Mounce v. United States, 15083.

Decision Date11 September 1957
Docket NumberNo. 15083.,15083.
Citation247 F.2d 148
PartiesMervin MOUNCE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

C. C. Rowan, Spokane, Wash., for appellant.

William B. Bantz, U. S. Atty., and William M. Tugman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Spokane, Wash., for appellee.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and POPE and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We are in agreement with Judge Driver's opinion that the standard to be applied in determining whether or not publications are obscene within the meaning of § 1305(a) of Title 19 U.S. C.A. "is the judgment of the average, normal, reasonable, prudent person of the community in which the publication is circulated. If, at the time of such circulation, considered as a whole it offends the sense of propriety, morality, and decency of such average person, it is within the bar of the statute. Otherwise it is not. Guided by these general principles * * * the trier of facts must draw the line as best he can between art and pornography — between what is permissible and what is objectionable and obscene."

We find no error in the trial court's findings of fact, based upon its application of this standard to the facts established by the record in this case. We adopt Judge Driver's opinion as the opinion of the court. United States v. 4200 Copies International Journal, D.C., 134 F.Supp. 490, 493.

The constitutional questions which appellant has raised in this court and which were not discussed in the opinion of the district court have been foreclosed by the decision of the Supreme Court in Roth v. United States, 77 S.Ct. 1304.

The judgment is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • State v. Andrews
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 6 Noviembre 1962
    ...publications containing many nude photographs; Mounce v. United States, 355 U.S. 180, 78 S.Ct. 267, 2 L.Ed.2d 187, vacating 247 F.2d 148 (9th Cir. 1957); (3) a postal order finding 'One--The Homosexual Magazine,' unmailable; One, Inc. v. Olesen, 355 U.S. 371, 78 S.Ct. 364, 2 L.Ed.2d 352, re......
  • Adams v. Hinkle, 34132
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 27 Febrero 1958
    ...meaning of 19 U.S.C.A. § 1305, prohibiting importation of obscene books or pamphlets. The court of appeals affirmed in Mounce v. United States, 9 Cir., 247 F.2d 148. On Monday, December 9, 1957, the United States supreme court on certiorari, Mounce v. United States, 355 U.S. 180, 78 S.Ct. 2......
  • Attorney General v. Book Named 'Tropic of Cancer'
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 17 Julio 1962
    ... ... the intervenor[s] guaranteed * * * by the * * * Constitution of the United States,' under the First Amendment, 'as embraced in the Fourteenth ... by an older woman, and other 'illicit sexual intimacies and acts'); Mounce v. United States, 355 U.S. 180, 78 S.Ct. 267, 2 L.Ed.2d 187 (revg. 247 ... ...
  • State v. Jackson
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 19 Octubre 1960
    ...360 U.S. 684, 79 S.Ct. 1362, 3 L.Ed.2d 1512; Mounce v. United States, 1957, 355 U.S. 180, 78 S.Ct. 267, 2 L.Ed.2d 187, reversing 9 Cir., 1957, 247 F.2d 148. In the past, obscenity has most often been defined by the courts in terms of its 'tendency' to arouse sexual thoughts or to corrupt th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT