Mound Valley Vitrified Brick Co. v. Mound Valley Natural Gas & Oil Co.
Decision Date | 01 May 1911 |
Citation | 258 F. 936 |
Parties | MOUND VALLEY VITRIFIED BRICK CO. v. MOUND VALLEY NATURAL GAS & OIL CO. et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Kansas |
Farrelly & Evans, of Chanute, Kan., and John Madden, of Wichita, Kan for plaintiff.
Jepson & Jepson, of Sioux City, Iowa, and Glasse & Burton, of Parsons, Kan., for defendants.
This action at law was brought by plaintiff against defendants jointly to recover damages for breach of contract to supply plaintiff with natural gas used by it in its work of manufacturing brick. A trial before the court and jury was had, resulting in a verdict in favor of plaintiff against defendants, jointly, for the sum of $15,000. On the return of the verdict, the court, on its own motion, directed the clerk to not enter judgment thereon until certain matters of law might be presented and determined by the court. Separate motions of defendants, raising questions of law on the record, have been filed and presented in oral argument and on briefs of counsel, and now await decision.
The facts necessary to a decision of the pending motions may be briefly stated, as follows: The plaintiff, being about to construct a plant for the purpose of engaging in the manufacture of brick, and being desirous of obtaining in advance a supply of fuel used in such business, on February 13, 1904, entered into the following contract in writing with defendant the Bankers' National Development Company (hereinafter called the 'Development Company'):
'(2) The party of the second part agrees to receive and use gas for the purposes above named, and to use all reasonable means and modern appliances, so as not to waste any gas, and to pay to said first party, its successors and assigns, for said gas used, at the rate of 60 cents per 1,000 brick burned, and to pay for the same on the 15th day of each month after the kilns are emptied; and the party of the first part may shut off the gas if the party of the second part shall fail to pay for the same as herein provided within five days after the same is due and payable.
'(4) It is further agreed to by party of the first part that if they should, at any time after the date of this contract, agree to furnish gas to any other party or parties for manufacturing purposes, and the gas supply should fail so that there would not be a sufficient quantity of gas to supply all so contracted with, and it should cause the supply furnished the party of the second part to be insufficient for the needs of the second party, then the party of the first part are to cease to furnish (for manufacturing purposes only) to party or parties contracted with subsequent to the date of this contract, until sufficient gas has been secured to reinforce the supply until there shall be sufficient gas for all; in other words, the party of the second part are to be furnished gas by the party of the first part in preference to others contracted with after the date of this contract, except as to domestic users.
'(5) It is expressly agreed and understood by and between the parties to this agreement, in case that the party of the first part shall, at any time during the existence of this contract, fail to furnish the said party of the second part sufficient gas for the purposes above named, and in the manner above named, and in the quantities required in this contract for a period of fifteen days, the said second party shall have the right to terminate this contract at any time after such failure, upon written notice deposited in the post office, addressed to the secretary of the party of the first part.
'(6) It is further expressly understood by and agreed to by the parties to this contract, that its terms, conditions, premises and duties to be performed by each and both of the parties hereto, shall be for the term of fifteen years from the date of the execution hereof.
The respective obligations of this contract were fully performed by the parties thereto until May 4, 1904, on which day the Development Company assigned its rights under the contract to defendant the Mound Valley Natural Gas & Oil Company, (hereinafter called the 'Gas Company') by the following assignment in writing:
H. T. Swain, Notary Public.
'My commission expires July 30, 1917.'
Thereafter the Gas Company proceeded with performance of the conditions of the contract obligatory on the part of the Development Company to be performed, and received from plaintiff the consideration expressed in the contract for the performance of such service until the month of December, 1908, when it refused longer to perform said contract. Whereupon this action was brought by plaintiff against both the Development Company and the Gas Company, jointly, to recover damages sustained by reason of such breach.
The question of law on which the court requested advice of counsel on return of the verdict by the jury is this: May the plaintiff in this action, as a matter of law, proceed against both defendants jointly under the terms of the contract and its assignment, and hold both liable for damages sustained by it by reason of the breach? If not, which of defendants is liable to plaintiff for the amount of damages as...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lingle Water Users' Assn. v. Occidental Building & Loan Assn
... ... of the beneficial interest of the Platte Valley Farms ... Company. Second: A pledgee of ... 571, 52 P. 813, 65 Am. St. Rep. 203; Mound ... Valley Brick Co. v. Gas & O. Co., (C. C.) ... ...
-
Hafeman v. Gem Oil Co., s. 34017
...Reynolds, 61 Neb. 758, 86 N.W. 479, 87 Am.St.Rep. 522; Fennell v. Guffey, 139 Pa. 341, 20 A. 1048; Mound Valley Vitrified Brick Co. v. Mound Valley Natural Oil & Gas Co., C.C., 258 F. 936; Annotations, 41 A.L.R. 1370, 79 A.L.R. 499, 102 A.L.R. 784; 3 Summers, Oil and Gas, § 553, p. 297; Tho......
-
Welling v. Crosland
... ... land itself passes." Mound Valley Co. v. Mound ... Valley Co. (C. C.) 258 ... should be sustained, but it is a natural result of the ... appellants' ... [123 S.E ... ...
-
Keller v. California Liquid Gas Corporation
...not to compete have been held to be, by a majority of the courts, of a personal nature. See Mound Valley Vitrified Brick Co. v. Mound Valley Natural Gas & Oil Co., C. C., 258 F. 936; Williams v. Butler, 58 Ind.App. 47, 105 N.E. 387 (1914); Dolan v. Rogers, 149 N.Y. 489, 44 N.E. 167; 3 Page ......