Municipal Waterworks Co. v. City of Ft. Smith

Decision Date30 May 1914
PartiesMUNICIPAL WATERWORKS CO. v. CITY OF FT. SMITH.
CourtU.S. District Court — Western District of Arkansas

Read &amp McDonough, of Ft. Smith, Ark., for plaintiff.

Kimpel & Daily, of Ft. Smith, Ark., for defendant.

YOUMANS District Judge.

This is a suit by plaintiff against defendant for the value of water alleged to have been furnished by the former to the latter from January 1, 1908, to April 5, 1911. It has been submitted to the court sitting as a jury. The subject-matter grows out of a suit begun prior to January 1, 1908, and terminated in April, 1911, which the city of Ft. Smith instituted against the plaintiff to enforce an option to purchase the plant reserved in the franchise granted by ordinance to plaintiff's predecessor, March 31, 1884, being Ordinance No. 35. That ordinance, with amendments thereto, appears in Read & McDonough's Digest of the Ordinances of the City of Ft. Smith as sections 1069 to 1103, both inclusive. Section 1085 is as follows:

'Sec 1085. Right to Purchase.-- The city shall have the right to purchase said waterworks and appurtenances at the expiration of ten years from January 1, 1885, and at the expiration of every five years thereafter, at their fair and equitable value of the works, lands, buildings, machinery and equipments; such value, in case the parties can not agree, to be determined by arbitration, as provided by the state, or if that method is not satisfactory, by the circuit court of Sebastian county for the Fort Smith district, as other questions of fact-- any delays in such proceedings not to forfeit the right of the city to make such purchase, and any incumbrance upon said works and property shall be subject to the right of the city to purchase the same as herein provided.'

On February 22, 1887, the city council of the city of Ft. Smith passed a resolution which appears in the Digest as section 1092, as follows:

'Sec. 1092. Extension of Contract and Right of Purchase-- Whereas, the Fort Smith Waterworks purpose, as set forth by their letter addressed to the mayor and city council of February 2, 1887, to increase the efficiency of their works by putting up, at great expense, new machinery, with the capacity to insure a sufficient supply of water for all purposes, as required by the terms of Ordinance No. 35(a), not only for the wants of the present inhabitants, but sufficient to keep pace with the wants of our rapidly increasing population. Therefore, be it resolved, that in consideration of said additions and improvements the city hereby waives the right of purchasing said waterworks, as provided for in section 9 of said Ordinance 35, for the full term of twenty years, from and after the completion of said addition and improvements, as indicated in the letter above referred to; provided, that the said improvements shall be commenced at once and shall be completed on or before the first day of October, A.D. 1887, or sooner if practicable, unless prevented by high water. Resolution February 22, 1887.' Section 7 of the original ordinance appears in the Digest as section 1081, and is as follows:
'Sec. 1081. Hydrants, Number and Kind.-- There shall be located at such places (on the lines of mains as laid by said grantees), as the city council may approve, not less than fifty double-tipped, brass-mounted, anti-freezing fire hydrants, with two and one-half inch nozzles for fire hose; said hydrants to be furnished, erected and kept in repair by said grantees, and for the use of each and every of which fire hydrants, from and after the completion of said waterworks and tests as herein provided, during the continuance of this franchise, said city hereby agrees to pay the said grantees, or their assigns, the sum of sixty dollars per annum. The said grantees shall furnish and erect additional hydrants when so ordered by the city council, for the use of each and every additional hydrant, from and after the time when they are ready to supply water, notice thereof to be given in writing to the city recorder, the city hereby agrees, during the continuance of this franchise, to pay the sum of fifty dollars per annum; all hydrant rental to be paid semiannually on the 15th day of January and July of each year.'

Part of section 9 of the original ordinance appears in the Digest as section 1087, and is as follows:

'Sec. 1087. Right to Maintain and Operate the Same.-- At the expiration of this franchise, if the city is not the owner of said waterworks, the grantees shall continue to have the right to maintain and operate the same, the city having the right to continue the use of the fire hydrants upon such terms as may be then agreed upon, or, if the parties do not agree, then at the minimum rates for water actually used.'

In section 1088, being part of the original ordinance fixing annual water rates, appears the following: 'City offices and prisons included in hydrant rent.'

