Morgan v. Flexner
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | McCLELLAN, J. |
| Citation | Morgan v. Flexner, 105 Ala. 356, 16 So. 716 (Ala. 1894) |
| Decision Date | 19 December 1894 |
| Parties | MORGAN v. FLEXNER ET AL. |
Appeal from circuit court, Butler county; John P. Hubbard, Judge.
Action by Flexner & Lichten against A. L. Morgan. Plaintiffs had judgment, and from an order overruling defendant's motion to vacate the judgment, and quash a writ of venditioni exponas issued thereon, defendant appeals. Appeal dismissed.
J. M Whitehead, for appellant.
J. C Richardson, for appellee.
Motions were made by A. L. Morgan in the circuit court to set aside a judgment rendered some years previously in that court, on the ground that said judgment was void, and also to quash and set aside a venditioni exponas issued upon said alleged void judgment a short time before the motions were made. At the end of these motions as copied into the transcript is the following: This entry, obviously copied from the trial docket, is assumed by the appellant to be a judgment of the court overruling and denying their motions, and from it, as such, this appeal is prosecuted. But it is not a judgment, but only a docket memorandum...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
State v. Scott
... ... hence no execution could lawfully have been issued. Wynn ... v. McCraney, 156 Ala. 630 46 So. 854. In Morgan v ... Flexner, 105 Ala. 356 16 So. 716, it was held that an ... entry upon the trial docket by the judge upon the hearing of ... a motion, ... ...
-
Ex parte Brandon
... ... v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee, 26 Ala.App ... 197, 156 So. 858; Randall v. Worthington, 141 Ala ... 497, 37 So. 594; Morgan v. Flexner & Lichten, 105 Ala ... 356, 16 So. 716 ... The ... order entered by Judge Bailes on May 4, 1942, although not in ... the ... ...
-
Lamont v. Marbury Lumber Co.
...Ala. Mid. Ry. Co., 123 Ala. 227, 26 So. 165; Baker v. Swift, 87 Ala. 530, 6 So. 153; Park v. Lide, 90 Ala. 246, 7 So. 805; Morgan v. Flexner, 105 Ala. 356, 16 So. 716; Long v. Holley, 157 Ala. 514, 47 So. Crawford v. Crawford, 119 Ala. 34, 24 So. 727; Hereford v. Combs, 126 Ala. 369, 28 So.......
-
Ex parte Louisville & N.R. Co.
...Ala. 135, 39 So. 249; Ala.Nat. Bank v. Hunt, 125 Ala. 512, 28 So. 488; McDonald v. A.M.R. Co., 123 Ala. 228, 26 So. 165; Morgan v. Flexner, 105 Ala. 356, 16 So. 716; Bell v. Otto, 101 Ala. 187, 13 So. 43, 46 117. And in this jurisdiction the period of limitation begins to run from the time ......