Morrissette v. State
Decision Date | 17 April 1917 |
Docket Number | 2 Div. 166 |
Citation | 75 So. 177,16 Ala.App. 32 |
Parties | MORRISSETTE v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Rehearing Denied May 15, 1917
Appeal from Circuit Court, Dallas County; J.B. Evans, Judge.
Oscar Morrissette was convicted of an assault with intent to murder, and appeals. Affirmed.
The following charges were refused to defendant:
The person assaulted was Lovell Givan.
Arthur M. Pitts and Craig & Craig, all of Selma, for appellant.
W.L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and P.W. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Charge 1 refused to the defendant ignores the burden resting upon him, essential to his right to plead self-defense, to show that he was in impending peril of life or limb at the time he fired on Givan with a deadly weapon. It also assumes that Givan, after defendant's withdrawal in good faith, pursued him, or renewed the difficulty and became the assailant. Brewer v. State, 160 Ala. 66, 49 So. 336.
Charge 2, as worded, has a tendency to mislead to the conclusion that the court entertained the view that Givan assaulted or threatened to assault defendant. It was subject to the further objection that it predicated the right of self-defense on a "threatened assault made by him," leaving out of consideration the presence of an overt act or attempt to carry into effect such "threatened assault," thereby producing impending peril, real or apparent, to the defendant's life or limb.
There was no exception to the oral charge of the court, and no objection to the verdict of the jury or the action of the court in sentencing the defendant, and hence nothing to review. McPherson v. State (Sup.) 73 So. 387; Woodson v. State, 170 Ala. 87, 54 So. 191.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Stone v. State
...State ex rel. Smith (Montgomery v. State) 204 Ala. 389, 85 So. 785; Ross v. State, 16 Ala. App. 393, 78 South. 309; Morrissette v. State, 16 Ala. App. 32, 75 So. 177. fact that the accused was under arrest at the time of the confession did not render his declarations inadmissible, after a p......
-
Moss v. State
...44 (1907); Baldwin v. State, 27 Ala.App. 259, 260, 170 So. 349, 350, cert. denied, 233 Ala. 138, 170 So. 350 (1936); Morrisette v. State, 16 Ala.App. 32, 33, 75 So. 177, 178, cert. denied, Ex parte Morrisette, 200 Ala. 488, 76 So. 430 (1917). "It is axiomatic that a trial court will not be ......
- Cain v. State
-
Durham v. State
... ... Wigmore on Ev., Sec. 110; Garner v. State, 28 Fla ... 113, 9 So. 835; 29 Am. St. Rep. 232.) Hence an instruction ... asked which omits the question of an overt act to carry into ... effect a threatened assault, has been held to have been ... properly refused. (Morrissette v. State, 16 Ala.App ... 32, 75 So. 177.) The instruction asked in the case at bar is ... subject to the same objection, particularly in view of the ... prominence therein given to the subject of threats. Further, ... it is entirely silent on the subject as to how the jury is to ... determine ... ...