Morse v. United States
Decision Date | 10 June 1958 |
Docket Number | No. 17125.,17125. |
Citation | 256 F.2d 280 |
Parties | James Madison MORSE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
James Madison Morse, in pro. per.
E. Coleman Madsen, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., James L. Guilmartin, U. S. Atty., Edith House, Asst. U. S. Atty., Southern District of Florida, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellee.
Before RIVES, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.
To continue reading
Request your trial12 cases
-
U.S. v. Studley
...not decide whether Studley was in fact subjected to any delay that would constitute a Rule 5(a) violation. Cf. Morse v. United States, 256 F.2d 280 (5th Cir.1958) (per curiam) (delay in taking an accused before a magistrate, though illegal, does not invalidate a conviction absent prejudice ......
-
State v. Caffey
...62 S.Ct. 280, 290, 86 L.Ed. 166. The question, therefore, is whether the long delay deprived Caffey of a fair trial. Morse v. United States, 5 Cir., 256 F.2d 280 (1958); Blood v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 150 F.2d 640 (1945); cf. United States v. Mitchell, 322 U.S. 65, 70, 65 S.Ct. 896, 88 L.Ed. 114......
-
Lovelace v. United States
...Having made no such claim of prejudice, there is no logical reason to overturn the conviction on this ground. See Morse v. United States, 256 F.2d 280 (5th Cir. 1958); United States v. Angelet, 265 F.2d 155, 157 (2d Cir. 1959); cf. United States v. Mitchell, 322 U.S. 65, 64 S.Ct. 896, 88 L.......
-
Diaz v. United States
...though illegal, does not invalidate a conviction in the absence of prejudice resulting from the detention." Morse v. United States, 256 F.2d 280 (5th Cir. 1958). Nor is such a detention the proper subject of collateral attack asserted against a conviction resulting from a trial not infected......
Request a trial to view additional results