Mountain Springs Ass'n of N. J., Inc. v. Wilson

Decision Date27 December 1963
Docket NumberNo. C--1154,C--1154
Citation196 A.2d 270,81 N.J.Super. 564
PartiesMOUNTAIN SPRINGS ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY, INC., a corporation of the State of New Jersey, Plaintiff, v. Robert R. WILSON et al., Defendants.
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court

Reginald F. Hopkinson, Paterson, for plaintiff. (Hofstra & Hofstra, Paterson, attorneys).

Lawrence T. Isenberg, Pompton Lakes, for defendants Robert R. Wilson, Alfred DiSalvo, Phyllis DiSalvo, Russell Valentine, Katherine Valentine, L. Lewis, R. Dawson, Bernard Dawson and W. D. Livingston (Isenberg & Isenberg, Pompton Lakes, attorneys).

John G. D'Angelo, Butler, for defendant Dagfin Dorph.

DOLLESTER, J.S.C.

Plaintiff Mountain Springs Association of New Jersey, Inc., a nonprofit corporation of this State, brings this action for a construction and determination of the rights and liabilities of the parties under certain covenants and restrictions contained in deeds of property in a 53-acre area known as 'Mountain Springs,' located in West Milford Township.

The area was acquired by Mountain Springs, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, in July 1924 for the purpose of developing a summer residential lake community. A two-acre lake was located in the tract, and Mountain Springs, Inc. laid out on maps, approved by the township and filed with the Register of Deeds for Passaic County, building lots, private roads and areas around the lake for use by property owners.

In order to assure the proper development of the area as a residential community and to provide utilities, including the development and maintenance of roads, of water supply, the upkeep and maintenance of the lake and other facilities for property owners, Mountain Springs, Inc. did two things. It caused to be formed an unincorporated association of property owners, known as Mountain Springs Association, which was to maintain such facilities and, secondly, all deeds to purchasers of lots in the area contained certain covenants, restrictions and reservations.

The granting clause in each deed to a purchaser recited that the grantor sold and conveyed the property 'upon the covenants and with the restrictions and reservations hereinafter set forth.' Following a recital of the description of the property conveyed by the deed were these pertinent provisions:

'1. Except the following covenants and restrictions, all of which shall run with the land, namely:

'a. Neither said premises nor any building now or hereafter placed upon said premises shall be used for any manufacturing or mercantile purpose, or for any business or trade whatsoever, or for stabling of cows or other cattle, or for the housing of fowl.

b. No building shall be erected on the said premises, except one-family private dwellings, and a suitable stable or garage for private use only for each family.

c. No building of any kind shall be erected on the said premises nearer than 10 feet from any boundary line of the premises, except the rear line, nor nearer than 10 feet from any trial, road or pathway. This restriction, however, shall not cover verandas, porches or steps at either front or rear line d. No excavation shall be made on the premises except for the purpose of building thereon, and at the time when building operations are commenced, and no earth or sand shall be removed from the said premises except as part of such excavation.

e. No dwelling or other building shall be erected or occupied on the premises without a cesspool, septic tank and an improved type of chemical toilet, which will meet the requirements of the State Department of Health for the disposal of sewerage from such dwelling. No out-house, toilet or privy shall be erected on the said land, except attached to or as part of the dwelling.

f. The right to run telephone and telegraph lines and poles over, on or under the land hereinbefore described, for the benefit of owners of land at Mountain Springs is reserved by the grantor for itself, its successors and assigns.

g. The right to run water lines or pipes, gas lines or pipes, sewer lines or pipes, in, or under the land hereinbefore described, for the benefit of owners of land at Mountain Springs is reserved by the grantor for itself, it successors and assigns.

h. It is the intent and purpose of this instrument to convey to the grantee, in common with all other purchasers or owners of land at Mountain Springs the use of the lake and stream for boating, bathing, fishing, etc.

i. Whereas, the party of the second part has induced the party of the first part to sell and convey the aforesaid premises, with the promise on the part of the party of the second part to the party of the first part, that the party of the second part will not sell, rent or lease the aforesaid premises or any building thereon, except to a member of the Mountain Springs Association or build or construct or cause to be built or constructed, any building or buildings on the aforesaid premises within a period of three (3) years, without the consent in writing of the party of the first part or its successors and assigns, and the party of the second part has agreed to waive any right or rights which he has or ought to have (a) to sell, rent or lease the said land except as aforesaid, or (b) to build or cause to be constructed thereon any building or buildings, without the consent in writing of the party of the first part or its successors and assigns.

These covenants and restrictions and reservations shall run with the land, but in the event of the Mountain Springs Association disbanding or dissolving or ceasing to be in existence after a period of three (3) years, the party of the second part shall come into his full right or rights without restrictions as to selling, renting or leasing said lands or buildings thereon. Said three-year period to date from July 2nd 1924.'

The Habendum clause of each deed contained a provision that it was 'subject to the covenants, restrictions and reservations hereinbefore set forth.'

The Mountain Springs Association assessed dues against each member which were used to repair roads, provide a central well water system, supervision of the lake, to provide recreation facilities and the like. Dues varies from $10 to $30 per year.

On November 15, 1934 the unincorporated association became incorporated as a corporation not for pecuniary profit under the name of Mountain Springs Association of New Jersey, Inc. (the plaintiff in this action, hereinafter referred to as the Association). On January 15, 1937 Mountain Springs, Inc. conveyed all of its remaining unsold land in the area to plaintiff.

Alma Boyd (named as a defendant in this action but never served with process) purchased several tracts of land in the development from Mountain Springs, Inc. on August 18, 1928. The deed contained the covenants, restrictions and reservations set forth above. On April 13, 1955 Mrs. Boyd and her husband conveyed part of her property to Russell Valentine 'subject to restrictions of record.' Valentine constructed several cabins on the property and resold part of the tract to defendants Robert R. Wilson, Alfred and Phyllis DiSalvo, W. D. Livingston, L. Lewis, R. Dawson and Bernard Dawson (hereinafter referred to as the Valentine group). These defendants have constructed homes on said property and are year-round residents as distinguished from members of the Association, who are only summer residents.

We divert momentarily to get to the nub of the real controversy between the parties. The Valentine group who live in the area all year have their own methods of garbage disposal and have constructed their own wells to provide themselves with water. The summer residents provide a garbage collection service and have established a water distribution system from a main well through water pipes laid on top of the ground. These utilities are paid for by the Association. Such facilities are unavailable to residents except during the summer season.

The Valentine group offered to join the Association provided they were not assessed for garbage collection and water distribution which the Association provided during the summer. The offer was refused. As a result these defendants have refused to join the Association.

It is plaintiff's contention that under the provisions in defendants' deeds they must join the Association and that Alma Boyd violated such provisions when she sold part of her property to Valentine.

1.

Defendants contend that the plaintiff did not succeed to the rights, powers and privileges of the unincorporated Mountain Springs Association. They argue that when the plaintiff corporation was formed on November 15, 1934 the members of the unincorporated association did not comply with the statutory requirements of R.S. 15:1--12, N.J.S.A. pertaining to the incorporation of an unincorporated association. In my view, this contention is without merit since the record indicates that All members of the unincorporated association signed the new certificate of incorporation. In such a case I do not believe that strict compliance with R.S. 15:1--12, N.J.S.A. is required. I am satisfied that the corporation now stands in the shoes of the unincorporated association.

2.

Paragraphs (a) through (e) above quoted are Restrictions on the grantee in the deed which confine buildings erected on the property to one-family houses, require setbacks from roads and side lines, bar excavation except for construction purposes, and require cesspools or septic tanks. Paragraphs (f) and (g) are Reservations in the grantor of easements for telephone and telegraph lines and water and sewer lines.

In paragraph (h) the grantor Conveyed to the grantee A right, in common with other property owners, To use the lake and stream for 'boating, bathing, fishing, etc.' The grant of the right to bathe and boat is a pure Easement; the right to fish is a profit A prendre held as an appurtenance to the land conveyed. Upper Greenwood Lake, etc., Ass'n v. Grozing, 6...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Petersen v. Beekmere, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • 19 Noviembre 1971
    ...payment of an additional fee.) Although the precise facts are not apposite to the present case, Mountain Springs Ass'n of New Jersey v. Wilson, 81 N.J.Super. 564, 196 A.2d 270 (Ch.Div. 1963), sets forth the general rule with regard to vagueness of terms in covenants restrictive of title: It......
  • Matter of Willingboro Country Club, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of New Jersey
    • 21 Enero 1987
    ...177, 208 A.2d 434 (Ch. Div.1965), aff'd. 90 N.J.Super. 401, 217 A.2d 888 (App.Div.1966). See also Mountain Springs Assn. v. Wilson, 81 N.J.Super. 564, 196 A.2d 270 (Ch.Div.1963). In the instant case, the issue has been raised by all counsel as to whether or not the contract is an executory ......
  • Union County Indus. Park v. Union County Park Commission
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • 26 Junio 1967
    ...124 (Ch.Div.1953), affirmed in part, reversed in part 29 N.J.Super. 316, 102 A.2d 686 (App.Div.1954); Mountain Springs Ass'n v. Wilson, 81 N.J.Super. 564, 196 A.2d 270 (Ch.Div.1963). We do not agree. The prime consideration in determining the meaning of deeds is the intent of the parties. N......
  • Syrian Antiochian Orthodox Archdiocese of New York and All North America v. Palisades Associates
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • 13 Abril 1970
    ...is contrary to public policy and hence unenforceable. In support of this contention plaintiff refers to Mountain Springs Ass'n v. Wilson, 81 N.J.Super. 564, 196 A.2d 270 (Ch.Div.1963), and Tuckerton Beach Club v. Bender, 91 N.J.Super. 167, 219 A.2d 529 (App.Div.1966). These cases are not in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • § 31.02 The Various State Laws and Views
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Negotiating and Drafting Commercial Leases CHAPTER 31 Responding to a Tenant's Assignment or Sublease Request
    • Invalid date
    ...1315 (1979)). (Internal citations omitted.)[300] Sommer v. Kridel, N. 294 supra, 378 A.2d at 771.[301] Mountain Springs Assocs. v. Wilson, 196 A.2d 270, 277 (N.J. Super. 1963).[302] Id.[303] Boss Barbara, Inc. v. Newbill, 638 P.2d 1084 (N.M. 1982). Boss Barbara was one of the first cases th......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT