Mueller v. Rayon Consultants, Incorporated, 25753.
| Decision Date | 12 November 1959 |
| Docket Number | No. 25753.,25753. |
| Citation | 271 F.2d 591 |
| Parties | Edward O. MUELLER, Plaintiff, v. RAYON CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED, and William R. Schmitz, Defendants. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Spar, Schlem & Burroughs, New York City(Charles Spar and Leon B. Savetsky, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.
Reid & Priest, New York City(Ralph M. McDermid, New York City, of counsel), for defendants.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD, WATERMAN, MOORE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.
Petition for Rehearing en Banc Filed September 10, 1959.
The petition to vacate our order of August 28, 1959, is denied by the court sitting en banc.Upon reconsideration we find that the application for leave to appeal was timely inasmuch as it was made to us within 10 days of the order of the district judge that contained the 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) statement.Because in our judgment the grant of leave to appeal will not fulfill the purpose expressed in the statute, we, in our...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 cases
-
Walters v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.
...of payment under collective bargaining agreement. Cert. denied 359 U. S. 926, 79 S.Ct. 609, 3 L.Ed.2d 628 (1959). 8. Mueller v. Rayon Consultants, Inc., 2 Cir., 271 F.2d 591. Decided November 12, 1959. Involved time in which to appeal from district court decision. No Supreme Court action. 9......
-
United States v. Gori
...York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 2 Cir., 282 F.2d 34; Sperry Rand Corp. v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, 2 Cir., 272 F.2d 29; Mueller v. Rayon Consultants, 2 Cir., 271 F.2d 591; Reardon v. California Tanker Co., 2 Cir., 260 F.2d 369, 375, certiorari denied California Tanker Co. v. Reardon, 359 U.S. ......
-
Hadjipateras v. PACIFICA, SA
...purpose reflected in the statute. Sperry Rand Corp. v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., 2 Cir., 1959, 272 F.2d 29; Mueller v. Rayon Consultants, 2 Cir., 1959, 271 F.2d 591. We need have no apprehensions about its abuse. For unlike many procedural facilities, this is committed wholly to Ju......
-
Al-Jundi v. Estate of Rockefeller
...v. Bullock, 294 F.2d 415 (1961); Sperry Rand Corp. v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., 272 F.2d 29 (1959); Mueller v. Rayon Consultants, Incorporated, 271 F.2d 591 (1959)—and since 1967 generally that the 10-day period for applying to the appellate court for the entertainment of an appeal......
Get Started for Free