Moser v. Hampton

Decision Date11 December 1984
Citation298 Or. 171,690 P.2d 505
PartiesJeanne MOSER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Barbara A. Hampton, Deceased, Petitioner on review, v. Clifford HAMPTON, Respondent on review, and Denise Marie Jayne, Defendant. CA A27147; SC S30709.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

Michael A. Greene, Portland, argued cause for petitioner. With him on petition for review was Rosenthal & Greene, P.C., Portland.

Anna J. Brown, Portland, argued cause for respondent on review. With her on response to petition for review were I. Franklin Hunsaker, R.G. Stephenson, and Bullivant, Houser, Bailey, Pendergrass, Hoffman, O'Connell & Goyak, Portland.

Before PETERSON, Chief Justice, and LINDE, CAMPBELL, ROBERTS, CARSON, and JONES, Justices.

Affirmed by an equally divided court.

* Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County. Charles S. Crookham, Judge. 67 Or.App. 716, 679 P.2d 1379 (1984).

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Frye v. Frye
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • September 1, 1985
    ...by a "proverbial thread" the doctrine of interspousal immunity. See Moser v. Hampton, 67 Or.App. 716, 679 P.2d 1379, aff'd mem., 298 Or. 171, 690 P.2d 505 (1984) (by an equally divided Pennsylvania opted for total abrogation of parent-child immunity in Falco v. Pados, 444 Pa. 372, 282 A.2d ......
  • Heino v. Harper
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • August 2, 1988
    ...239 Or. 374, 397 P.2d 771 (1964); see also Moser v. Hampton, 67 Or.App. 716, 679 P.2d 1379, aff'd by an equally divided court 298 Or. 171, 690 P.2d 505 (1984). Upon further consideration, however, we now agree with the overwhelming number of jurisdictions which have concluded that the publi......
  • Draper v. Draper
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • March 24, 1989
    ...Or. 374, 397 P.2d 771, 779 (1964); Moser v. Hampton, 67 Or.App. 716, 679 P.2d 1379, 1381 (1983), aff'd by equally divided court, 298 Or. 171, 690 P.2d 505 (1984); Heino v. Harper, 306 Or. 347, 759 P.2d 253 (1988). Under Oregon law before Heino v. Harper was decided Barbara could not sue Van......
  • Heino v. Harper
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • September 3, 1986
    ...Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Moser v. Hampton, 67 Or.App. 716, 679 P.2d 1379, aff'd 298 Or. 171, 690 P.2d 505 (1984). ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT