Mutual Film Company v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
| Decision Date | 23 February 1915 |
| Docket Number | No. 457,457 |
| Parties | MUTUAL FILM COMPANY, Appt., v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO et al |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. William B. Sanders, Walter N. Seligsberg, and Harold T. Clark for appellant.
Messrs. Waldo G. Morse and Jacob Schechter as amici curioe.
Messrs. Robert M. Morgan, Clarence D. Laylin, James I. Boulger, and Mr. Timothy S. Hogan, Attorney General of Ohio, for appellees.
This case was submitted with No. 456 [236 U. S. 230, 59 L. ed. ——, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 387], just decided. In the latter case the complainant in the court below, and appellant here, was a corporation of Virginia. The appellant in the pending case is a corporation of Ohio, and counsel say, 'although there are some differences in the way in which their business is conducted, yet the question involved are the same the records in both cases are nearly identical, and the court below treated them together, rendering the one opinion to cover both.' And counsel have submitted them on the same argument.
On the authority, therefore, of the opinion in No. 456, the decree is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Eureka Productions v. Lehman
...and mingled as much as from their nature they can be with other property of the state." See, also, Mutual Film Co. v. Industrial Comm. of Ohio, 236 U.S. 247, 35 S.Ct. 393, 59 L.Ed. 561; Mutual Film Co. v. Hodges, 236 U.S. 248, 35 S.Ct. 393, 59 L.Ed. We cannot accept the argument that the ch......
-
Mutual Film Corp. v. City of Chicago
...... Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio. et al., 236 U.S. 230, 35 Sup.Ct. 387, 59 L.Ed. . . ......
-
Mutual Film Corporation of Missouri v. George Hodges
......His disapproval of any film or reel may be reviewed by a commission consisting of the governor, attorney general, and secretary of state, and ... for the same reasons as it was contended there that the statute of Ohio had. We need not, therefore, repeat the reasoning. It establishes that ......
-
The Fiction of the First Freedom
...Alexandria, 341 U.S. 622 (1951). 13 Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, 236 U.S. 230 (1915); Mutual Film Corp. v. Hodges, 236 U.S. 247 (1915); Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940); National BroadcastingCompany v. United States, 319 U.S. 190 (1943); Thomas v. Collins,......