Mullaney, Wells & Co. v. Savage

Decision Date01 February 1980
Docket NumberNo. 51574,51574
Citation37 Ill.Dec. 572,402 N.E.2d 574,78 Ill.2d 534
Parties, 37 Ill.Dec. 572 MULLANEY, WELLS & COMPANY, Appellant, v. Barnard A. SAVAGE, Jr. et al., Appellees.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

James L. Perkins and John L. Huff, Chicago (Winston & Strawn, Chicago, of counsel), for appellant.

Robert V. Hogan, Chicago (Quinn, Jacobs & Barry, Chicago, of counsel), for appellee Glen Ellyn Corp.

Francis B. Stine, Chicago (Brown, Stine, Cook & Hanson, Chicago, of counsel), for appellee Barnard A. Savage, Jr.

Thomas G. Poulakidas and James A. Sprowl, Chicago (Poulakidas, Poulakidas & Wood, Chicago, of counsel), for appellee-cross-appellant Dorothy F. Williams.

WARD, Justice:

The plaintiff, Mullaney, Wells and Company, filed an action in the circuit court of Cook County on July 3, 1963, against the defendants, Barnard A. Savage, Jr., S. C. Williams, and Glen Ellyn Corporation, seeking an accounting for profits received in connection with the disposition of stock which had been acquired through an alleged violation of fiduciary duties by the defendant Savage, who was an employee of the plaintiff at the time. The case, which was tried on the plaintiff's second amended complaint, filed September 16, 1965, was referred to a master in chancery, who recommended that a decree be entered in favor of the plaintiff. After two interlocutory appeals relating to aspects of the case which are not now pertinent (Mullaney, Wells & Co. v. Savage, 5 Ill.App.3d 1, 282 N.E.2d 536 (1972); 31 Ill.App.3d 343, 334 N.E.2d 795 (1975)), the circuit court sustained the defendants' exceptions to the master's report and entered a decree dismissing the action for want of equity. The appellate court affirmed (66 Ill.App.3d 853, 23 Ill.Dec. 243, 383 N.E.2d 1270), and we granted the plaintiff's petition for leave to appeal.

At the time when the material facts occurred, the plaintiff was engaged in the investment banking business in Chicago. On January 18, 1957, it employed the defendant Savage, and Savage continued in the plaintiff's employment until March 28, 1961, when he resigned.

The agreement under which Savage was engaged was drafted by him and was executed by Savage and Paul L. Mullaney, president of the plaintiff. It provided as follows:

"1. Nature of Agreement--An understanding has been reached whereby Barnard A. Savage, Jr. will become affiliated with Mullaney Wells and Co. to undertake the establishment and direction of an 'industrial financing division.' The function of this newly created division will principally focus on activities involving the origination and negotiation of private placements and the underwriting of corporate securities in the industrial field.

2. Remuneration--Six thousand dollars ($6,000) per annum, payable to Barnard A. Savage, Jr., to be deducted from divisional gross revenues at the conclusion of each calendar year.

3. Division of Net Profits--At the conclusion of each calendar year, total net profits, after deducting all operating expenses accrued by the 'industrial financing division' and after deducting the salary taken by Barnard A. Savage, Jr., will be divided on a 50-50 basis between Mullaney Wells and Co. and Barnard A. Savage, Jr.

4. Duration of Agreement--Both parties concur to appraise this agreement and make such adjustments as the facts and circumstances may warrant at the conclusion of the first year of operations. This agreement is subject to cancellation by either party at any time."

Savage was neither an officer nor a director of the plaintiff, and the precise scope of the duties imposed by his contract is in dispute among the parties.

The transaction on which the present suit is based was the acquisition by Savage and Williams in November 1960, from the majority stockholders of Blossman Hydratane Gas, Inc., a corporation engaged in the liquid petroleum gas business, of options to purchase some of the company's common stock. These options were later assigned to the defendant Glen Ellyn Corporation, a corporation controlled by Savage and Williams. After the options were exercised by Glen Ellyn, the latter assigned the Blossman stock to American Hydratane Corporation, which had been organized by Savage and Williams. It was a subsidiary of Glen Ellyn, and thus was also controlled by Savage and Williams.

Savage first heard of the Blossman company in January 1960, when he was told by a personal friend of his, an investment consultant, that the company was worth looking into because it was in need of financial assistance and its stock was presently undervalued. Savage checked the book value of the company's stock in an investment manual maintained in the plaintiff's office, and by using the plaintiff's teletype service he ascertained the current market value of the stock, which was then being traded at about 33/4 points per share.

Savage then telephoned A. R. Blossman, Sr., the president of Blossman company. Savage testified that he had no recollection of the specific content of this conversation, but he did not recall that the purpose of the call was to induce Blossman to use the plaintiff's services. There is no dispute but that at this point Savage was acting as the agent of the plaintiff. On February 5 Savage wrote a follow-up letter to Blossman on the plaintiff's stationery; it read:

"Dear Mr. Blossman:

I was delighted to have the opportunity to converse with you and become acquainted with you and your rapidly expanding L.P.G. business.

Mullaney, Wells & Company, Inc. of Chicago, Illinois are investment bankers of almost thirty years standing. We are members of the Midwest Stock Exchange and principally engaged in municipal underwriting. In addition, over the years, we have developed a noteworthy group of clients for which we have arranged and negotiated an impressive list of acquisitions, mergers and financings. Our principal bank in Chicago is the City National Bank and Trust Company.

As I indicated to you, we have been requested by a private individual to investigate the investment opportunities in the L.P.G. industry. During the past two years, we have invested funds in excess of two million dollars for his account; recently he has become heir to a sizeable fortune and consequently his investment program must be accelerated. We, as a firm, are willing to vouch for our client's reputation, fairness and integrity.

As indicated, our client is generally not interested in participating in the day to day management affairs of businesses. However, he desires position on the board of directors to help determine policy and long range decisions of the business. Generally, our client seeks a controlling interest with assurances that management will remain; however, in several instances he has been satisfied with a minority position.

If possible at this given moment, could you please send us the following information, so that we may make the necessary recommendations to our client. Should the requested material meet our clients aspirations, we should like to visit you and your organization and become intimately acquainted with you and your operations.

1. A brief outline of the history of your company, including present officers and directors, denoting each director's business interest.

2. A statement as to the Blossman's family's investment in stock and debentures in Blossman Hydratane Gas, Inc.

3. Most recent balance sheet and Profit and Loss statement.

4. A list of fixed assets such as tank ownership etc. Has your company leased any tanks or cylinders to customers? How has your firm financed the tanks and cylinders which they own, etc.

Thanks for the courtesy you extended me on the telephone. I shall be looking forward to hearing from you shortly."

Savage testified that the client referred to in his letter was Howard A. Weiss, who had been engaged in several financial transactions with the plaintiff in which Savage had participated.

The Blossman company had at that time 540,000 shares of common stock outstanding, of which Blossman and three members of his immediate family held 355,758 shares. On February 10, 1960, Blossman wrote the following letter to Savage at the plaintiff's office:

"Dear Mr. Savage:

Your call and interest in our Company was (sic ) greatly appreciated. Under separate cover you will receive a letter from my son answering the questions you asked in your letter of February 5th.

I consider our corporate stock ridiculously under valued on the market. You are aware that our stock is a relatively new security on the market, and it takes time to become known. I would not be interested in anything less than approximately three times the present market value for my stock. I realize that you probably would not have any interest at that price, but hope you will at a later date. Our Company has a great future.

I have a personal proposition you may be interested in, however. Enclosed you will find my personal financial statement. I would like to consolidate my liabilities on one long-term note. As you will note, it would take $300,000.00 to do this. I would be willing and able to pay it off in ten equal payments at an interest rate of 6% on the unpaid balance. The three $100,000.00 notes due from my sons and the 150,000 shares of Blossman Hydratane Gas, Inc. Common Stock securing these notes could be pledged as collateral.

To get this loan, I would give a personal stock option to convert the balance of the loan at any time into our corporate stock at $6.00 per share. The option would start at 50,000 and decrease at 10% per year on the same basis as the unpaid balance. I feel positive that the person or institution that grants me this loan will make some real money on this conversion.

If you have any interest along those lines, please let me hear from you. If not, possibly we can find some grounds for future dealings. I will keep you informed on our Company's progress."

Over the next several months further correspondence...

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • First Fin. Bank, N.A. v. Bauknecht
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of Illinois
    • October 24, 2014
  • Lawlor v. N. Am. Corp.
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • January 28, 2013
    ...496 (2000). Employees as well as officers and directors owe a duty of loyalty to their employer. Mullaney, Wells & Co. v. Savage, 78 Ill.2d 534, 546–47, 37 Ill.Dec. 572, 402 N.E.2d 574 (1980); E.J. McKernan Co. v. Gregory, 252 Ill.App.3d 514, 529, 191 Ill.Dec. 391, 623 N.E.2d 981 (1993). Ac......
  • Advantage Mktg. Grp., Inc. v. Keane
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • May 10, 2019
    ...A duty of loyalty to the employer extends to officers, directors, and employees . Id. (citing Mullaney, Wells & Co. v. Savage , 78 Ill. 2d 534, 546-47, 37 Ill.Dec. 572, 402 N.E.2d 574 (1980) ). "Accordingly, a fiduciary cannot act inconsistently with his agency or trust and cannot solicit h......
  • Riad v. 520 South Michigan Ave. Associates Ltd.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • September 7, 1999
    ...to act solely for the benefit of the principal in all matters connected with his agency. Mullaney, Wells & Co. v. Savage, 78 Ill.2d 534, 546-547, 37 Ill.Dec. 572, 402 N.E.2d 574, 580 (Ill.1980) (citing Restatement (2d) of Agency §§ 387, 393 (1958)). Thus, in some circumstances, one under a ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT