Morgan v. State, No. 88-1196

CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)
Writing for the CourtBASKIN
Citation14 Fla. L. Weekly 2447,550 So.2d 151
Parties14 Fla. L. Weekly 2447 Andre MORGAN and Anthony Morgan, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Decision Date17 October 1989
Docket NumberNo. 88-1196

Page 151

550 So.2d 151
14 Fla. L. Weekly 2447
Andre MORGAN and Anthony Morgan, Appellants,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-1196.
District Court of Appeal of Florida,
Third District.
Oct. 17, 1989.

Page 152

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and John H. Lipinski and Maria Brea Lipinski, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellants.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Patricia Ann Ash, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

BASKIN, Judge.

Andre Morgan and Anthony Glenn Morgan appeal their convictions and sentences for trafficking in cocaine, possession of cocaine, unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense, and for carrying a concealed weapon. 1 We affirm the convictions and reverse the sentences.

The Morgans allege they were denied due process of law and deprived of their right to effective assistance of counsel by their joint representation by one attorney. Their argument is without merit. The Morgans did not object in the trial

Page 153

court to joint representation. They have also failed to point out specific instances in which an actual conflict of interest affected their attorney's representation. Foster v. State, 387 So.2d 344 (Fla.1980); Boutwell v. State, 530 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 538 So.2d 1255 (Fla.1988); Davis v. State, 461 So.2d 291 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Baker v. State, 217 So.2d 880 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969); Rogers v. State, 212 So.2d 367 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968), cert. discharged, 219 So.2d 685 (Fla.1969); see also Bellows v. State, 508 So.2d 1330 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Furthermore, counsel was not court appointed, but was privately retained. Because they chose dual representation, appellants may not now complain. Davis v. State, 209 So.2d 701 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968).

Challenging their sentences, the Morgans allege that the trial court erred in utilizing juvenile adjudications to depart from the sentencing guidelines. An extensive record of juvenile adjudications may provide sufficient reason for departure from the guidelines, Williams v. State, 504 So.2d 392 (Fla.1987); Musgrove v. State, 524 So.2d 715 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), but three prior juvenile convictions are insufficient to support departure. Blue v. State, 541 So.2d 736 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Musgrove v. State, 524 So.2d 715 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Jones v. State, 501 So.2d 665 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), decision approved, 530 So.2d 53 (Fla.1988). Additionally, when the state offers prior convictions of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 practice notes
  • Tarawneh v. State, No. 88-2191
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • May 16, 1990
    ...considered on direct appeal because the prejudice is apparent. See Fasano v. State, 548 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Morgan v. State, 550 So.2d 151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). But see Healey v. State, 556 So.2d 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). They maintain that their theories of defense were mutually an......
  • Larzelere v. State, No. 81793
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • March 28, 1996
    ...show prejudice in the form of actual conflict to succeed in a subsequent claim for ineffective assistance of counsel); Morgan v. State, 550 So.2d 151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Second, appellant had no right to have different counsel appointed after the trial judge found no existing conflict of in......
  • State v. Orozco, s. 91-2090
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • October 6, 1992
    ...for a traffic infraction was not pretextual because defendant was arrested for an offense committed in the officer's presence. Charlton, 550 So.2d at 151. In the case before us, defendants were not known to the police officers prior to the surveillance. The sole reason defendants were follo......
  • Velez v. State, No. 91-792
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • April 7, 1992
    ...to justify departure sentence where offenses showed persistent, escalating pattern of criminal conduct or behavior); Morgan v. State, 550 So.2d 151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (juvenile offenses formed basis for finding of escalating pattern of criminal conduct) Accordingly, we affirm both the judgm......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
  • Tarawneh v. State, No. 88-2191
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • May 16, 1990
    ...considered on direct appeal because the prejudice is apparent. See Fasano v. State, 548 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Morgan v. State, 550 So.2d 151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). But see Healey v. State, 556 So.2d 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). They maintain that their theories of defense were mutually an......
  • Larzelere v. State, No. 81793
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • March 28, 1996
    ...show prejudice in the form of actual conflict to succeed in a subsequent claim for ineffective assistance of counsel); Morgan v. State, 550 So.2d 151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Second, appellant had no right to have different counsel appointed after the trial judge found no existing conflict of in......
  • State v. Orozco, s. 91-2090
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • October 6, 1992
    ...for a traffic infraction was not pretextual because defendant was arrested for an offense committed in the officer's presence. Charlton, 550 So.2d at 151. In the case before us, defendants were not known to the police officers prior to the surveillance. The sole reason defendants were follo......
  • Velez v. State, No. 91-792
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • April 7, 1992
    ...to justify departure sentence where offenses showed persistent, escalating pattern of criminal conduct or behavior); Morgan v. State, 550 So.2d 151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (juvenile offenses formed basis for finding of escalating pattern of criminal conduct) Accordingly, we affirm both the judgm......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT