Morgan v. Flexner
Decision Date | 19 December 1894 |
Citation | 16 So. 716,105 Ala. 356 |
Parties | MORGAN v. FLEXNER ET AL. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Butler county; John P. Hubbard, Judge.
Action by Flexner & Lichten against A. L. Morgan. Plaintiffs had judgment, and from an order overruling defendant's motion to vacate the judgment, and quash a writ of venditioni exponas issued thereon, defendant appeals. Appeal dismissed.
J. M. Whitehead, for appellant.
J. C. Richardson, for appellee.
Motions were made by A. L. Morgan in the circuit court to set aside a judgment rendered some years previously in that court, on the ground that said judgment was void, and also to quash and set aside a venditioni exponas issued upon said alleged void judgment a short time before the motions were made. At the end of these motions as copied into the transcript is the following: This entry, obviously copied from the trial docket, is assumed by the appellant to be a judgment of the court overruling and denying their motions, and from it, as such, this appeal is prosecuted. But it is not a judgment, but only a docket memorandum of the presiding judge, intended and operating merely as a direction to the clerk as to what judgment should be entered on the records of the court. It may never have been acted on by the clerk, and will not support an appeal or an assignment of error. Baker v. Swift, 87 Ala. 530, 6 So. 153; Park v. Lide, 90 Ala. 246, 7 So. 805. The motion to dismiss the appeal must therefore prevail.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Scott
... ... hence no execution could lawfully have been issued. Wynn ... v. McCraney, 156 Ala. 630 46 So. 854. In Morgan v ... Flexner, 105 Ala. 356 16 So. 716, it was held that an ... entry upon the trial docket by the judge upon the hearing of ... a motion, ... ...
-
Ex parte Brandon
... ... v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee, 26 Ala.App ... 197, 156 So. 858; Randall v. Worthington, 141 Ala ... 497, 37 So. 594; Morgan v. Flexner & Lichten, 105 Ala ... 356, 16 So. 716 ... The ... order entered by Judge Bailes on May 4, 1942, although not in ... the ... ...
-
Lamont v. Marbury Lumber Co.
...Ala. Mid. Ry. Co., 123 Ala. 227, 26 So. 165; Baker v. Swift, 87 Ala. 530, 6 So. 153; Park v. Lide, 90 Ala. 246, 7 So. 805; Morgan v. Flexner, 105 Ala. 356, 16 So. 716; Long v. Holley, 157 Ala. 514, 47 So. Crawford v. Crawford, 119 Ala. 34, 24 So. 727; Hereford v. Combs, 126 Ala. 369, 28 So.......
-
Ex parte Louisville & N.R. Co.
...Ala. 135, 39 So. 249; Ala.Nat. Bank v. Hunt, 125 Ala. 512, 28 So. 488; McDonald v. A.M.R. Co., 123 Ala. 228, 26 So. 165; Morgan v. Flexner, 105 Ala. 356, 16 So. 716; Bell v. Otto, 101 Ala. 187, 13 So. 43, 46 117. And in this jurisdiction the period of limitation begins to run from the time ......