In January, 1891, a supplementary contract was entered into by plaintiff and defendant, which appears as section 1093 of the Digest, and is as follows:

'Sec. 1093. Supplemental Contract-- Standpipe-- Hydrants and Other Conditions.-- The board of public affairs of the city of Forth Smith be and is hereby authorized to enter into a contract with the Fort Smith Water Company to settle existing difficulties between said city and company, in the following terms: Contract between the city of Forth Smith and the Fort Smith Water Company. It is hereby agreed by and between the city of Fort Smith, Arkansas, party of the first part, and the Fort Smith Water Company, party of the second part, that the party of the second part shall put in its plant for said city, a new set of pumps with a capacity of not less than two and a half million gallons per day; shall erect a stand pipe or water tower, at or near its present reservoir; shall put a filter in said plant; shall put in a twelve-inch supply main from the reservoir along Lexington avenue to Little Rock avenue; thence along Little Rock avenue to Thirteenth street; thence along Thirteenth street to North C street; thence along North C street to North Fourth street; a ten-inch main from South D. street along Wheeler avenue to Carnall avenue; thence across Carnall avenue to and along Garland avenue to South Sixth street; thence along South Sixth street to Parker avenue; thence along Parker avenue to South Fourth street; an eight-inch main along South Fourth street from Parker avenue to North C street; along South B street from Lexington avenue to Little Rock avenue; thence along Little Rock avenue to Eighteenth street, and thence along Eighteenth street to North F street; a six-inch main along North E street from Lexington avenue to South Eighteenth street; thence along South Eighteenth street to Little Rock avenue; on North Thirteenth street from North C street to North J street; thence on North J street to North Twelfth street; thence on North Twelfth street to North I street; on North Tenth street from North C street to North L street, and from South Fourth on Rogers avenue to Towson avenue; a sixteen-inch main from the present terminus of the force main near the pumphouse to the reservoir or stand pipe, independent of the present distribution pipes running to the reservoir and to the city. The city shall, at the time of laying the above mains, designate the places where city hydrants will be placed when they shall be ordered, so that the water company can put in specials to which said hydrants can afterwards be attached. Said work is to be begun immediately and be completed by September 1, next, any delays by injunction or order of any court, unavoidable accidents or delays from malicious interference, excepted. All dead ends to be connected wherever practicable. When the above work is completed, the party of the first part will dismiss the action now pending between the parties hereto in the Sebastian county circuit court for the Fort Smith district of Sebastian county, Arkansas, until which time said action shall stand continued. In consideration of the performance by the parties hereto of the foregoing agreement, it is further agreed that the said city may have sufficient water without charge to fill properly constructed sewer flush tanks to flush the sewers of said city. The water to be taken from the mains of said water company at points convenient and least expensive to the city. All connections for this purpose to be made under the direction of the water company (as other connections are made) but at the expense of the city. Such flushing shall be done twice in twenty-four hours, and oftener during the prevalence of epidemics, upon the order of the board of health of said city. In addition to the above specified mains to be put in by said company on or before September 1st, next, upon which the city is not compelled to take hydrants until it shall see fit, said water company shall furnish one hundred hydrants, similar to those already in use, on mains to be laid in such streets as the city shall hereafter designate, for which the city shall pay a yearly rental of only thirty dollars per hydrant, payable as the other hydrant rentals, said hydrants to be supplied as follows: The first twenty-five by January 1, 1892; the second twenty-five by January 1, 1893; the third twenty-five by January 1, 1894; and the remainder by January 1, 1895. The city reserves the right to locate said hydrants seven hundred and twenty feet apart, and if any two be placed nearer together than seven hundred and twenty feet, others may be placed enough more than seven hundred and twenty feet apart to maintain the average distance of seven hundred and twenty feet. This agreement shall continue and be in force during the existence of the franchise and
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Brunner v. Stix, Baer & Fuller Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 5, 1944
    ... ...          Appeal ... from Circuit Court of City of St. Louis; Hon. Joseph J ... Ward , Judge ...           ... Store Service Co. v. Weil, 8 N.Y.S. 336; Municipal ... Water Works Co. v. City of Fort Smith, 216 F. 431; ... Haskins v ... ...
  • Consolidated Products Co. v. Blue Valley Creamery Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • May 25, 1938
    ...supra, relied upon by the New York court in Lonsdale v. J. A. Migel, Inc., supra, and quoted by this court in Municipal Waterworks Co. v. City of Fort Smith, D.C., 216 F. 431, and Lueddecke v. Chevrolet Motor Co., 8 Cir., 70 F. 2d 345. See, generally, Mariash on Sales, 62, § 42; Woodward, Q......
  • Norfolk Southern Bus Corp. v. Virginia Dare Transp. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • January 7, 1947
    ...of an express agreement that they shall be performed without charge if certain conditions are met. See Municipal Waterworks Co. v. City of Ft. Smith, D.C.W.D.Ark., 216 F. 431, 438; Lueddecke v. Chevrolet Motor Co., 8 Cir., 70 F.2d 345, 348; Sickelco v. Union Pacific R. Co., 9 Cir., 111 F.2d......
  • Lueddecke v. Chevrolet Motor Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • March 16, 1934
    ...ideas. The law will not imply a promise on the part of any person against his own express declaration. Municipal Waterworks Co. v. City of Ft. Smith (D. C.) 216 F. 431; Landon v. Kansas City Gas Co., 300 F. 351 (D. C.); Boston Ice Co. v. Potter, 123 Mass. 28, 25 Am. Rep. 9; Earle v. Coburn,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT