Murray v. State of Louisiana, No. 718

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtSHIRAS
Citation41 L.Ed. 87,16 S.Ct. 990,163 U.S. 101
PartiesMURRAY v. STATE OF LOUISIANA
Docket NumberNo. 718
Decision Date18 May 1896

163 U.S. 101
16 S.Ct. 990
41 L.Ed. 87
MURRAY

v.

STATE OF LOUISIANA.

No. 718.
May 18, 1896.

Page 102

In October, 1894, in the criminal district court for the parish of Orleans, state of Louisiana an indictment for murder was found against one Jim Murray, alias Greasy Jim. On December 13, 1894, the accused was arraigned, pleaded not guilty, and was remanded for further proceedings.

On January 10, 1895, Thomas F. Maher, as attorney for the accused, challenged the grand jury, on the ground that it was not a legally constituted body, because the jury commissioner had discriminated against the prisoner on account of his race and color, by having excluded, from the venire from which the grand jury was selected, all colored men or negroes, which action was charged to be in conflict with the constitution and laws of Louisiana, and with the constitution of the United States.

To procure evidence to sustain his said challenge, the accused, by his counsel, asked for a subpoena duces tecum, directed to Francis C. Zachaire, registrar of the voters of the parish of Orleans, calling on him to furnish the total number of voters registered in the parish; the total number of white voters registered; the total number of colored voters; the total number of white and of colored voters who could sign their names at the closing of the registration office of the parish previous to the last congressional election held on November 6, 1894; also, for a subpoena duces tecum, addressed to the jury commissioners of the parish, commanding them to furnish the court, on the trial of the challenge to the grand jury, the names and residences of 3,500 citizens who appeared before them in the month of September, 1894, for qualification as jurors, and the names and residences of the 1,000 citizens whom they qualified and placed in the jury wheel, from which the grand jury which found the indictment in the present case was drawn. These motions for subpoenas were indorsed by the minute clerk as follows: 'Filed subject to orders.'

Page 103

On February 2, 1895, the challenge to the grand jury came on to be heard.

Apparently to save time, the state's attorney offered in evidence, and as part of the present record, the evidence taken before another section of the court, in the case of State of Louisiana v. George Heard, on a challenge to the grand jury, in which similar grounds of challenge had been made. The counsel for the accused, who had also acted as counsel for George Heard, made no objection to the filing of this evidence, but himself filed, as part of the present record, the assignments of error and the bills of exceptions filed by him in the other case.

Among other things, there appeared in this evidence in the case of Heard, and was read to the court in the present case, the return of the registry clerk showing a statement of registered voters of the parish of Orleans after the general election of November, 1892, viz.: Total number of voters, 59,262, of whom there were native white who sign, 35,382; native born who make their mark, 4,571; foreign white who sign, 8,283, and who make their mark, 1,672; colored who sign, 5,431, and who make their mark, 4,223. This admitted record contained the testimony of several deputy sheriffs, who served jury summons, and which went to show that few persons of color were so summoned; also, the testimony of the three jury commissioners, who testified that colored persons were summoned to appear before the commissioners to qualify as jurors, and that there were names of colored persons in the jury wheel from which this grand jury was drawn. They testified that, in taking names from the registration list, the commissioners selected them with reference to their qualifications as jurors, without regard to color; that a great many colored men were summoned, and there was no discrimination against colored men.

The court held that the plaintiff's challenge was not sustained by the evidence; that, while it was undeniable that the exclusion from the general service of all people of the African race on account of their color would be an unla ful abridgment of the rights of such citizens, yet that the evidence did

Page 104

not disclose such a case, but showed that the general service was not exclusively made up of the names of white persons, and that it was clearly established that colored people were not excluded on account of their race or color. The challenge was overruled, to which action of the court the accused, by his counsel, took several exceptions, which were duly allowed and signed.

The defendant then, by his attorney, made a motion to quash the indictment, upon the allegation that Act No. 170 of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
28 practice notes
  • Miller v. State
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • January 30, 1953
    ...30 S.Ct. 640, 54 L.Ed. 980; Williams v. State of Mississippi, 170 U.S. 213, 18 S.Ct. 583, 42 L.Ed. 1012; Murray v. State of Louisiana, 163 U.S. 101, 16 S.Ct. 990, 41 L.Ed. 87; Gibson v. State of Mississippi, supra; Jugiro v. Brush, supra; Wood v. Brush, 140 U.S. 278, 11 S.Ct. 738, 35 L.Ed. ......
  • City of Greenwood, Mississippi v. Peacock Peacock v. City of Greenwood, Mississippi, Nos. 471
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • June 20, 1966
    ...565, 16 S.Ct. 904, 40 L.Ed. 1075; Smith v. State of Mississippi, 162 U.S. 592, 16 S.Ct. 900, 40 L.Ed. 1082; Murray v. State of Louisiana, 163 U.S. 101, 16 S.Ct. 990, 41 L.Ed. 87; Williams v. State of Mississippi, 170 U.S. 213, 18 S.Ct. 583, 42 L.Ed. 1012; Dubuclet v. State of Louisiana, 103......
  • Fay v. People of State of New York Bove v. Same, Nos. 377 and 452
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • June 23, 1947
    ...is not rendered constitutionally invalid by failure of the statute to set forth any standards for selection. Murray v. State of Louisiana, 163 U.S. 101, 108, 16 S.Ct. 990, 992, 41 L.Ed. 87; Franklin v. State of South Carolina, 218 U.S. 161, 167, 168, 30 S.Ct. 640, 642, 54 L.Ed. 980; Akins v......
  • Herndon v. State, No. 9871.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • May 24, 1934
    ...212 U. S. 278, 29 S. Ct. 393, 53 L. Ed. 512, it was said that the question of unlawful exclusion is one of fact. In Murray v. Louisiana, 163 U. S. 101, 16 S. Ct. 990, 41 L. Ed. 87, the evidence was similar to that produced in the present case, and it was said by the highest court that a car......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
27 cases
  • Miller v. State
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • January 30, 1953
    ...30 S.Ct. 640, 54 L.Ed. 980; Williams v. State of Mississippi, 170 U.S. 213, 18 S.Ct. 583, 42 L.Ed. 1012; Murray v. State of Louisiana, 163 U.S. 101, 16 S.Ct. 990, 41 L.Ed. 87; Gibson v. State of Mississippi, supra; Jugiro v. Brush, supra; Wood v. Brush, 140 U.S. 278, 11 S.Ct. 738, 35 L.Ed. ......
  • City of Greenwood, Mississippi v. Peacock Peacock v. City of Greenwood, Mississippi, Nos. 471
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • June 20, 1966
    ...565, 16 S.Ct. 904, 40 L.Ed. 1075; Smith v. State of Mississippi, 162 U.S. 592, 16 S.Ct. 900, 40 L.Ed. 1082; Murray v. State of Louisiana, 163 U.S. 101, 16 S.Ct. 990, 41 L.Ed. 87; Williams v. State of Mississippi, 170 U.S. 213, 18 S.Ct. 583, 42 L.Ed. 1012; Dubuclet v. State of Louisiana, 103......
  • Fay v. People of State of New York Bove v. Same, Nos. 377 and 452
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • June 23, 1947
    ...is not rendered constitutionally invalid by failure of the statute to set forth any standards for selection. Murray v. State of Louisiana, 163 U.S. 101, 108, 16 S.Ct. 990, 992, 41 L.Ed. 87; Franklin v. State of South Carolina, 218 U.S. 161, 167, 168, 30 S.Ct. 640, 642, 54 L.Ed. 980; Akins v......
  • Herndon v. State, No. 9871.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • May 24, 1934
    ...212 U. S. 278, 29 S. Ct. 393, 53 L. Ed. 512, it was said that the question of unlawful exclusion is one of fact. In Murray v. Louisiana, 163 U. S. 101, 16 S. Ct. 990, 41 L. Ed. 87, the evidence was similar to that produced in the present case, and it was said by the highest court that a car......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The United States Supreme Court and the Segregation Issue
    • United States
    • ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, The Nbr. 304-1, March 1956
    • March 1, 1956
    ...U. S. 485 (1878).5 163 U. S. 537 (1896).6 See, for example, Charley Smith v. Missis-sippi, 162 U. S. 592 (1896) and Murray v.Louisiana, 163 U. S. 101 (1896).7 Williams v. Mississippi, 170 U. S. 213(1898).8 Giles v. Harris, 189 U. S. 475 (1903);Giles v. Teasley, 193 U. S. 146 (1904).9 Berea ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT