v. Iota Delta Chapter, Tau Kappa Epsilon Fraternity, Inc., 80-0890-NJ-2
...is not entitled to notice of default and a defined opportunity to cure before a forfeiture may be effected. Morgan v. Baunach, 68 Or.App. 496, 684 P.2d 589 (June 6, 1984). It is also clear that, as a general proposition, the holder of an equitable mortgage acquires no greater interest than ......
-
Morgan v. Baunach
...997 685 P.2d 997 297 Or. 547 Morgan v. Baunach NO. S30880 Supreme Court of Oregon AUG 08, 1984 68 Or.App. 496, 684 P.2d 589 ...