Muni v. INS, 94 CV 2557.
Decision Date | 19 May 1995 |
Docket Number | No. 94 CV 2557.,94 CV 2557. |
Citation | 891 F. Supp. 440 |
Parties | Craig MUNI, Plaintiff, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE and Doris Meissner, Commissioner, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois |
Richard James Puchalski, Sklodowski, Franklin, Puchalski & Reimer, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff.
U.S. Attorney's Office, Chicago, IL, for defendants.
Plaintiff Craig Muni brings this action against the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS or the Service) and its commissioner, Doris Meissner, challenging the Service's denial of his visa petition.1 In June or July 1993 Muni, a player in the National Hockey League (NHL), petitioned the INS for an immigrant visa, claiming that he was a worker with extraordinary ability and therefore deserved priority treatment under § 203(b)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(1)(A).2 The director of the INS' Northern Service Center3 denied his petition, and the Administrative Appeals Unit (AAU) affirmed. Muni now appeals that decision to this court. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Muni's motion is granted and the INS' motion is denied.
Muni was born in Canada on July 19, 1962 and is a Canadian citizen. In 1980, he was drafted by the Toronto Maple Leafs, an NHL team, and he began his career as a defenseman for that team in the 1981-82 season. In October 1986 he was traded to the Edmonton Oilers, where he stayed for seven years. In the 1986-87, 1987-88, and 1989-90 seasons, the Oilers won the Stanley Cup, the NHL's championship trophy. At that time Muni was a regular player and had one of the best plus-minus ratios5 on the team. In the 1988-89 season he had the fourth best plus-minus ratio in the entire NHL. A poll taken by Goal magazine (an NHL publication) rated him the "most underrated defenseman" in the League in 1990, and in 1991 Hockey Digest named him one of the top ten hitting defensemen.
In March 1993 Muni was traded to the Chicago Blackhawks. He now plays for the Buffalo Sabres, whom he joined in October 1993. Muni presently earns $550,000 per year; in the 1992-93 season, when his petition was filed, his annual salary was $400,000. The average salary for an NHL defenseman in 1992-93 was $387,914.
In addition to salary information, Muni submitted to the INS numerous magazine and newspaper articles purporting to establish his stature in the hockey world. He also submitted affidavits from eight veteran NHL players stating that he is highly regarded by other players and is one of the best defensemen in hockey. Finally, Muni alleged that other NHL players of comparable ability — Steve Smith, Rob Brown, and Brent Sutter — have received immigrant visas under § 203(b)(1)(A).
The AAU affirmed. In addition to reiterating the arguments made by the regional director in her initial decision, the AAU found that Muni had not established his role in the Oilers' Stanley Cup victories; that his extended membership in the NHL was not sufficient in itself to establish extraordinary ability; and that he had not presented enough evidence comparing the experience, abilities, and salaries of players who have already received immigrant visas with his own qualifications. The AAU rejected Muni's argument that anyone who plays in the NHL for an extended period of time has extraordinary ability. Instead, because Muni was not "within the small percentage at the very top of the players in the NHL," the AAU concluded that he was not an alien of extraordinary ability and affirmed the director's decision to deny his petition.
Section 203(b)(1) provides in part as follows:
The INS does not contend that Muni has failed to meet the latter two requirements. Therefore, the only issue before this court is whether the INS properly concluded that Muni is not an alien of extraordinary ability under subsection (b)(1)(A)(i).
As an initial matter, we reject Muni's contention that we should treat the definition of extraordinary ability as a question of statutory construction subject to de novo review. It is well established that Inman v. Shalala, 30 F.3d 840, 843 (7th Cir.1994) (quoting Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837, 843, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 2782, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984)) (citations omitted). Section 203(b)(1)(A) does not address the precise question at issue here: how to define extraordinary ability. Therefore, the INS definition of that term is binding unless it is unreasonable.
The INS regulations interpreting § 203(b)(1)(A) define extraordinary ability as "a level of expertise indicating that the individual is one of that small percentage who have risen to the very top of the field of endeavor." 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(2). As further clarification, the regulations explain as follows:
8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3), (4). Under the INS' view, membership on a major league team does not by itself qualify an athlete as one having extraordinary ability, though it may help to establish that the athlete meets several of the criteria listed. In the INS' words, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Krasniqi v. Dibbins
...but its "stature" in the relevant field. Zizi , 2021 WL 2826713, at *6 ; see also Eguchi , 2017 WL 2902667, at *4 ; Muni v. INS , 891 F. Supp. 440, 444 (N.D. Ill. 1995). The AAO's failure to consider the relevant factors renders its decision on this narrow point arbitrary and capricious. se......
-
Mussarova v. Garland
...by submitting salary information of "security guards" to compare with his position as a "security consultant"); Muni v. I.N.S. , 891 F. Supp. 440, 444-45 (N.D. Ill. 1995) (finding the appropriate comparison for evaluating a NHL defenseman's salary was to compare his salary to other NHL defe......
-
Rubin v. Miller
...evidence of other scholars’ citations to the papers, presentations at conferences in the field and news articles); Muni v. I.N.S. , 891 F. Supp. 440, 444-45 (N.D. Ill. 1995) (concluding that defendant's decision denying plaintiff's EB-1 classification petition was arbitrary and capricious, ......
-
Visinscaia v. Beers
...baseball coach for Chicago White Sox). Still, evidence of extraordinary ability is not impossible to come by. See, e.g., Muni v. INS, 891 F.Supp. 440 (N.D.Ill.1995) (finding that agency improperly discounted evidence for NHL hockey player who had won Stanley Cup three times, won “most under......
-
The Curse of Kazarian v. Uscis in Extraordinary Ability Adjudications Under the Employment-based First Preference: Cyrus D. Mehta
...1339 (W.D. Wash. 2011), aff'd, 683 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2012).17.. 772 F. Supp. 2d at 1347.18.. 905 F. Supp. 2d 535 (S.D.N.Y. 2012).19.. 891 F. Supp. 440 (N.D. Ill. 1995).20.. See, e.g., AILA Doc Nos. 12062752, 12062753.21.. 8 CFR §204.5(h)(2).22.. INA §203(b)(1)(A); 8 CFR §204.5(h)(3). See ......
-
Chapter 14 - § 14.4 • HOW DOES USCIS ADJUDICATE EXTRAORDINARY ABILITY PETITIONS?
...Releases 1049-53 (Aug. 24, 1992).[22] Id.[23] See Buletini v. INS, 860 F. Supp. 1222, 1234 (E.D. Mich. 1994); see also Muni v. INS, 891 F. Supp. 440 (N.D. Ill. 1995); Gulen v. Chertoff, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54607 (E.D. Pa. July 16, 2008); Racine v. INS, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4336 (N.D. Ill......