Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.

Citation130 S.Ct. 2869
Decision Date24 June 2010
Docket NumberNo. 08-1191.,08-1191.
PartiesRobert MORRISON, et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD. et al.
CourtUnited States Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

Thomas A. Dubbs, for petitioners.

George T. Conway, III, for respondents.

Matthew D. Roberts, for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of the Court, supporting respondents.

Justice Sotomayor recused.

Eric Seiler, Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman LLP, New York, NY, A. Graham Allen, Rogers Towers, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, George T. Conway, III, Counsel of Record, John F. Lynch, Carrie M. Reilly, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York, NY, for Respondents.

Samuel Issacharoff, New York, NY, Thomas A. Dubbs, Counsel of Record, James W. Johnson, Richard W. Joffe, Barry M. Okun, Labaton Sucharow LLP, New York, NY, for petitioners.

Justice SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court.

We decide whether

To continue reading

Request your trial
84 cases
  • CONSERVANCY of Sw. Fla. v. UNITED States FISH, Case No. 2:10-cv-106-FtM-SPC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida
    • April 6, 2011
    ...matter jurisdiction of the court. Subject matter jurisdiction relates to the court's power to adjudicate a case. Morrison v. Nat'l Austl. Bank Ltd., 130 S. Ct. 2869, 2877 (2010); Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick, 130 S. Ct. 1237, 1243 (2010). Plaintiffs assert federal jurisdiction under 28 U......
  • United States v. Burwell, No. 06-3070
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • August 3, 2012
    ......Pollack were on the brief of amicus curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Inc. in support of ... Judge: Appellant Bryan Burwell was part of a crew of bank robbers that engaged in a violent crime spree across the ... See, e.g., Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd., 130 S. Ct. 2869, 2877-78 ......
  • Kaw Nation of Oklahoma v. United States, No. 06-934L
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • February 29, 2012
    ...... one of the effective date provisions in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Act, 42 U.S.C. § ...2003)); Ruth Calderon-Cardona v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 2011 WL 6155987, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 7, 2011). Not ... See BedRoc Ltd., LLC v. United States, 541 U.S. 176, 187 n.8 (2004); see ... to do so." Frankfurter, supra, at 535; see also Morrison v. Nat'l Australia Bank Ltd., 130 S.Ct. 2869, 2880 (2010) ......
  • Kaw Nation of Oklahoma v. United States
    • United States
    • Court of Federal Claims
    • February 29, 2012
    ...... one of the effective date provisions in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Act, 42 U.S.C. § ...2003)); Ruth Calderon-Cardona v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 2011 WL 6155987, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 7, 2011). Not ... See BedRoc Ltd., LLC v. United States, 541 U.S. 176, 187 n.8 (2004); see ... to do so." Frankfurter, supra, at 535; see also Morrison v. Nat'l Australia Bank Ltd., 130 S.Ct. 2869, 2880 (2010) ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 firm's commentaries
  • Second Circuit Applies Morrison v. National Australia Bank To Allow Certain Extraterritorial Application Of RICO
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • May 16, 2014
    ...States. In doing so, the Second Circuit addressed the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd., 130 S. Ct. 2869 (2010) [blog article here], which held that United States statutes are presumed not apply to extraterritorial conduct, unless Congress has ......
  • Second Circuit Applies Morrison To Criminal Prosecution Under Section 10(B) And Rule 10b-5
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • October 29, 2013
    ...In so holding, the Second Circuit made clear that the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd., 130 S. Ct. 2869 (2010) [blog article here], that civil liability under Section 10(b) does not apply extraterritorially, extends to criminal conduct as well......
  • SEC Staff Issues Report On The Cross-Border Scope Of Private Rights Of Action For Securities Fraud
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • May 16, 2012
    ...The study, mandated by Congress following the United States Supreme Court's decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd., 130 S. Ct. 2869 (2010), outlines a number of legislative options for extending the scope of private actions for international securities fraud that may provide a......
  • September 2014 Corporate Alert
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • October 1, 2014
    ...Whistleblower Protections In a decision further clarifying the Supreme Court's ruling in Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. (130 S. Ct. 2869), the Second Circuit recently held that whistleblower protection provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act do not apply to extraterritorial conduct, even......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT