Murray v. City of New York

Decision Date31 October 1978
Citation45 N.Y.2d 966,412 N.Y.S.2d 1025
Parties, 384 N.E.2d 692 Murray v. City of New York
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
401 N.Y.S.2d 773, 372 N.E.2d 560, 43 N.Y.2d 400

MOTION FOR REARGUMENT.

Dismissed as untimely.

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • Sullivan v. Board of Educ. of Eastchester Union Free School Dist.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 29, 1987
    ... ... Second Department ... June 29, 1987 ...         Montclare & Guay, New York City (Paul D. Montclare, of counsel), for appellant-respondent ...         Ford Marrin ... , the defendants have failed to allege that they will be prejudiced by the amendment (see, Murray v. City of New York, 43 N.Y.2d 400, 401 N.Y.S.2d 773, 372 N.E.2d 560, rearg. dismissed, 45 N.Y.2d ... ...
  • General Elec. Co. v. A.C. Towne Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 15, 1988
    ... ... -painting stage of the production process at G.E.'s manufacturing facility in Liverpool, New York. Towne installed the system using component parts manufactured and supplied by the defendant ... den. 55 N.Y.2d 801, 447 N.Y.S.2d 436, 432 N.E.2d 138; Murray v. City of New York, 43 N.Y.2d 400, 404-405, 401 N.Y.S.2d 773, 372 N.E.2d 560, rearg. dsmd. 45 ... ...
  • Balport Const. Co., Inc. v. New York Telephone Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 9, 1987
    ... ... Second Department ... Nov. 9, 1987 ...         Altieri, Kushner, Miuccio & Frind, P.C., New York City (Alexander A. Miuccio, of counsel), for appellant ...         John M. Clarke, New York City (Saul Scheier and Martin J. Murtagh, of ... p 3025.15), has been realized by this plaintiff. Accordingly, reversal is warranted (see, Murray v. City of New York, 43 N.Y.2d 400, 401 N.Y.S.2d 773, 372 N.E.2d 560, rearg. dismissed 45 N.Y.2d 966, 412 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 384 N.E.2d 692; Lane v ... ...
  • Burns v. Haines Equipment Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 8, 2001
    ... ... there is no prejudice to the defendant" (Stephan v Shulman, 130 A.D.2d 484, 485, citing Murray v City of New York, 43 N.Y.2d 400, rearg dismissed 45 N.Y.2d 966). Here, however, plaintiff failed ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT