Morgan v. State
Decision Date | 12 May 1939 |
Docket Number | A-9495. |
Citation | 90 P.2d 683,66 Okla.Crim. 205 |
Parties | MORGAN v. STATE. |
Court | United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma |
Syllabus by the Court.
1.Where a court is in the actual and rightful possession of the office, and is discharging the duties of the same, the fact that, in giving his bond, he failed to give a bond in the amount required by statute, does not render his judicial acts void; and the action of the court in exercising jurisdiction in a criminal case cannot be inquired into collaterally, but only in a direct proceeding at the instance of the State.
2.An officer de facto is one whose acts, though not those of a lawful officer, the law upon principles of policy and justice will hold valid so far as they involve the interests of the people and third persons, where the functions of the office are exercised by one who is in actual possession of it under color of title.
3.The evidence is sufficient to sustain the judgment.
4.The defendant's motion to disqualifythe court was properly overruled.
5.There are no errors in the record warranting this court in reversing the case.
Appeal from County Court, Coal County; W. B. Thornsbrough, Judge.
William Morgan was convicted of drunkenness in a public place, and he appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
H. M Shirley, of Coalgate, for plaintiff in error.
Mac Q Williamson, Atty. Gen., and Jess L. Pullen, Asst. Atty. Gen for the State.
The defendant was tried in the County Court of Coal County, upon information filed against him charging him with being drunk in a public place, on Main Street of the City of Coalgate, was convicted, and sentenced to pay a fine of $10 and costs.
Walter Clark, testifying for the State, stated:
Sam Shore stated that he was a constable in Coal County, and that he saw the defendant on the 12th of April, 1937, in the middle of the street.
P. J. Barnett was called as a witness on behalf of the defendant; stated,
On cross examination the witness stated that Billy Morgan was put in jail about dusk, maybe a little bit later.
Jim Barnett stated that he was serving time for making liquor.
On cross-examination the witness stated he could tell he had been drinking by his actions.
Slim McGehee, a witness for the defendant, stated:
Billy Morgan, testifying in his own behalf, stated:
E. Pritchard, testifying for the defendant, stated:
Marvin Balch was called and testified as follows: "I dismissed the charge against the defendant in the justice court and refiled it in the county court."
William Morgan, the defendant, was recalled and testified as follows ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
House v. Town of Dickson
...at 738. Further, the legal existence of a de facto court acting under color of law is not subject to collateral attack. Morgan v. State, 66 OK CR 205, 90 P.2d 683 (1939); Cullins v. Overton, 1898 OK 43, ¶ 14, 54 P. 702, 706 (Indian Terr.). Whether the Dickson municipal court entered a final......
-
Lizar v. State
...154 P. 356; Ex parte Crump, 10 Okl.Cr. 133, 135 P. 428, 47 L.R.A.,N.S., 1036; Sheldon v. Green, 182 Okl. 208, 77 P.2d 114; Morgan v. State, 66 Okl.Cr. 205, 90 P.2d 683; Bethel v. State, 8 Okl.Cr. 61, 126 P. Mahaffey v. Territory of Oklahoma, 11 Okl. 213, 66 P. 342; Hisaw v. State, 13 Okl.Cr......
-
Torrance v. Bladel
...his office, is without merit, and cannot be considered in this case where the interests of third parties are involved. See Morgan v. State, 66 Okl.Cr. 205, 90 P.2d 683; Franks v. Ponca City, 170 Okl. 134, 38 P.2d 912. Under the evidence as shown by the record we are inclined to the view tha......
-
Cox v. State
... ... justice of the peace de facto. In acting as an officer de ... facto, what was the effect of his acts as to the interests of ... the people and third persons? This court has passed squarely ... upon that question. Where one is acting as an officer de ... facto, in Morgan v. State, 66 Okl.Cr. 205, 90 P.2d ... 683, 685, this court said in the body of the opinion: ... 'Beginning ... with the early opinions of this court, it has been repeatedly ... held and defined that an officer de facto is one whose acts, ... though not those of a lawful ... ...