Morris v. Duby

Decision Date29 October 1926
Docket NumberNo. 372,372
Citation273 U.S. 641,47 S.Ct. 109,71 L.Ed. 818
PartiesR. B. MORRIS, doing business as Morris and Lowther, H. M. Hewitt and Lew Nunamaker, etc., et al., appellants, v. William DUBY, H. B. Van Duzer, and W. H. Malone, etc. *
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Messrs. W. R. Crawford and Edwin C. Ewing, both of Seattle, Wash., for appellant.

Mr. I. H. Van Winkle, of Salem, Or., for appellees.

It is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the decree of the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon, in this cause, be, and the same is hereby, vacated without costs to either party, and that this cause be, and the same is hereby, remanded to the said District Court with directions to dismiss the bill of complaint on the ground that this case has become moot through the rescission of the assailed order of the Oregon State Highway Commission, subject, however, to leave to the appellants to move for the vacation of this decree within thirty days herefrom if they question the rescission of such order.

* Decree vacated 273 U. S. 651, 47 S. Ct. 334, 71 L. Ed. —.

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • U.S. v. MacDonald & Watson Waste Oil Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • 2 Octubre 1990
  • U.S. v. Weiner
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 15 Mayo 1978
  • Fuller v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 12 Febrero 1959
    ... ... This jury law has been upheld as constitutional by this court. Morris v. State, 234 Ala. 520, 175 So. 283; Vaughn v. State, 236 Ala. 442, 183 So. 428; Dyer v. State, 241 Ala. 679, 4 So.2d 311.' ...         We ... ...
  • U.S. v. Brien
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • 28 Abril 1980
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • THE COLORADO APPELLATE RULES
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Appellate Handbook (CBA) Appendices
    • Invalid date
    ...supersedeas bond as principal. Buchhalter v. Solomon, 78 Colo. 227, 241 P. 718 (1925), appeal dismissed, 273 U.S. 640, 47 S. Ct. 106, 71 L. Ed. 818 (1926). Bond in form of cost bond not within rule. A bond in the form prescribed by § 13-16-101 for a cost bond is not a supersedeas bond and i......
  • Rule 8 STAY OR INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL.
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedure (CBA)
    • Invalid date
    ...supersedeas bond as principal. Buchhalter v. Solomon, 78 Colo. 227, 241 P. 718 (1925), appeal dismissed, 273 U.S. 640, 47 S. Ct. 106, 71 L. Ed. 818 (1926). Bond in form of cost bond not within rule. A bond in the form prescribed by § 13-16-101 for a cost bond is not a supersedeas bond and i......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT