Morra v. White

Decision Date10 October 2000
CitationMorra v. White, 276 AD2d 536, 714 N.Y.S.2d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
PartiesVICTOR MORRA, Appellant,<BR>v.<BR>MERGANTINE WHITE, Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Bracken, J.P., Thompson, S. Miller and Florio, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff, Victor Morra, was allegedly injured when he slipped and fell on snow and ice at a construction site managed by the defendant, Mergantine White (hereinafter Mergantine). At the time of the accident the plaintiff was walking across an open lot to perform his duties taking water readings. As the plaintiff was not engaged in the construction project, he is not within the class of persons entitled to protection under Labor Law § 241 (6) (see, Jock v Fien, 80 NY2d 965; Shields v St. Marks Hous. Assocs., 230 AD2d 903; Koch v E.C.H. Holding Corp., 248 AD2d 510, 512).

Moreover, the Industrial Code regulations relied upon by the plaintiff, specifically, 12 NYCRR 23-1.33 (d) (1); 23-1.7 (d) and (e), are inapplicable to this case where the plaintiff slipped in an open area of the construction site, and not within a defined walkway or passageway (see, Constantino v Kreisler Borg Florman Gen. Constr. Co., 272 AD2d 361; Motyka v Ogden Martin Sys., 272 AD2d 980; Bauer v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 249 AD2d 948).

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Smith v. The City of New York
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • November 28, 2018
    ... ... City of ... New York, 39 A.D.3d 731 [2d Dept 2007]; Roberts v ... Worth Constr., Inc., 21 A.D.3d 1074, 1077 [2d Dept ... 2005]; Morra v. White, 276 A.D.2d 536, 537 [2d Dept ... 2000]; Rose v. A. Servidone, Inc., 268 A.D.2d 516, ... 517-518 [2d Dept 2000]). Since plaintiff did ... ...
  • Doran v. JP Walsh Realty Grp., LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • July 16, 2018
    ...Dev. Corp., 296 A.D.2d 441 [2d Dept. 2002]; Rose v. A. Servidone, Inc., 268 A.D.2d 516, 702 NYS2d 603 [2d Dept. 2000]; Morra v. White, 276 A.D.2d 536 [2d Dept. 2000]; Burkoski v. Structure Tone, Inc., 40 AD3d 378 [1st Dept. 2007]; Muscadelle v. Herbert Constr. Co., Inc., 265 A.D.2d 264 [1st......
  • Alfano v. LC Main, LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 18, 2013
    ...of this regulation ( see Roberts v. Worth Construction, Inc., 21 A.D.3d 1074, 1077, 802 N.Y.S.2d 177 [2d Dept 2005]; Morra v. White, 276 A.D.2d 536, 537 [2d Dept 2000] ). However, the plaintiff's photographs depicting the area where the accident occurred show a dedicated path through a fenc......
  • Mancini v. Pedra Construction, 01-01950
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 1, 2002
    ...site (see Lawyer v Hoffman, 275 A.D.2d 541). Accordingly, the Labor Law § 241(6) claim was also properly dismissed (see Morra v White, 276 A.D.2d 536; Randazzo v Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y., 271 A.D.2d The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit. FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, McGINITY......
  • Get Started for Free