Munn v. Hotchkiss Sch.
Decision Date | 05 June 2014 |
Docket Number | No. 3:09–cv–919 SRU.,3:09–cv–919 SRU. |
Citation | 24 F.Supp.3d 155 |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Connecticut |
Parties | Cara MUNN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The HOTCHKISS SCHOOL, Defendant. |
Alinor Clemans Sterling, Bridgeport, CT, Antonio Ponvert, III, Michael P. Koskoff, William M. Bloss, Koskoff, Koskoff & Bieder, P.C., Bridgeport, CT, for Plaintiffs.
Aaron S. Bayer, Carolina D. Ventura, Jeffrey R. Babbin, Jessica Bruno Vetter, Penny Q. Seaman, Wiggin & Dana, New Haven, CT, Daniel J. Krisch, Karen L. Dowd, Kenneth James Bartschi, Halloran & Sage, LLP, Hartford, CT, Michael T. McGinley, Wiggin & Dana LLP, Stamford, CT, Wesley W. Horton, Horton, Shields & Knox, Hartford, CT, for Defendant.
RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL, RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, AND MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT
In July 2007, Cara Munn contracted tick-borne encephalitis (“TBE”) while on a trip to China sponsored by her boarding school, The Hotchkiss School (“Hotchkiss”).TBE attacks the central nervous system, causing swelling in the brain and spinal cord.In severe cases, the inflammation results in permanent brain damage.Munn suffered that fate: She has lost the ability to speak; she has little control over her facial muscles, so that she always appears to be smiling and often drools uncontrollably; and she has cognitive deficits that slow her ability to think through complex problems.
Munn and her parents, Orson and Christine Munn(collectively “the Munns”), filed this lawsuit alleging that Hotchkiss's negligent planning of the trip and careless supervision during the trip caused Cara to fall ill.On March 27, 2013, after seven days of evidence including testimony from the Munns, school personnel, and almost a dozen experts, the jury found Hotchkiss solely liable for Munn's injuries.It awarded the Munns $10.25 million in past and future economic damages, and $31.5 million in non-economic damages.
Hotchkiss now challenges that verdict and award, moving for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(b)(doc. 206), or, in the alternative, for a new trial under Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure(doc. 207).The school asserts five claims in support of its motions: (1) Munn's infection was unforeseeable; (2) Munn failed to prove that she was infected with TBE in a specific location; (3)the court mismanaged expert testimony; (4) Mr. and Mrs. Munns' negligence contributed to Munn's injury; and (5) a $41.75 million verdict is excessive.Hotchkiss additionally moves to alter judgment (doc. 209).For the reasons set forth, the combined motions are denied, and the motion to alter judgment is denied as moot in light of the parties' joint stipulation regarding collateral source reduction (doc. 251).
Munn entered Hotchkiss as a fourteen-year-old freshman in the fall of 2006. TrialTr. 988:12.During the winter of her first year, Munn learned of Hotchkiss's international programs, and, after discussion with her mother, she signed-up for Hotchkiss's summer school in Tianjin, China.TrialTr. 912:9–18.The China program immersed students in Chinese language and culture; for one month, participants attended intensive language classes at a high school during the week and visited cultural landmarks on the weekends.Pls.'TrialEx. 11.
During the spring semester, Jean Yu, the director of Hotchkiss's Chinese Language and Culture Program and the trip leader, and David Thompson, the director of Hotchkiss's International Programs, provided students and parents with information about the trip.In early March 2007, Yu sent an email with two attachments: a packet that outlined the trip's activities and a set of legal forms that asked participants and parents to waive legal claims against the school.Def.'s TrialExs. 507, 616.The packet mentioned that the students would visit “Mount Pan”1 as part of a Tianjin city tour.Def.'s Trial Ex. 506, at 2;Def.'s Trial Ex. 507, at 4.Parents were instructed to sign and return the waiver.Def.'s Trial Ex. 616, at 1.Christine Munn, Munn's mother, and Munn both signed the waiver.Pls.'Mot. in Limine, Ex. C(doc. 143).
In April 2007, Yu followed up with another email with medical advice for trip participants.Pls.'TrialEx. 2.It included a link to a U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) webpage and instructed parents that the Hotchkiss infirmary could “serve as a travel clinic.”Id.But the advice was inaccurate; the web address linked to a webpage on Central America, not China, and the school infirmary was only available to administer vaccines prescribed by an outside doctor and could not give students independent advice on medical risks abroad.TrialTr. 79:4–19, 209:14–16, 220:4–7.According to Thompson, the school expected students to know about the school clinic's limitations and to “go to a travel medicine specialist or a travel clinic at home ... when the students would have two, two and-a-half weeks [of spring break].”TrialTr. 237:1–9.
Yu also sent recipients a complete itinerary, a packing list, and a handbook on international travel.Pls.'TrialEx. 2.The itinerary again listed “Mount Pan” as part of a city tour.Pls.'TrialEx. 10.The packing list mentioned bug spray under the category “Miscellaneous,” just above the item “musical instrument.”Pls.' TrialEx. 2.The travel handbook contained no warnings about insect-borne disease, though it devoted pages to other health risks, including a reminder to be wary of foreign blood banks in the event a student required surgery abroad and advice to bring American condoms to China to avoid using faulty protection and contracting a serious sexually-transmitted disease.Pls.'TrialEx. 1.
Thus, as Munn headed to China, neither she nor her parents had notice that she would visit a non-urban, forested area that might contain ticks or other insects carrying disease.Nor had Munn or her parents received any warnings about how to prevent insect-borne disease during the trip.The first few weeks of Munn's trip proceeded without incident: she attended classes, visited sites, and made new friends.Yu testified that the students were all healthy during that time and that she only heard complaints about bug bites once, when the children visited Nanking University at dusk.TrialTr. 569:11–570:8.
On June 23, 2007, the students left for a weekend excursion about sixty miles from Tianjin's city center.The students visited the Great Wall in the early morning, and they arrived at Mount Panshan in the late morning or very early afternoon.TrialTr. 594:11–22.According to video and pictures admitted at trial, Mount Panshan is a forested peak that sits next to several other smaller foothills.Pls.'TrialExs. 20, 405;Def.'s TrialEx. 614.It is surrounded by what Americans might call an exurban landscape—a traditionally rural community with growing housing density created by commuters to the cities.TrialTr. 512:12–18, 551:14–17.
No one had warned students that they should dress for a serious hike—all walked up the mountain in shorts and t-shirts or tank tops, and some even wore sandals instead of sneakers.Def.'s TrialEx. 614.No one warned students to apply bug spray before they trekked up the mountain.Indeed, Yu left her bug spray on the bus.TrialTr. 540:15–24.At the beginning of the hike, a guide led students up a paved pathway to a set of temples at the top of the mountain.TrialTr. 592:6–10.At the top of the mountain the group split-up: Teachers, chaperones, and the majority of students rode a cable car down the mountain.TrialTr. 519:1–522:25, 538:1–540:25.Munn and two or three other students, however, asked to walk down the mountain by themselves.Id.Yu pointed them towards the path and said she would wait for them at the bottom.Id.
According to Munn's uncontroverted testimony, the students decided to leave the paved path and venture down Mount Panshan on narrow dirt trails that connected other temples on the mountain.TrialTr. 526:1–533:25, 1007:22–1008:15.Munn recounted that the hikers quickly became lost and ended up walking among trees and through brush before eventually finding the path and reconnecting with the others.TrialTr. 1029:7–25.The students then visited another forested area of Mount Panshan, one reached by a dirt path.Pls.'TrialEx. 20;TrialTr. 1029:1–1030:25.
After the trip to Mount Panshan, Munn recalled having many insect bites and a welt on her arm.TrialTr. 1008:14–22, 1034:17–1035:13.Other than itchy discomfort, though, she felt fine.TrialTr. 1034:17–1035:7, 1036:8–10.Ten days later she awoke with flu-like symptoms—a headache, a fever, and wooziness.Pls.'
TrialEx. 36–2;TrialTr. 693:6–16.Munn then grew more disoriented, and Yu decided to take her to the local hospital.
From that point, Munn's condition deteriorated rapidly.Pls.'TrialEx. 36–2, 36–3.The local hospital transferred her to a Beijing hospital, and her parents arrived from the United States.TrialTr. 694:1–11, 915:19–916:16;Pls.' Trial Ex. 36–2, at 29;Pls.' Trial Ex. 36–3, at 4–5, 7.They found her severely ill. TrialTr. 915:22–916:14;Pls.' Trial Ex. 36–3, at 23.She was partially paralyzed.Pls.'Trial Ex. 36–3, at 23, 25;TrialTr. 694:5–6; 918:10–919:2.She could not speak.Pls.'Trial Ex. 36–3, at 23, 25;TrialTr. 694:15–20.She dipped into a semi-comatose state.Pls.'Trial Ex. 36–3, at 25;TrialTr. 918:15–25.Once it became clear that Munn's condition would not improve quickly, her father arranged for her to be airlifted to New York, where she was admitted to New York Presbyterian Hospital.TrialTr. 919:3–8, 990:22–991:15;Pls.' Trial Ex. 36–5, at 1.
After a week at New York Presbyterian and a month at a rehabilitation center, Munn's condition stabilized and improved, but she was left permanently disabled.She never regained the ability to speak.TrialTr. 800:7–11.Indeed, her vocal cords are so taut that she can at best make soft, single-syllable sounds, and like...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Better Holdco, Inc. v. Beeline Loans, Inc.
...gap between known facts and [the expert]'s assertions is enormous"), aff'd, 773 F. App'x 607 (Fed. Cir. 2019); Munn v. Hotchkiss Sch., 24 F. Supp. 3d 155, 202 (D. Conn. 2014) (observing that testimony may "be excluded or stricken if the expert unjustifiably extrapolates from an accepted pre......
-
14.21 - K. Lack Of Reliable Factual Foundation
...1017 (E.D. Wash. 2010).[2592] . 639 F.3d 11, 22–23 (1st Cir. 2011). [2593] . 761 F. Supp. 2d 1007, 1021–22 (E.D. Cal. 2011).[2594] . 24 F. Supp. 3d 155, 207 (D. Conn. 2014).[2595] . 68 F. Supp. 3d 983, 991 (N.D. Iowa 2014). [2596] . 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139366, *34–35 (E.D. Va. Sept. 30,...