Morse v. Morse, 79-938

Decision Date20 February 1981
Docket NumberNo. 79-938,79-938
Citation394 So.2d 950
PartiesMajor David P. MORSE v. Roberta Lee MORSE.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Sterling G. Culpepper, Jr. and David R. Boyd of Smith, Bowman, Thagard, Crook & Culpepper, Montgomery, for appellant.

James R. Cooper, Jr. of Cooper & Cooper, Montgomery, for appellee.

SHORES, Justice.

These two parties were married in 1952. They were divorced in Missouri in June, 1969. Both parties were before the Missouri court, which awarded custody of the couple's five children to the wife and ordered the husband to pay monthly payments of $175 per child to support the children and $175 each month as alimony.

In December, 1979, the wife filed a petition in the Missouri court which granted the divorce, asking the court to enter a judgment for the amount of child support and alimony then in arrearage. The Missouri court entered judgment in the amount of $36,216.19. The wife then brought this action in the Montgomery circuit court to enforce the Missouri judgment. The husband answered, saying the Missouri judgment was not entitled to full faith and credit because he had no notice of the proceedings had in Missouri which resulted in a judgment for the amount in arrears. He concedes that Missouri law was complied with; he contends simply that the Missouri judgment is invalid as a matter of law because it was rendered without notice to him.

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the wife, holding that she "has a valid court judgment" and finding that "the Missouri court properly entered judgment against the defendant in that it retained jurisdiction over the parties in matters concerning child support and alimony granted in the divorce decree, and it is the conclusion of this court that full faith and credit is due that judgment...." The court decreed that "judgment be ... entered in favor of the plaintiff." We affirm that decree.

The Constitution of the United States, Article IV, Section 1, requires that "full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records and judicial proceedings of every other state." The judgment of the court of another state having jurisdiction of the subject matter and persons is entitled to full faith and credit in Alabama courts. Hester v. Clinic Masters, Inc., 371 So.2d 915 (Ala.Civ.App.1979), cert. denied, 371 So.2d 917 (Ala.1979). The validity and effect of a foreign judgment, of course, are to be determined by the law of the state in which it was rendered. Forbes v. Davis, 187 Ala. 71, 65 So. 516 (1914).

Under the law of Missouri, support and alimony decrees are enforceable by all remedies available for the enforcement of a judgment, Revised Missouri Statutes, § 452.325.5.

The terms of maintenance and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • E.L. v. V.L. (Ex parte E.L.)
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 18 septembre 2015
    ...law of the state in which it was rendered.’ " Orix Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Murphy, 9 So.3d 1241, 1244 (Ala.2008) (quoting Morse v. Morse, 394 So.2d 950, 951 (Ala.1981) ).III. The gravamen of E.L.'s appeal is that the Jefferson Family Court erred by recognizing and enforcing the Georgia judgmen......
  • Greene v. Connelly
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 6 août 1993
    ...persons is entitled to full faith and credit in Alabama courts. Teng v. Diplomat National Bank, 431 So.2d 1202 (Ala.1983); Morse v. Morse, 394 So.2d 950 (Ala.1981). The validity and effect of a foreign judgment are determined by the law of the state in which it was rendered. Teng, 431 So.2d......
  • Whitney Bank v. Lorant
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 7 février 2014
    ...the state in which [the judgment] was rendered.’ ” Teng v. Diplomat Nat'l Bank, 431 So.2d 1202, 1203 (Ala.1983) (quoting Morse v. Morse, 394 So.2d 950, 951 (Ala.1981) ).Rather than applying Florida law, the trial court used an Alabama procedural rule, namely, Rule 54(b), Ala. R. Civ. P., to......
  • Holiday Casino, Inc. v. Breedwell
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 24 mai 1991
    ...516 (1914)." Wessinger v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Warner Robins, 533 So.2d 234 (Ala.1988), quoting Morse v. Morse, 394 So.2d 950, 951 (Ala.1981). We are aware of the fact that no suit could have been originally brought and maintained on the gambling debt itself in the co......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT