Mueller v. Bd. of Com'rs of Marion Cnty.

Decision Date22 April 1920
Docket NumberNo. 10316.,10316.
Citation73 Ind.App. 196,127 N.E. 15
PartiesMUELLER v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF MARION COUNTY.
CourtIndiana Appellate Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Superior Court, Marion County; T. J. Moll, Judge.

Action by Charles H. Mueller against the Board of Commissioners of Marion County. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed with instructions.

L. Russell Newgent, of Indianapolis, for appellant.

Emsley W. Johnson and Joseph W. Hutchinson, both of Indianapolis, for appellee.

NICHOLS, C. J.

Action by appellant, a justice of the peace of Center township, Marion county, Ind., against appellee, to collect certain fees claimed to be due and unpaid, for services rendered by appellant in holding insanity inquests, as required of him by section 3692 et seq., Burns' R. S. 1914. There was a demurrer to the complaint, which was sustained, and, appellant failing to plead further, but electing to stand by his complaint, there was a judgment against him that he take nothing. From this judgment this appeal.

[1] The only error assigned is the court's ruling on the demurrer. Appellee contends that the court has no jurisdiction, for the reason that it does not appear that the claim sued on had first been presented to the board of commissioners and disallowed by the board, as provided in sections 6006, 6007, and 6008, Burns' R. S. 1914. It is true, as contended, that claims against the county must first be presented to the board of commissioners for allowance or disallowance before suits can be filed thereon, but after the action of the board in disallowing the claim, the claimant may at his option appeal, or he may bring an original action (section 6019, R. S. 1914); and it is not necessary to allege in the complaint that these steps have been taken. Bass Foundry, etc., v. Board, 115 Ind. 234, 17 N. E. 593; Board v. Leggett, 115 Ind. 544, 18 N. E. 53;Board v. Brod, 3 Ind. App. 588, 29 N. E. 430;Board v. Austin, 4 Ind. App. 590, 31 N. E. 541.

[2][3] It is next contended by appellee, as appears by its second specification of memorandum with its demurrer, that appellant is entitled to no fees for acting as an examining officer in holding insanity inquests, or in delivering the transcripts to the clerk of the Marion circuit court, for the reason that the statutes of Indiana provide that a justice of the peace in a township like Center township, Marion county, Ind., shall receive a salary of $2,000, which shall be in full of all compensation, fees, or allowances mentioned and set forth in the section providing for fees. It is to be noted that there is no averment in the complaint that indicates whether Center township, Marion county, Ind., has a population that puts it in the class of townships in which the justices of the peace receive a salary compensation of $2,000, but the court will take judicial knowledge that its population so classifies it. Board v. Garty, 161 Ind. 464, 68 N. E. 1012. Sections 3682 et seq., supra, specify the services that are required of justices of the peace in insanity inquests, and then section 3732, R. S. 1914, in force since 1853, provides that justices of the peace shall receive for services, as examining officers, in such proceedings, each, $2 per day, and section 3699, as amended in 1901, provides for a fee of $1 for depositing the papers prepared with the clerk of the circuit court. Each of these fees is payable out of the county treasury. Section 2 of “An act concerning justices of the peace, presenting their number and fixing their compensation,” approved March 15, 1913 (Acts 1913, p. 834; Burns' R. S. 1914, § 1865), provides that “Fees of justices of the peace shall be as follows.” Then follows a list of fees for services, in which list no provision is made for compensation for services in insanity inquests. It is then provided that-

“In any township in the state wherein is located a city having a population of 100,000 or more, no fees named in this section *** shall be charged or collected, but the justices of the peace, and each of them, shall receive, in lieu thereof, a salary at the rate of $2,000 per annum, payable quarterly *** out of the township treasury, which said salary shall be in full of all compensation, fees, or allowances, as mentioned and set forth in this section.”

If appellee's contention is sustained, then the court must hold that all of the justices of the peace of the state, which means those who receive no salary, as well as the very few who do, must perform their services in insanity inquests, paying their own expenses, without compensation. In view of the meager compensation of such officers, especially of those who receive no salary,...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT