Morrow v. Dillard
Decision Date | 27 October 2017 |
Docket Number | 2160343 |
Citation | 257 So.3d 316 |
Parties | Melvin MORROW v. Lametrius Josenna DILLARD |
Court | Alabama Court of Civil Appeals |
Alabama Supreme Court 1170119
Brittney S. Bragg, Montgomery, for appellant.
Brandon Wooten of Wooten Law Firm, LLC, Selma, for appellee.
Melvin Morrow ("the husband") appeals from a judgment of the Dallas Circuit Court ("the trial court") that, among other things, divorces him from Lametrius Josenna Dillard ("the wife"), grants the wife sole physical custody of the parties' child, divides the husband's retirement benefits, awards attorney's fees, and awards half of the husband's prospective worker's compensation settlement benefits to the wife as child support. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment in part, reverse the judgment in part, and remand the cause for further proceedings.
The wife filed a complaint for a divorce in the trial court on July 19, 2016. In her complaint, the wife asserted that she and the husband had been ceremonially married on July 30, 2011. She also asserted that the parties "had resided together as husband and wife for some years prior" to their ceremonial marriage. The wife also asserted that the parties had a 10-year-old child, that she should receive sole physical custody of the child, that the husband should be ordered to pay child support, that she should receive one-half of the husband's prospective worker's compensation benefits, and that she should receive one-half of the husband's retirement benefits.
On October 20, 2016, the wife moved for a default judgment. The wife attached to her motion an affidavit from her attorney in which he testified, among other things, that the husband had been personally served by the Dallas County Sheriff on August 23, 2016, with a copy of the summons and complaint for a divorce and that the husband had failed to answer or otherwise defend the wife's complaint. On November 1, 2016, the wife submitted an affidavit entitled "Default Testimony" in which she testified, in part:
On November 1, 2016, the trial court entered a "default decree" that divorced the parties based on incompatibility of temperament and granted sole physical custody of the parties' child to the wife. The trial court also ordered, among other things:
On November 10, 2016, the husband filed a motion seeking to set aside the November 1, 2016, default judgment. In the motion, the husband claimed that he and the wife had been living together during the proceedings, that a hearing had been held on the wife's application for a default judgment without the knowledge of the husband, and that the wife had concealed the existence of that hearing. The husband also asserted, among other things, that he had not been properly served with the complaint and that the judgment violated § 25–5–86(2), Ala. Code 1975, with regard to the award of worker's compensation benefits. Only the first page of the husband's motion is contained in the record on appeal. On November 11, 2016, the trial court entered an order granting the husband's motion to set aside the default judgment and setting a hearing for January 30, 2017.
On January 26, 2017, the wife filed a motion seeking to have the trial court reconsider its order granting the husband's motion to set aside the default judgment. On January 30, 2017, the trial court entered an order stating that a hearing had been held and directing the parties to submit proposed orders within 10 days.
On February 3, 2017, the trial court entered the following order:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
A.M. v. M.G.M.
...is the best interests and welfare of the children.’" Steed v. Steed, 877 So. 2d 602, 604 (Ala. Civ. App. 2003)." Morrow v. Dillard, 257 So. 3d 316, 324 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017). In T.N.S.R. v. N.P.W., 170 So. 3d 684, 687 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014), the father of a child born out of wedlock agreed t......
-
A.M. v. M.G.M.
...is the best interests and welfare of the children.'"Steed v. Steed, 877 So. 2d 602, 604 (Ala. Civ. App. 2003)."Morrow v. Dillard, 257 So. 3d 316, 324 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017). In T.N.S.R. v. N.P.W., 170 So. 3d 684 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014), the father of a child born out of wedlock agreed to give ......
-
Phillips v. Phillips
...App. 1987). The overall focus of the trial court's decision is the best interests and welfare of the children.’ " Morrow v. Dillard, 257 So. 3d 316, 324 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017) (quoting Steed v. Steed, 877 So. 2d 602, 604 (Ala. Civ. App. 2003) ). The wife asserts that she can provide for the ......
-
A.M. v. M.G.M.
...the best interests and welfare of the children.'"Steed v. Steed, 877 So. 2d 602, 604 (Ala. Civ. App. 2003)."Morrow v. Dillard, 257 So. 3d 316, 324 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017). In T.N.S.R. v. N.P.W., 170 So. 3d 684, 687 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014), the father of a child born out of wedlock agreed to giv......