Morgan v. Flexner

CourtAlabama Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.
CitationMorgan v. Flexner, 105 Ala. 356, 16 So. 716 (Ala. 1894)
Decision Date19 December 1894
PartiesMORGAN v. FLEXNER ET AL.

Appeal from circuit court, Butler county; John P. Hubbard, Judge.

Action by Flexner & Lichten against A. L. Morgan. Plaintiffs had judgment, and from an order overruling defendant's motion to vacate the judgment, and quash a writ of venditioni exponas issued thereon, defendant appeals. Appeal dismissed.

J. M Whitehead, for appellant.

J. C Richardson, for appellee.

McCLELLAN J.

Motions were made by A. L. Morgan in the circuit court to set aside a judgment rendered some years previously in that court, on the ground that said judgment was void, and also to quash and set aside a venditioni exponas issued upon said alleged void judgment a short time before the motions were made. At the end of these motions as copied into the transcript is the following: "(16) Refused, and movant excepts, and is given 40 days from adjournment of court to present bill of exceptions. Hubbard, Judge." This entry, obviously copied from the trial docket, is assumed by the appellant to be a judgment of the court overruling and denying their motions, and from it, as such, this appeal is prosecuted. But it is not a judgment, but only a docket memorandum...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
21 cases
  • State v. Scott
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • June 22, 1926
    ... ... hence no execution could lawfully have been issued. Wynn ... v. McCraney, 156 Ala. 630 46 So. 854. In Morgan v ... Flexner, 105 Ala. 356 16 So. 716, it was held that an ... entry upon the trial docket by the judge upon the hearing of ... a motion, ... ...
  • Ex parte Brandon
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • January 14, 1943
    ... ... v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee, 26 Ala.App ... 197, 156 So. 858; Randall v. Worthington, 141 Ala ... 497, 37 So. 594; Morgan v. Flexner & Lichten, 105 Ala ... 356, 16 So. 716 ... The ... order entered by Judge Bailes on May 4, 1942, although not in ... the ... ...
  • Lamont v. Marbury Lumber Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • May 14, 1914
    ...Ala. Mid. Ry. Co., 123 Ala. 227, 26 So. 165; Baker v. Swift, 87 Ala. 530, 6 So. 153; Park v. Lide, 90 Ala. 246, 7 So. 805; Morgan v. Flexner, 105 Ala. 356, 16 So. 716; Long v. Holley, 157 Ala. 514, 47 So. Crawford v. Crawford, 119 Ala. 34, 24 So. 727; Hereford v. Combs, 126 Ala. 369, 28 So.......
  • Ex parte Louisville & N.R. Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • April 29, 1926
    ...Ala. 135, 39 So. 249; Ala.Nat. Bank v. Hunt, 125 Ala. 512, 28 So. 488; McDonald v. A.M.R. Co., 123 Ala. 228, 26 So. 165; Morgan v. Flexner, 105 Ala. 356, 16 So. 716; Bell v. Otto, 101 Ala. 187, 13 So. 43, 46 117. And in this jurisdiction the period of limitation begins to run from the time ......
  • Get Started for Free