Mothersead v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Decision Date | 28 October 1927 |
Docket Number | No. 7400.,7400. |
Citation | 22 F.2d 644 |
Parties | MOTHERSEAD, State Bank Com'r of Oklahoma, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
M. W. McKenzie and Gentry Lee, both of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellant.
C. B. Ames, of Oklahoma City, Okl. (Joseph A. McCullough, of Baltimore, Md., J. C. Monnet, Jr., of Oklahoma City, Okl., and Ames, Lowe & Cochran, of Oklahoma City, Okl., on the brief), for appellee.
Before BOOTH, Circuit Judge, and TRIEBER1 and PHILLIPS, District Judges.
This is an appeal from a decree in favor of the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (hereinafter called the surety company) in a suit brought by it against O. B. Mothersead, bank commissioner of the state of Oklahoma (hereinafter called the bank commissioner). The suit involves the liquidation of a large number of insolvent banks in the state of Oklahoma. The material facts are not in dispute and are as follows:
The surety company had executed and delivered depository bonds as surety for such banks to secure deposits made therein by the United States, the state of Oklahoma, and certain counties and cities of the state of Oklahoma. When the banks failed, the surety company paid to the respective obligees in the bonds the amounts of their deposits.
In the agreed statement of facts, it was stipulated "that each one of the banks involved in this cause was at the time of its failure insolvent, in that it did not have sufficient property to pay all of its debts, in that the actual cash market value of its assets was insufficient to pay its debts, and in that the aggregate of its property was not at a fair valuation sufficient in amount to pay its debts."
For the purpose of convenience, the banks were classified as classes 1, 2, 3, and 4. Class 1 included banks in which there were deposits of state, county, or city funds secured by the bonds of the surety company. Class 2 included banks in which there were deposits of state, county, or city funds secured in part by the bonds of the surety company and in part by the pledge of securities. Class 3 included banks which the bank commissioner upon examination found to be insolvent, and upon his own initiative took charge of for the purpose of liquidating and winding up their affairs, and in which there were deposits belonging to the United States secured by the bonds of the surety company. Class 4 included banks which voluntarily placed themselves in the hands of the bank commissioner for liquidation, and in which there were deposits belonging to the United States secured by the bonds of the surety company.
The banks falling in class 4 may be divided further into subclasses A and B. The board of directors of each bank, in subclass A, held an informal meeting and, recognizing its insolvency, decided to request, and did request, the bank commissioner to take charge, and thereupon the bank commissioner took charge of each of such banks for the purpose of liquidating its assets and winding up its affairs. The board of directors of each bank, in subclass B, held an informal meeting, and, recognizing its insolvency, decided to place it in the hands of the bank commissioner.
Section 4133, Comp. Okl. St. 1921, in part, provides: "Any bank doing business under this chapter may place its affairs and assets under the control of the bank commissioner by posting a notice on its front door as follows: `This bank is in the hands of the state bank commissioner.'"
Pursuant to such decision of its board of directors and in compliance with the above statute, each of the banks in subclass B closed its doors and caused a notice signed by one of its officers to be posted thereon, which read as follows: "This bank is in the hands of the state bank commissioner." The bank commissioner was then notified of the action taken, and he thereupon took charge of each of such banks for the purpose of liquidating its assets and winding up its affairs.
Upon taking charge of each of the banks falling in classes 3 and 4, the bank commissioner entered an order, which, except as to date, name of assistant bank commissioner and name and location of bank, was substantially as follows:
The decree of the trial court directed the bank commissioner to allow the claims of the surety company, based upon its right of subrogation to the claims of the state and various counties and cities of the state whose deposits were secured by the bonds of the surety company and which were paid by the surety company, and to pay dividends thereon ratably with unsecured depositors.
Counsel for the bank commissioner contend that, under the laws of Oklahoma, the assets of an insolvent bank must be converted into cash and distributed as follows: First, in the payment of the claims of unsecured depositors; and, second, pro rata to the secured depositors and other general creditors, after unsecured depositors are paid in full.
The provisions of the Oklahoma statutes upon which counsel rely are:
Section 4165, Comp. Okl. St. 1921; section 302, R. L. Okl. 1910.
Section 4166, Comp. Okl. St. 1921; section 303 R. L. Okl. 1910.
Section 4167, Comp. Okl. St. 1921; section 304, R. L. Okl. 1910.
* * *"Section 4175, Comp. Okl. St. 1921; Sess. L. 1913, p. 31, § 9.
The...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Anderson v. General American Life Ins. Co.
...the same principle was applied in a bank liquidation under state bank insolvency laws in Mothersead, State Bank Com'r of Oklahoma v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 8 Cir., 22 F.2d 644, 653, 654. See, also, Douglass v. Thurston County, 9 Cir., 86 F.2d 899, 910, 911. Cf. American Sure......
-
People's Bank of Butler v. Allen
... ... 21 R. C. L., sec ... 132, p. 1094; Mothersead v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., ... 22 F.2d 644. (c) Even if the ... as security bonds of the United States or of the State of ... Missouri" to be "deposited ... ...
-
Jones v. Jenkins
... ... banking corporation organized under the laws of the United States; (2) that on February 3, 1922, the Comptroller of ... ...
-
In re South Philadelphia State Bank's Insolvency
... ... The ... opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts ... Exceptions ... dismissed, in ... Surety Co., 288 Pa. 300; Phila ... v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 231 Pa. 208; McSorley v ... Coyle, 40 ... bond of a liquor distiller paid the United States revenue tax ... which his principal had failed to ... Guaranty 347, section 338, note 37; likewise Rex v ... Clarke, 1 ... ...