Murphy v. Bryant
| Decision Date | 05 October 2009 |
| Docket Number | No. 09–84.,09–84. |
| Citation | 130 S.Ct. 259,78 USLW 3059,78 USLW 3182,78 USLW 3151,558 U.S. 938,175 L.Ed.2d 242 |
| Parties | Brian K. MURPHY, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, petitioner, v. Bernale BRYANT. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Case below, 290 Conn. 502, 964 A.2d 1186.
Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted.Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 cases
-
Love v. Comm'r of Corr.
...trial counsel’s strategy concerning these decisions is sound" (citation omitted)), cert. denied sub nom. Murphy v. Bryant, 558 U.S. 938, 130 S. Ct. 259, 175 L. Ed. 2d 242 (2009). [7, 8] As this court observed in Brown, "[f]ailing to retain or utilize an expert witness is not deficient when ......
-
Godfrey-Hill v. Comm'r of Corr.
...to investigate and to call Anita Morales as a witness at the petitioner's criminal trial. 4 A trial was held before the habeas court, M . Murphy, J ., on April 21, 2022, during which the petitioner was represented by Attorney Robert L. O'Brien. Conway, the petitioner, and Morales each testi......