Murray v. Supreme Hive L. M. of W.
| Court | Tennessee Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Wilkes |
| Citation | Murray v. Supreme Hive L. M. of W., 80 S.W. 827 (Tenn. 1904) |
| Decision Date | 10 May 1904 |
| Parties | MURRAY v. SUPREME HIVE LADIES OF MACCABEES OF THE WORLD. |
Appeal from Chancery Court, Shelby County; F. H. Heiskell, Chancellor.
Suit by Mary Murray against the Supreme Hive of the Ladies of the Maccabees of the
World. From an adverse decree, complainant appeals. Affirmed.
Randolph & Randolph, for appellant. F. Zimmermann, for appellee.
This is an application on the part of complainant to be restored and reinstated in her position and in all her rights as a member of the defendant order, in which she holds an endowment certificate, which is made a part of her bill, and she asks that she be restored to all the rights to which she is entitled under said certificate. Defendant company defends upon the ground that, although she was once a member in good standing in said order, she has been expelled therefrom. The defendant claims that this action was taken in strict conformity with the bylaws, rules, and regulations in force at the time complainant became a member thereof, and the ground for said expulsion is that complainant obtained her membership by false representations as to her age.
The complainant made application for membership on the 21st day of April, 1893, and in her application stated as follows: "My name in full is Mary Murray; I was born in the county of Longford, state of Ireland, on the 27th day of August, 1841, and am now 51 years old."
The application contains this clause: "I hereby declare that the above are fair and true answers to the foregoing questions: and I hereby agree that these statements, with this application, and the laws now in force, or that may hereafter be adopted * * * shall form the basis of the contract for endowment; that any untrue or fraudulent answers and suppressions of fact in regard to my health, age * * * personal or family history, shall vitiate my beneficiary certificate, and forfeit all payments made thereon."
Under the laws of the order as then existing, it is provided as follows: "All white females of good moral character, who have reached their sixteenth birthday and have not passed their fifty-sixth birthday, shall be entitled to admission as endowment members."
Her certificate recites that she has been regularly initiated a member of Chelsea Hive, No. 3, located at Memphis, Tenn., and in case all the agreements and warranties made by her in her application are found to be true, and she continues to comply with the laws, rules, and regulations of the Supreme Hive L. O. T. M. of the World, which are now or may hereafter be in force, her beneficiaries, naming them, will be entitled to receive one assessment on the membership, not to exceed $2,000, upon satisfactory proof of the death of said member.
She continued to be a member until May, 1901. In 1900 the order became alarmed at the large death rate in the territory about Memphis, and required each member to fill out a new statement in writing regarding her age and other matters; the purpose being to determine whether a mistake had been made in the original statements, and, if so, to have them corrected.
Mrs. Murray in her own handwriting filled out one of these statements and signed the same, in which she stated that she was born August 27, 1842. In this document she gave the birth of her four children as being in 1867, 1868, 1870, and 1871.
In her deposition afterwards she stated that her first child was born in 1863, the second two or three years thereafter, the third less than two years after the second, and the fourth less than three years after the third.
Upon receiving this statement, the order, assuming that she did not know her age or had misstated it, ordered a personal investigation as to her case. This was authorized by the laws of the association, which provide that, if in case of an endowment member it shall at any time appear that false answers have been made to any of the questions propounded in the application, the person so answering may be proceeded against, and, upon conviction, may be expelled from all the rights, privileges, and benefits of the order.
A member of the Memphis bar in April, 1901, by order of the association, attempted to get an interview with Mrs. Murray in regard to this matter, but did not succeed. He, however, met her daughter, Mrs. Ryan, who was the beneficiary in the certificate, and stated his business to her. In May he made another attempt to interview Mrs. Murray, and again met Mrs. Ryan, who stated that she and her husband, Mr. Ryan, and her mother, Mrs. Murray, had consulted about the matter, and decided that Mrs. Murray would make no statement to the order, and would not be interviewed by any agent of the order. This action was reported to the supreme hive, together with information that Mrs. Murray had probably misstated her age, and was beyond the age limit at the date of her application. Thereupon the board of trustees of the order sent a registered letter to Mrs. Mary Murray, Memphis, Tenn., on May 27, 1901.
This letter was as follows:
Inclosed with this letter was the following document:
The laws of the order further provide: "That all notices or papers * * * to be given to the members or hives shall be served by delivering such notice or paper to the person or hive intended personally, or by depositing the same in the post office, properly directed to such member or hive at her or its place of residence."
Section 61, to which reference is made above, is as follows:
See Laws 1899, § 61.
These laws were in existence at the time Mrs. Murray made her application for membership.
On the 5th of July, Mrs. Murray having made no appearance or defense, the following letter was sent to her:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Armstrong v. Modern Woodmen of America
...160 P. 946 93 Wash. 352 ARMSTRONG et al. v. MODERN WOODMEN OF AMERICA. No. 13480.Supreme Court of WashingtonNovember 16, 1916 ... Department ... 2. Appeal from ... 660, 25 ... L.Ed. 306; Bardsley v. Sternberg, 18 Wash. 612, 52 ... P. 251, 524; Murray v. Supreme Hive Ladies of Maccabees ... of the World, 112 Tenn. 664, 80 S.W. 827; Priddy v ... ...
-
Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. Lee
...v. Wilson, 15 Utah 53, 58 P. 41; State v. Yapp, 2 S.E. (N. C.) 458; 40 L.R.A. (N.S.) 148; Lane v. Insurance Co., 54 S.E. 854; Murray v. Supreme Hive, 80 S.W. 827; Houten v. Pine, 38 N.J.Eq. 72; Leonard v. Prudential Ins. Co., 107 N.W. 646; Lovick v. Providence Life Assn., 14 S.E. 506. In th......
- Murray v. Supreme Hive Ladies of Maccabees of the World
-
Barthell v. Zachman
...36 S.W.2d 886 162 Tenn. 336 BARTHELL et al. v. ZACHMAN et al. Supreme Court of Tennessee.April 4, 1931 ... Appeal ... from Chancery Court, Davidson ... excess of jurisdiction, assure him relief. Murray v ... Supreme Hive, 112 Tenn. 679, 80 S.W. 827; 7 C.J. 1116; ... 19 R. C. L. 1244 et seq ... ...