Murdock v. Murdock
| Decision Date | 04 December 1906 |
| Citation | Murdock v. Murdock, 74 N. H. 77, 65 A. 392 (N.H. 1906) |
| Parties | MURDOCK v. MURDOCK et al. |
| Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Transferred from Superior Court; Chamberlain, Judge.
Petition by Frederick W. Murdock, guardian of Carrie L. Murdock, against John C. Murdock and others, for partition. Trial by the court and decree for plaintiff. Transferred from the superior court on exception by defendant John C. Murdock. Exception overruled.
Lydia A. Murdock died seised of the premises of which partition is sought. The only persons interested in the property are John C. Murdock, the decedent's husband, and Lena C. Yeaton, her daughter by a former marriage, who are the defendants, and Carrie L. Murdock, the plaintiff's ward and an adopted daughter of John and Lydia, who had no issue. John claimed an estate by the curtesy, and for that reason excepted to the denial of his motion to dismiss the petition.
Edwin B. Weston, for plaintiff. John G. Crawford, for defendants.
If the language of section 9, chapter 195, Pub. St 1901, is given its ordinary meaning—and there is nothing to show that the Legislature intended to give it any other meaning—John is not entitled to an estate by the curtesy. Foster v. Marshall, 22 N. H. 491. Although the fact that their adopted child takes more and he less than if she...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
In re Book's Will
...relation of parents and children, be deemed the child of the parents by adoption. It reaffirmed its determination in Murdock v. Murdock, 74 N. H. 77, 65 Atl. 392, that the statutory adoption of a child did not invest the husband with the common-law right of curtesy. It distinguished Moran v......
- Thompson v. Kidder
-
Morse v. Osborne
...of a child was not intended to invest the husband with the common-law right of curtesy. It was so held in a recent case. Murdoch v. Murdock, 74 N. H. 77, 65 Atl. 392. In 1862 the widow's share in her husband's estate, in addition to homestead and dower, depended in part upon whether or not ......
-
Clark v. Clark
...adoption of a child is not an equivalent for the birth of issue in determining the rights of a surviving husband or wife. Murdock v. Murdock, 74 N. H. 77, 65 Atl. 392; Morse v. Osborne, 75 N. H. 487, 77 Atl. 403, 30 L. R. A. (N. S.) 914, Ann. Cas. 1912A, 324. But these cases are not determi......