Moye v. Gary, 84 Civ. 2460 (RWS).

Decision Date04 October 1984
Docket NumberNo. 84 Civ. 2460 (RWS).,84 Civ. 2460 (RWS).
Citation595 F. Supp. 738
PartiesDorothy MOYE, Plaintiff, v. Clyde GARY, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

Dorothy E. Moye, plaintiff, pro se.

Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty., S.D. N.Y., New York City, for defendant; Bernard W. Bell, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Dorothy E. Moye ("Moye") commenced this action in New York Civil Court on March 7, 1984, seeking $25,000 for mental anguish. On April 6, 1984, defendant Clyde Gary ("Gary"), an officer of the Department of Health and Human Services, removed the action to this court. Gary has now moved for an order pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissing the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 56. Moye, proceeding pro se submitted no papers in opposition and did not appear for oral argument on August 24, 1984. For the following reasons, the motion is granted and the complaint is dismissed.

The complaint alleges that on February 2, 1984, Gary verbally harassed and insulted Moye in front of her daughter, and on March 5, 1984, Gary called Moye a "fag" and a "poor woman." The facts with respect to the first incident are undisputed. There is, however, a material issue of fact with respect to the second conversation.

On February 28 and March 5, 1984, Moye was a clerical employee in the Disability Inquiry Staff-Disability Program Branch Unit (the "Unit") of the Social Security Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. On February 28, 1984, Gary was Acting Supervisor of the Unit. One of his duties was to make sure that letters concerning social security claims filed by members of the public were properly recorded and distributed to claims examiners. Moye was responsible for recording and distributing such letters to claims examiners.

On February 28, 1984, Gary noticed that written inquiries from members of Congress, State Legislators and other public officials had not been recorded or distributed. When Moye returned from lunch, Gary spoke to her about these letters and informed her that they should be given priority. Moye's daughter and some member of the Unit were in the area and could hear his comments. Gary later apologized for discussing the matter in the presence of Moye's daughter and others.

On March 5, 1984, while Gary was not Acting Supervisor, Gary and Moye had a private conversation. Gary maintains he initiated the conversation to dissipate Moye's apparent animosity toward him. Gary claims he told Moye that someone had started a rumor that he had called her a poor woman but in fact he had never done so. In addition, he claims to have informed her that someone had asked him if Moye were "gay." Gary denies asking Moye if she were "gay" or saying that she was "gay."

Conclusions of Law

The complaint appears to assert a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. In New York, "`one who by extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress to another is subject to liability for such emotional distress.'" Fischer v. Maloney, 43 N.Y.2d 553, 402 N.Y.S.2d 991, 992, 373 N.E.2d 1215, 1217 (1978) (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46). A person is liable for intentional conduct intended to cause emotional distress "only where the conduct has been so outrageous in character and so extreme in degree as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community." Id., 402 N.Y.S.2d at 993, 373 N.E.2d at 1217. The allegedly actionable conduct "must be more than insults, indignities, threats and annoyances," Nestlerode v. Federal Insurance Co., 66 A.D.2d 504, 414 N.Y.S.2d 398 (4th Dep't 1979). The misconduct must be of the most egregious nature. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp., 58 N.Y.2d 293, 461 N.Y.S.2d 232, 236, 448 N.E.2d 86, 90 (1983). As the Restatement (Second) of Torts explains:

Liability clearly does not extend to mere insults, indignities, threats, annoyances, petty oppressions, or other trivialities. The rough edges of our society are still in need of a good deal of
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Sang v. Ming Hai & Law Offices of Ming Hai, P.C.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • June 27, 2013
    ...dismissal of IIED claim where plaintiff alleged she was frequently the subject of derogatory, racist remarks); Moye v. Gary, 595 F.Supp. 738, 739–40 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (dismissing an IIED claim when defendant “verbally harassed and insulted [plaintiff] in front of her daughter, and ... called [......
  • Mariani v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • October 28, 1997
    ...should she file a complaint with the State Division of Human Rights; summary judgment for defendant on IIED claim); Moye v. Gary, 595 F.Supp. 738, 739-40 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (defendant "verbally harassed and insulted [plaintiff] in front of her daughter, and ... called [her] a `fag' and a `poor ......
  • Gallo v. Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane-Societa
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • November 5, 2008
    ...conduct, several New York courts have concluded that imputations of homosexuality are slanderous per se. See, e.g., Moye v. Gary, 595 F.Supp. 738, 740 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (noting that some New York courts include homosexuality); Tourge v. City of Albany, 285 A.D.2d 785, 786, 727 N.Y.S.2d 753 (3d......
  • Bradley v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • March 19, 1987
    ...of decency." Nestlerode v. Federal Ins. Co., 66 A.D.2d 504, 507, 414 N.Y. S.2d 398, 400 (4th Dep't 1979). See also Moye v. Gary, 595 F.Supp. 738, 739 (S.D.N. Y.1984); Greenfield v. Kanwit, 546 F.Supp. 220, 225 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 714 F.2d 113 (2d Cir.1982). The alleged negative evaluations, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Employment discrimination against LGBT persons
    • United States
    • Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law No. XXIV-2, January 2023
    • January 1, 2023
    ...off‌icer did not plead enough facts to survive motion to dismiss for IIED but survived other claims for retaliation). 144. Moye v. Gary, 595 F. Supp. 738, 739 (S.D.N.Y. 1984). 145. Id . at 740. 146. Byra-Grzegorczyk v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 572 F. Supp. 2d 233, 256 (D. Conn. 2008) (quot......
  • Ethical Complexities in Defamation and False Light Claims
    • United States
    • The Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy No. 20-3, July 2022
    • July 1, 2022
    ...that continues to exist the real world). Prior New York cases held that such imputations were actionable defamation. See Moye v. Gary, 595 F. Supp. 738, 740 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (noting that some New York courts include homosexuality); Tourge v. City of Albany, 285 A.D.2d 785, 786 (N.Y. App. Div.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT