Mullins v. State, 8 Div. 249.

Decision Date23 October 1930
Docket Number8 Div. 249.
Citation222 Ala. 9,130 So. 530
PartiesJAKE MULLINS v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

C. P. Almon, of Florence, and Travis Williams, of Russellville, for petitioner.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of Jake Mullins for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Mullins v. State (8 Div. 147) 130 So. 527.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C.J., and GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Brackin v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • June 30, 1943
    ...deliberations were. Cusimano v. State, Ala.App., 12 So.2d 418; Mullins v. State, 24 Ala.App. 78, 130 So. 527, certiorari denied, 222 Ala. 9, 130 So. 530; Harper State, 16 Ala.App. 153, 75 So. 829; Harris v. State, 241 Ala. 240, 243, 2 So.2d 431, 434; Leith v. State, 206 Ala. 439, 90 So. 687......
  • Hand v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 24, 1984
    ...constitute error. Dill v. State, 5 Ala.App. 162, 59 So. 307 (1912); Mullins v. State, 24 Ala.App. 78, 130 So. 527, cert. denied, 222 Ala. 9, 130 So. 530 (1930); Ballard v. State, 28 Ala.App. 346, 184 So. 259 (1938). "The prejudicial effect of communications between jurors and others, especi......
  • Melvin v. State, 4 Div. 846.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • December 12, 1944
    ...and attempted. Clemons v. State, 17 Ala.App. 533, 86 So. 177; Mullins v. State, 24 Ala.App. 78, 130 So. 527, certiorari denied 222 Ala. 9, 130 So. 530; Rayburn v. Crocker, Ala.App., 19 So.2d Taylor v. State, 18 Ala.App. 466, 93 So. 78. Only one other query remains that merits consideration.......
  • Hall v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 28, 1977
    ...him a bill, or that he was going to find the appellant guilty. Mullins v. State, 24 Ala.App. 78, 130 So. 527 (1930) cert. denied 222 Ala. 9, 130 So. 530 (1930), dealt with a motion for a new trial which involved, as a ground of misconduct, the conversation of one of the jurors with a third ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT