Murphy v. Labor Source, LLC
Decision Date | 08 February 2022 |
Docket Number | 19-cv-1929 (ECW) |
Parties | MARCQUISE MURPHY and RATANYA ROGERS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. LABOR SOURCE, LLC d/b/a CATSTAFF d/b/a ONE SOURCE STAFFING AND LABOR, and BLUSKY RESTORATION CONTRACTORS, LLC, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota |
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Certification and Court-Authorized Notice Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (Dkt. 132); Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike or Void Defendants' Rule 68 Offer (Dkt. 152); and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Claims of Plaintiff Ratanya Rogers (Dkt. 158). The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
On July 23, 2019, Plaintiffs Marcquise Murphy (“Murphy”) and Ratanya Rogers (“Rogers”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) initiated this putative collective and class action on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated individuals who have worked for Defendants Labor Source, LLC doing business as One Source Staffing and Labor (“Labor Source” or “One Source”) and BluSky Restoration Contractors, LLC (“BluSky”) (collectively, “Defendants”) as non-exempt manual laborers. (Dkt. 1 ¶ 1.) Plaintiffs and the putative class and collective members “challenge[d] Defendants' minimum wage and overtime violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq. (‘FLSA'), as well as the wage, hour, labor, and other applicable laws of the State[ ] of Minnesota, including the Minnesota Fair Labor Standards Act, Minn. Stat. § 177.21 et seq. (‘MFLSA') and the Minnesota Payment of Wages Act, Minn. Stat. § 181.01 et seq. (‘MPWA').” (Id.)
“BluSky provides commercial, industrial, governmental, residential, and multifamily restoration, renovation, environmental, and roofing services across the United States....” (Dkt. 136-1 at 1.)
Labor Source hires employees to serve as unskilled and semi-skilled temporary laborers, most commonly in the construction, manufacturing, restoration, and disaster recovery industries. (Dkt. 170 ¶ 3.) Labor Source provides temporary labor across the country, and contracts with its clients to provide temporary labor on a project-by-project basis. (Dkt. 170 ¶¶ 2-3.) By way of example, on or about September 25, 2013, One Source and BluSky (as the customer) entered into a rate agreement (“Rate Agreement”) setting the billing rate for the workers supplied by One Source, which included the rates for general labor, leads, vans, worker per diem (including for hotels), worker travel time, and worker stand down time. (Dkt. 136-3.) In addition, the Rate Agreement provided as follows:
As a temporary staffing company, the main source of Labor Source's revenue is the rate paid by its clients for each hour worked by Labor Source employees. (Dkt. 170 ¶ 50.)
Murphy asserts in his Declaration as follows: that he was employed by One Source and BluSky Restoration as a manual laborer and non-commercial driver from approximately August 2017 through January 2018 for the Weyerhaeuser remediation project in Minnesota (“Weyerhaeuser Project”). (Dkt. 137-8 ¶ 2.) Labor Source asserts that Murphy was hired on August 28, 2017, and started working on the Weyerhaeuser Project on August 29, 2017. According to Labor Source's records, Murphy's final day of work was September 2, 2017, and he has not worked for Labor Source since that date. (Dkt. 170 ¶ 51.) Murphy was classified as non-exempt and was paid on an hourly-rate basis at $10 per hour. (Dkt. 137-8 ¶ 3.) Murphy worked, on average, approximately 1516 hours per day on the Weyerhaeuser Project. (Id. ¶ 4.) At a minimum, he worked 12 hours per day and at most he worked upwards of 18-19 hours per day. (Id.) He and others worked six-to-seven days per week until the project was finished. (Id.) Murphy worked more than 40 hours per week virtually every week, sometimes upwards of 80-90 hours per week. (Id.)
Murphy claimed that his primary job duties included providing manual labor services, remediation work, driving/transporting crew members to and from the worksite, and logging/stocking materials. (Id. ¶ 5.)
With respect to timekeeping, Murphy claims as follows: BluSky had a daily timekeeping system that consisted of paper timesheets. (Id. ¶ 6.) BluSky, through their project manager and/or team leads over the Weyerhaeuser Project, would uniformly fill out the time sheets for the workers before the workers even saw the timesheets, stating the workers arrived at a certain time and stopped working at a certain time. (Id.) BluSky would then require the workers to sign their name to the daily time sheet, even though the times were not accurate. (Id.) BluSky's team leads threatened to withhold pay unless workers signed their names to the inaccurate daily time sheets. (Id.) By way of example, Murphy asserts that during the Weyerhaeuser Project, laborers would regularly work upwards of 15-16 hours per day, however, BluSky would only show that the laborers worked approximately 11 or 12 hours per day and also inaccurately reflected that laborers received fully off-duty meal breaks, which also resulted in him losing dozens of hours' worth of compensable work time and hundreds of dollars in overtime wages every week. (Id. ¶ 7.) BluSky's project manager would then submit those fabricated and inaccurate time sheets to One Source, so that One Source could pay the workers for the...
To continue reading
Request your trial