Mortimer v. Peterkin
| Decision Date | 23 October 1979 |
| Citation | 407 A.2d 1235,170 N.J.Super. 598 |
| Parties | Marilyn MORTIMER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Frank PETERKIN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant, and Transport of New Jersey, a New Jersey Corporation, Defendant. |
| Court | New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division |
John R. Leith, Newark, for defendant-appellant (Mattson, Madden & Polito, Newark, attorneys).
Leonard J. Felzenberg, Livingston, for plaintiff-respondent (Richard A. Feldman, West Orange, on the brief).
Before Judges FRITZ, KOLE and LANE.
This appeal involves the question reserved in Transport of New Jersey v. Watler, 161 N.J.Super. 453, 391 A.2d 1240 (App.Div.1978), aff'd 79 N.J. 400, 400 A.2d 61 (1979), as to "whether self-insurers are liable to their passengers for injuries caused solely by the negligence of uninsured motorists." (Id. at 465, 391 A.2d at 1246.) In the matter before us plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle owned by Transport of New Jersey (Transport) which collided with a vehicle operated by defendant Peterkin, an uninsured motorist. A jury trying the issue of liability exonerated Transport, finding the uninsured motorist to be solely responsible for the occurrence of the accident. The trial judge entered an order against the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund (UCJF) directing payment of an amount to which plaintiff and Peterkin had stipulated, reserving from the stipulation as to these damages any concession regarding UCJF responsibility. 1
No sound reason has been here forwarded as to why a self-insurer should be relieved of any of the obligations with respect to uninsured motorist coverage which would be imposed upon an insured carrier or other owners of automobiles principally garaged in New Jersey who are obligated to carry uninsured motorist coverage. This is the sense of Watler, supra, and consistent with its sound rationale. There we said, "Self-insurers such as Transport should be expected to cover at least the same risks that other motorists are required by law to cover." (Id. at 463-464, 391 A.2d at 1245.) In its affirmance, the Supreme Court noted without qualification,
* * * The certificate of self-insurance issued to TNJ (Transport) pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6-52 is a "policy" under which TNJ is insured for purposes of N.J.S.A. 39:6-62. Incorporated within this "policy" of self-insurance is the uninsured motorist coverage required of all motor vehicle insurance policies by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. Cf. Comorote v. Massey, 110 N.J.Super. 124, 127-128, 264 A.2d 478 (Law Div.1970) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
American Nurses Ass'n v. Passaic General Hosp.
...Watler, 161 N.J.Super. 453, 391 A.2d 1240 (App.Div.1978), aff'd as modified 79 N.J. 400, 400 A.2d 61 (1979); Mortimer v. Peterkin, 170 N.J.Super. 598, 407 A.2d 1235 (App.Div.1979) (qualified self-insurer pursuant to N.J.S.A. 48:4-12 is required to afford uninsured motorist protection in acc......
-
Ross v. Transport of New Jersey
...an insurance "policy," which subjects it to Title 17 UM requirements. 79 N.J. at 401, 400 A.2d 61; see Mortimer v. Peterkin, 170 N.J.Super. 598, 599-600, 407 A.2d 1235 (App.Div.1979) (self-insured liable for injuries to passenger caused solely by negligence of uninsured motorist); Crocker v......
-
DeMendoza v. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc.
...state agency defendants to provide the equivalent of uninsured motorists protection for their passengers. Mortimer v. Peterkin, 170 N.J.Super. 598, 407 A.2d 1235 (App.Div.1979). The tort action rests on allegations of negligence regarding operation of the bus. The accident occurred December......
-
White v. Howard
...132, 139-142, 553 A.2d 12 (1989); Transport of New Jersey v. Watler, 79 N.J. 400, 401, 400 A.2d 61 (1979); Mortimer v. Peterkin, 170 N.J.Super. 598, 600, 407 A.2d 1235 (App.Div.1979); Crocker v. Transport of New Jersey, 169 N.J.Super. 498, 404 A.2d 1293 (Law Div.1979) (in the context of the......