Moss v. State

Decision Date19 May 1904
Citation140 Ala. 199,37 So. 156
PartiesMOSS v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Henry County; John P. Hubbard, Judge.

John P. Moss was convicted of failing to work a public road, and he appeals. Dismissed.

The prosecution in this case was against John P. Moss for failure to work a public road after being notified. The judgment entry in the case was in words and figures as follows: "Thereupon came a jury of good and lawful men, to wit, T. O. Mobley, foreman, and eleven others, who, being legally impaneled and sworn according to law, say upon their oaths, 'We, the jury, find the defendant guilty, and assess a fine of one dollar.' And in open court came the defendant, together with A. Q. Armstrong, and confessed judgment for fine and costs, and consent that execution may issue. It is thereupon considered and adjudged by the court that the state of Alabama, for use of Henry county, recover of the defendant and A. Q. Armstrong the said sum of one dollar, the fine so assessed, and all the costs, for which let execution issue." Under the opinion on the present appeal, it is unnecessary to set out the facts of the case in detail.

W. L. Lee, for appellant.

Massey Wilson, Atty. Gen., for the State.

SHARPE, J.

This record discloses no judgment of guilt, but only an entry of what seems to have been intended as a confessed judgment for the fine and costs, following upon a mere verdict of guilt. Upon the authority of Thomason v. State, 70 Ala. 20, which was referred to approvingly in Wright v. State, 103 Ala. 95, 15 So. 506, it must be held that the entry does not constitute a final judgment, such as will support an appeal; and, following the course adopted in Thomason's Case the appeal will be dismissed. Appeal dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Douglas v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • October 8, 1963
    ...before there can be an appeal. Code 1940, T. 15, § 368; Vick v. State, 156 Ala. 669, 46 So. 566 (opinion in So.Rep. only); Moss v. State, 140 Ala. 199, 37 So. 156; Ex parte Loyd, Ala., 155 So.2d The tendencies of the evidence were: William C. Smith, a physician and surgeon of Selma, Alabama......
  • Knight v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 21, 1962
    ...it refers.' The judgment is insufficient. Wright v. State, 103 Ala. 95, 15 So. 506; Marks v. State, 131 Ala. 44, 31 So. 18; Moss v. State, 140 Ala. 199, 37 So. 156; Shepard v. State, 20 Ala.App. 627, 104 So. 674; Blakely v. State, 28 Ala.App. 574, 190 So. For the errors pointed out, the jud......
  • Perry v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • May 16, 1912
    ... ... Ayres v ... State, 71 Ala. 11; Nichols v. State, 100 Ala ... 23, 14 So. 539; Wright v. State, 103 Ala. 95, 15 So ... 506; Campbell v. State, 123 Ala. 72, 26 So. 224; ... Bridges v. State, 124 Ala. 90, 27 So. 474; Marks ... v. State, 131 Ala. 44, 31 So. 18; Moss v ... State, 140 Ala. 199, 37 So. 156 ... Appeal ... ...
  • Miller v. State, 8 Div. 151
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • March 19, 1968
    ...and sentenced. Without a valid judgment of conviction, there can be no appeal. Ex parte Loyd, 275 Ala. 416, 155 So.2d 519; Moss v. State, 140 Ala. 199, 37 So. 156; Perry v. State, 4 Ala.App. 70, 59 So. Motion granted; appeal dismissed. 1 Compare 'bench docket' in Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT