Music Publishing Company v. Apollo Company

• Decision Date: 24 February 1908
• Docket Number: Nos. 110,111,WHITE-SMITH,s. 110
• Citation: Music Publishing Company v. Apollo Company, 209 U.S. 1, 28 S.Ct. 319, 52 L.Ed. 655, 14 Ann. Cas. 628 (1908)
• Parties: MUSIC PUBLISHING COMPANY, Appt., v. APOLLO COMPANY
• Court: U.S. Supreme Court

209 U.S. 1

28 S.Ct. 319

52 L.Ed. 655

WHITE-SMITH MUSIC PUBLISHING COMPANY, Appt.,

v APOLLO COMPANY.

Nos. 110, 111.

Argued January 16 and 17, 1908.

Decided February 24, 1908.

Mr. Livingston Gifford for appellant.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 1-5 intentionally omitted]Messrs. Charles S. Burton, John J. O'Connell, Munday, Evarts, & Adcock, and Wilcox & Brodek for appellee.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 5-8 intentionally omitted]Mr. Albert Walker for the Connorized Music Company.

Mr. George W. Pound for the De Kleist Musical Instrument Mfg. Company and the Rudolph-Wurlitzer Company.

Mr. Nathan Burkan for Victor Herbert.

Mr. Justice Daydelivered the opinion of the court:

These cases may be considered together.They are appeals from the judgment of the circuit court of appeals of the second circuit (77 C. C. A. 368, 147 Fed. 226), affirming the decree of the circuit court of the United States for the southern district of New York, rendered August 4, 1905(139 Fed. 427), dismissing the bills of the complainant(now appellant) for want of equity.Motions have been made to dismiss the appeals, and a petition for writ of certiorari has been filed by appellant.In view of the nature of the cases the writ of certiorari is granted, the record on the appeals to stand as a return to the writs.Montana Min. Co. v. St. Louis Min. & Mill. Co.204 U. S. 204, 51 L. ed. 444, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 254.

The actions were brought to restrain infringement of the copyrights of two certain musical compositions, published in the form of sheet music, entitled respectively, 'Little Cotton Dolly' and 'Kentucky Babe.'The appellee, defendant below, is engaged in the sale of piano players and player pianos known as the 'Apollo,' and of perforated rolls of music used in connection therewith.The appellant, as assignee of Adam Geibel, the composer, alleged compliance with the copyright act, and that a copyright was duly obtained by it on or about March 17, 1897.The answer was general in its nature, and upon the testimony adduced a decree was rendered, as stated, in favor of the Apollo Company, defendant below, appellee here.

The action was brought under the provisions of the copyright act, § 4952(U. S. Comp. Stat.Supp. 1907, p. 1021), giving to the author, inventor, designer, or proprietor of any book, map, chart, dramatic or musical composition the sole liberty of printing, reprinting, publishing, completing, copying, executing, finishing and vending the same.The circuit courts of the United States are given jurisdiction under § 4970(U. S. Comp. Stat. 1901, p. 3416) to grant injunctions according to the course and principles of courts of equity in copyright cases.The appellee is the manufacturer of certain musical instruments adapted to be used with perforated rolls.The testimony discloses that certain of these rolls, used in connection with such instruments, and being connected with the mechanism to which they apply, reproduce in sound the melody recorded in the two pieces of music copyrighted by the appellant.

The manufacture of such instruments and the use of such musical rolls has developed rapidly in recent years in this country and abroad.The record discloses that in the year 1902 from seventy to seventyfive thousand of such instruments were in use in the United States and that from one million to one million and a half of such perforated musical rolls, to be more fully described hereafter, were made in this country in that year.

It is evident that the question involved in the use of such rolls is one of very considerable importance, involving large property interests and closely touching the rights of composers and music publishers.The case was argued with force and ability, orally and upon elaborate briefs.

Without entering into a detailed discussion of the mechanical construction of such instruments and rolls, it is enough to say that they are what has become familiar to the public in the form of mechanical attachments to pianos, such as the pianola, and the musical rolls consist of perforated sheets, which are passed over ducts connected with the operating parts of the mechanism in such manner that the same are kept sealed until, by means of perforations in the rolls, air pressure is admitted to the ducts which operate the pneumatic devices to sound the notes.This is done with the aid of an operator, upon whose skill and experience the success of the rendition largely depends.As the roll is drawn over the tracker board the notes are sounded as the perforations admit the atmospheric pressure, the perforations having been so arranged that the effect is to produce the melody or tune for which the roll has been cut.

Speaking in a general way, it may be said that these rolls are made in three ways.First.With the score or staff notation before him the arranger, with the aid of a rule or guide and a graduated schedule, marks the position and size of the perforations on a sheet of paper to correspond to the order of notes in the composition.The marked sheet is then passed into the hands of an operator who cuts the apertures, by hand, in the paper.This perforated sheet is inspected and corrected, and when corrected is called 'the original.'This original is used as a stencil and by passing ink rollers over it a pattern is prepared.The stenciled perforations are then cut, producing the master or templet.The master is placed in the perforating machine and reproductions thereof obtained, which are the perforated rolls in question.Expression marks are separately copied on the perforated music sheets by means of rubber stamps.Second.A perforated music roll made by another manufacturer may be used from which to make a new record.Third.By playing upon a piano to which is attached an automatic recording device producing a perforated matrix from which a perforated music roll may be produced.

It is evident, therefore, that persons skilled in the art can take such pieces of sheet music in staff notation, and, by means of the proper instruments, make drawings indicating the perforations, which are afterwards outlined and cut upon the rolls in such wise as to reproduce, with the aid of the other mechanism, the music which is recorded in the copyrighted sheets.

The learned counsel for the parties to this action advance opposing theories as to the nature and extent of the copyright given by statutory laws enacted by Congress for the protection of copyright, and a determination of which is the true one will go far to decide the rights of the parties in this case.On behalf of the appellant it is insisted that it is the intention of the copyright act to protect the intellectual conception which has resulted in the compilation of notes which, when properly played, produce the melody which is the real invention of the composer.It is insisted that this is the thing which Congress intended to protect, and that the protection covers all means of expression of the order of notes which produce the air or melody which the composer has invented.

Music, it is argued, is intended for the ear as writing is for the eye, and that it is the intention of the copyright act to prevent the multiplication of every means of reproducing the music of the composer to the ear.

On the other hand, it is contended that while it is true that copyright statutes are intended to reward mental creations or conceptions, that the extent of this protection is a matter of statutory law, and that it has been extended only to the tangible results of mental conception, and that only the tangible thing is dealt with by the law, and its multiplication or reproduction is all that is protected by the statute.

Before considering the construction of the statute as an independent question the appellee invokes the doctrine of stare decisis in its favor and it is its contention that in all the cases in which this question has been up for judicial consideration it has been held that such mechanical producers of musical tones as are involved in this case have not been considered to be within the protection of the copyright act; and that, if within the power of Congress to extend protection to such subjects the uniform holdings have been that it is not intended to include them in the statutory protection given.While it may be that the decisions have not been of that binding character that would enable the appellee to claim the protection of the doctrine of stare decisis to the extent of precluding further consideration of the question, it must be admitted that the decisions so far as brought to our attention in the full discussion had at the bar and upon the briefs have been uniformly to the effect that these perforated rolls operated in connection with mechanical devices for the production of music are not within the copyright act.It was so held in Kennedy v. McTammany, 33 Fed. 584.The decision was written by Judge Colt in the first circuit; the case was subsequently brought to this court, where it was dismissed for failure to print the record.145 U. S. 643, 36 L. ed. 853, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 983.In that case the learned judge said:

'I cannot convince myself that these perforated strips of paper are copies of sheet music within the meaning of the copyright law.They are not made to be addressed to the eye as sheet music, but they form part of a machine.They are not designed to be used for such purposes as sheet music, nor do they in any sense occupy the same field as sheet music.They are a mechanical invention made for the sole purpose of performing tunes mechanically upon a musical instrument.'

Again the matter was given careful consideration in the court of appeals of the District of Columbia in an opinion by Justice Shepard (Stern v. Rosey, 17 App. D. C. 562), in which that learned justice, speaking for the court, said:

'We cannot regard the reproduction, through the agency of a phonograph, of the sounds of musical instruments playing the music...