Morris v. State, Pet. Docket No. 3.
| Court | Court of Appeals of Maryland |
| Citation | 414 Md. 330,995 A.2d 296 |
| Docket Number | Pet. Docket No. 3. |
| Parties | FRANKLIN MORRIS v. STATE. |
| Decision Date | 14 May 2010 |
FRANKLIN MORRIS
v.
STATE.
Pet. Docket No. 3.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Granted May 14, 2010.
Petition for writ of certiorari petition on behalf of Public Defender granted and petition filed pro-se is denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
Smith v. State Of Md.
...holding that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction. We granted Smith's petition for a writ of certiorari, 414 Md. 330, 995 A.2d 296 (2009), to consider the following question:Is proof of presence in a house where marijuana is being smoked sufficient to sustain a conviction f......
-
Morris v. State , 34
...not harm the appellant any more than the evidence already admitted.” We granted Morris's petition for writ of certiorari. Morris v. State, 414 Md. 330, 995 A.2d 296 (2010). Based on the parties' briefs, as well as their oral arguments, there exists confusion, however, over what issues are a......
-
State Of Md. v. Mayers, 30
...threat of force," under Section 3-306(a) of the Criminal Law Article, 2 to sustain a conviction. We granted certiorari, State v. Mayers, 414 Md. 330, 995 A.2d 296 (2010), to answer the following question, which we have rephrased for clarity: Was there sufficient evidence to sustain Mayers's......
-
State v. Mayers
...of force," under Section 3-306(a) of the Criminal Law Article,2 to sustain a conviction. We417 Md. 452granted certiorari, State v. Myers, 414 Md. 330, 995 A.2d 296 (2010), to answer the following question, which we have rephrased for clarity:Was there sufficient evidence to sustain Mayers's......
Request a trial to view additional results