Murray v. Woodburn
Decision Date | 06 January 1993 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 93-0005. |
Parties | John Joseph MURRAY v. Paul WOODBURN. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
In Mr. Murray's 87th suit before me claiming violations of his civil rights he complains:
The incident apparently took place at Bucks County Prison. Mr. Murray is now at Norristown State Hospital. Mr. Murray alleges he told Dr. Veneroff about the alleged incident with the result that "he laughed at me." Mr. Murray requests that I order "appropriate action." He qualifies for in forma pauperis status.
A complaint is frivolous when it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989). A factual frivolousness finding is appropriate only if the facts alleged rise to the level of the irrational or the wholly incredible. Denton v. Hernandez, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 118 L.Ed.2d 340 (1992) ( ).
Mean harassment of the sort alleged by Mr. Murray is insufficient to state a constitutional deprivation. Collins v. Cundy, 603 F.2d 825 (10th Cir.1979) ( ); McFadden v. Lucas, 713 F.2d 143, 146 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 464 U.S. 998, 104 S.Ct. 499, 78 L.Ed.2d 691 (1983) ( ); Oltarzewski v. Ruggiero, 830 F.2d 136 (9th Cir.1987) (vulgarity); Cf. Northington v. Jackson, 973 F.2d 1518 (10th Cir.1992) ( ); Burton v. Livingston, 791 F.2d 97 (8th Cir.1986) ( ); Douglas v. Marino, 684 F.Supp. 395 (D.N.J.1988) ( ).
I would not presume to say Mr. Murray's claim is irrational or wholly incredible. The more difficult question is whether, given his vulnerabilities, provoking him to punch a prison official in the nose and then using the incident as a basis for committing him states a claim against a prison official. Under the present state of the law, it does not.
I have no complaint about Mr. Murray's 87 cases since 1989. Some have gone to trial. One resulted in the installation of a law library at Norristown State Hospital....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bieros v. Nicola
...some constitutionally protected right. Prisoners' Legal Ass'n v. Roberson, 822 F.Supp. 185, 189 (D.N.J.1993); Murray v. Woodburn, 809 F.Supp. 383, 384 (E.D.Pa. 1993); Hodgin v. Agents of Montgomery County, 619 F.Supp. 1550, 1553 (E.D.Pa. 1985); Ricketts v. Derello, 574 F.Supp. 645, 647 (E.D......
-
Maclean v. Secor, Civ.A. No. 93-2383.
...the sort detailed above will not, without some reinforcing act accompanying them, state a constitutional claim. See Murray v. Woodburn, 809 F.Supp. 383, 384 (E.D.Pa.1993) ("Mean harassment ... is insufficient to state a constitutional deprivation."); Prisoners' Legal Ass'n v. Roberson, 822 ......
-
Stilton v. Adm'r Albino
...does not violate inmate's constitutional rights); Prisoners' Legal Ass'n v. Roberson, 822 F. Supp. 185 (D.N.J. 1993); Murray v. Woodburn, 809 F. Supp. 383 (E.D.Pa. 1993); Douglas v. Marino, 684 F. Supp. 395 (D.N.J. 1988). Racially discriminatory statements, racial slurs and epithets, withou......
-
Ornelas v. Giurbino
...v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1092 (9th Cir.1996)("[V]erbal harassment generally does not violate the Eighth Amendment."); Murray v. Woodburn, 809 F.Supp. 383 (E.D.Pa.1993) ("Mean [verbal] harassment of the sort alleged by [plaintiff] is insufficient to state a constitutional deprivation."). As su......