Mullaly v. Holden
Decision Date | 16 January 1878 |
Citation | 123 Mass. 583 |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Parties | Martin Mullaly v. George H. Holden & another |
Middlesex. Writ of Error to reverse a judgment rendered by the Superior Court, at March term 1877, affirming a judgment on default of the First District Court of Eastern Middlesex for $ 50 and costs, in an action of contract brought by George H. Holden and Warren Holden against Martin Mullaly. Plea, in nullo est erratum.
The error assigned was that the declaration alleged no legal cause of action. The declaration, as set forth in the record was as follows:
Annexed to the declaration was a copy of the check as follows ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mayor of Cambridge v. Dean
... ... Hickes, 4 Pick ... 497; Dryden v. Dryden, 9 Pick. 546; Tarbell v. Gray, 4 Gray, ... 444; Hollis v. Richardson, 13 Gray, 392; Mullaly v ... Holden, 123 Mass. 583; Farnum v. Aronson, 253 ... Mass. 464 , 466; G.L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 250, Section 4; ... Perkins v. Bangs, 206 Mass. 408 , ... ...
-
Small v. Foley
...it has been held that it is sufficient to allege the agreement generally, without specifically averring that it was in writing. Mullaly v. Holden, 123 Mass. 583; Elting Vanderlyn, 4 Johns. 237; Piercy v. Adams, 22 Ga. 109; Cross v. Everts, 28 Tex. 523. The two classes of cases may not be st......
-
Southwick v. Spevak
...a purpose. [2][3][4] It is not good ground for demurrer that the bill did not aver that the agreements set out were in writing. Mullaly v. Holden, 123 Mass. 583; Cranston v. Smith, 6 R. I. 231. The defense of the statute of frauds, G. L. c. 259, § 1, and chapter 203, § 1, is an affirmative ......
-
Southwick v. Spevak
... ... Mullaly ... v. Holden, 123 Mass. 583. Cranston v. Smith, 6 ... R.I. 231. The defence of the statute of frauds, G.L.c. 259, ... Section 1, and c. 203, ... ...