Mueller v. Tepler

Citation304 Conn. 909,39 A.3d 1120
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
Decision Date21 March 2012
PartiesMargaret A. MUELLER v. Isidore TEPLER et al.
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Joshua D. Koskoff and Sean K. McElligott, Bridgeport, in support of the petition.

Eric J. Stockman and Simon I. Allentuch, New Haven, in opposition.

The petition by the plaintiff Charlotte Stacey for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn.App. 742, 33 A.3d 814 (2011), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court's grant of the defendants' motion to strike based on grounds distinct from those that the trial court considered when granting the motion?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff Charlotte Stacey was not entitled to loss of consortium damages where she was not married to her domestic partner at the time of the partner's injury because neither civil unions nor same sex marriages were recognized at that time?”

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Zollo v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • March 21, 2012
    ...Conn. 91039 A.3d 1120Bruce ZOLLOv.COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.Supreme Court of Connecticut.Decided March 21, Lori Welch–Rubin, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.Kathryn Ward Bare, assistant state's attorney, in opposition. The petitioner Bruce Zollo's petition for certification fo......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT