Morgan v. Hunt

Decision Date18 June 1928
Citation220 N.W. 224,196 Wis. 298
PartiesMORGAN v. HUNT ET AL.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Dane County; August C. Hoppmann, Circuit Judge. Reversed.

Action begun August 18, 1927, by Anna Morgan against George Hunt and his insurance carrier, the General Casualty Company, to recover for personal injuries sustained when the plaintiff was struck by an automobile driven by the defendant Hunt. From an order entered December 22, 1927, striking out a plea in abatement, the defendants appealed.

The policy issued to defendant Hunt by the General Casualty Company, to insure him against loss or expense resulting from claims for personal injuries caused by the automobile operated by him, contained the provision:

“No action shall lie against the company until the amount of damages for which the assured is liable by reason of any casualty covered by this policy is determined, either by final judgment against the assured or by agreement between the assured and the plaintiff with the written consent of the company.”

The plaintiff joined the casualty company as defendant in an action, without first procuring a judgment against the defendant Hunt, as required by this provision of the policy. The casualty company interposed a plea in abatement on the ground that the action was prematurely brought. On motion of the plaintiff, the circuit court struck out the plea in abatement.Richmond, Jackman, Wilkie & Toebaas, of Madison, for appellants.

A. H. Bushnell and Hill, Thomann & Beckwith, all of Madison, for respondent.

Joseph A. Padway, of Milwaukee, amicus curiæ.

STEVENS, J.

This appeal presents the question whether the provision of the policy quoted above is in conflict with section 85.25 of the Statutes, which provides:

“Any bond or policy of insurance covering liability to others by reason of the operation of a motor vehicle shall be deemed and construed to contain the following conditions: That the insurer shall be liable to the persons entitled to recover for the death of any person, or for injury to person or property, because of the negligent operation, maintenance, use or defective construction of the vehicle described therein, such liability not to exceed the amount named in said bond or policy.”

2. This statute was considered in Ducommun v. Inter-State Exchange, 193 Wis. 179, 212 N. W. 289, 214 N. W. 616;Bro v. Standard Accident Ins. Co., 194 Wis. 293, 215 N. W. 431;Fanslau v. Rogan, 194 Wis. 8, 215 N. W. 589. It was there determined that this statute required such policies as that here in question to be construed as contracts of indemnity which impose upon...

To continue reading

Request your trial
32 cases
  • Estate of Otto v. Physicians Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • July 3, 2008
    ...company until the liability of its insured had been determined, we held that provision was dispositive. See, e.g., Morgan v. Hunt, 196 Wis. 298, 300, 220 N.W. 224 (1928) (concluding that § 85.25 (1925) "does not create a liability or confer any right of action where none exists under the te......
  • McArthur v. Maryland Casvalts Co.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 6, 1939
    ...of N. Y., 162 So. 724; Lowery v. Zorn, 168 So. 297; Morrell v. LaLonde, 114 A. 178; Stone v. Inter-State Exchange, 229 N.W. 26; Morgan v. Hunt, 220 N.W. 224; Bergstein v. Popkin, 233 N.W. 572; Sweitzer v. Fox, 275 N.W. 546. The courts of last resort of the state of Louisiana have uniformly ......
  • Anderson v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • November 8, 1946
    ...by the insured's negligence unless he had first recovered a judgment against the insured establishing his liability. Morgan v. Hunt, 196 Wis. 298, 220 N.W. 224. After the decision in the Morgan case, § 85.93 was amended to read as it now does, providing that the insurer shall be directly li......
  • Suschnick v. Underwriters Cas. Co.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • May 9, 1933
    ...In the policy involved herein, there was no such “no action” clause as there was in the policy under consideration in Morgan v. Hunt, 196 Wis. 298, 220 N. W. 224;Grandhagen v. Grandhagen, 199 Wis. 315, 225 N. W. 935;Milwaukee v. Boynton Cab Co., 201 Wis. 581, 229 N. W. 28, 231 N. W. 597;Ber......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT